Costs and Readmissions Associated with Type A Aortic Dissections at High- and Low-Volume Centers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59958/hsf.6821Keywords:
type A aortic dissection, costs, outcomes, volumeAbstract
Background: Costs and readmissions associated with type A aortic dissection repairs are not well understood. We investigated statewide readmissions, costs, and outcomes associated with the surgical management of type A aortic dissection repairs at low- and high-volume centers. Methods: We identified all adult type A aortic dissection patients who underwent operative repair in the Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission's database (2012–2020). Hospitals were stratified into high- (top quartile of total repairs) or low-volume centers. Results: Of the 249 patients included, 193 (77.5%) were treated at a high-volume center. Patients treated at high- and low-volume centers had no differences in age, sex, race, primary payer, or severity (all p > 0.5). High- compared to low-volume centers had a greater proportion of patients transferred in (71.5% vs. 17.9%, p < 0.001). High-volume centers also had longer lengths of stay (12 vs. 8 days, p < 0.001), similar inpatient mortality (13.0% vs. 16.1%, p = 0.6), and similar proportion of patients readmitted (54.9% vs. 51.8%, p = 0.7). High-volume centers had greater index admission costs ($114,859 vs. $72,090, p < 0.001) and similar readmission costs ($48,367 vs. $42,204, p = 0.5). At high-volume centers, transferred patients compared to direct admissions had greater severity of illness (p = 0.05), similar mortality (p = 0.53), and greater lengths of stay (p = 0.05). Conclusions: High-volume centers had a greater number of patients transferred from other institutions compared to low-volume centers. High-volume centers were associated with increased index admission resource utilization, with transfer patients having higher illness severity and greater resource utilization, yet similar mortality, compared to direct admission patients.
References
Evangelista A, Isselbacher EM, Bossone E, Gleason TG, Eusanio MD, Sechtem U, et al. Insights From the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection: A 20-Year Experience of Collaborative Clinical Research. Circulation. 2018; 137: 1846–1860.
Mody PS, Wang Y, Geirsson A, Kim N, Desai MM, Gupta A, et al. Trends in aortic dissection hospitalizations, interventions, and outcomes among medicare beneficiaries in the United States, 2000-2011. Circulation. Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes. 2014; 7: 920–928.
Pape LA, Awais M, Woznicki EM, Suzuki T, Trimarchi S, Evangelista A, et al. Presentation, Diagnosis, and Outcomes of Acute Aortic Dissection: 17-Year Trends From the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2015; 66: 350–358.
Lee TC, Kon Z, Cheema FH, Grau-Sepulveda MV, Englum B, Kim S, et al. Contemporary management and outcomes of acute type A aortic dissection: An analysis of the STS adult cardiac surgery database. Journal of Cardiac Surgery. 2018; 33: 7–18.
Bonser RS, Ranasinghe AM, Loubani M, Evans JD, Thalji NMA, Bachet JE, et al. Evidence, lack of evidence, controversy, and debate in the provision and performance of the surgery of acute type A aortic dissection. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2011; 58: 2455–2474.
Andersen ND, Ganapathi AM, Hanna JM, Williams JB, Gaca JG, Hughes GC. Outcomes of acute type a dissection repair before and after implementation of a multidisciplinary thoracic aortic surgery program. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2014; 63: 1796–1803.
Chikwe J, Cavallaro P, Itagaki S, Seigerman M, Diluozzo G, Adams DH. National outcomes in acute aortic dissection: influence of surgeon and institutional volume on operative mortality. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2013; 95: 1563–1569.
Dobaria V, Kwon OJ, Hadaya J, Sanaiha Y, Sareh S, Aguayo E, et al. Impact of center volume on outcomes of surgical repair for type A acute aortic dissections. Surgery. 2020; 168: 185–192.
Merlo AE, Chauhan D, Pettit C, Hong KN, Saunders CR, Chen C, et al. Outcomes following emergent open repair for thoracic aortic dissection are improved at higher volume centers in direct admissions and transfers. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery. 2016; 11: 118.
Umana-Pizano JB, Nissen AP, Sandhu HK, Miller CC, Loghin A, Safi HJ, et al. Acute Type A Dissection Repair by High-Volume Vs Low-Volume Surgeons at a High-Volume Aortic Center. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2019; 108: 1330–1336.
Yesantharao PS, Etchill EW, Zhou AL, Ong CS, Metkus TS, Canner JK, et al. The impact of a statewide payment reform on transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) utilization and readmissions. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions: Official Journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions. 2023; 101: 1193–1202.
Sachs T, Pomposelli F, Hagberg R, Hamdan A, Wyers M, Giles K, et al. Open and endovascular repair of type B aortic dissection in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2010; 52: 860–866.
Wang GJ, Jackson BM, Foley PJ, Damrauer SM, Goodney PP, Kelz RR, et al. National trends in admissions, repair, and mortality for thoracic aortic aneurysm and type B dissection in the National Inpatient Sample. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2018; 67: 1649–1658.
Zimmerman KP, Oderich G, Pochettino A, Hanson KT, Habermann EB, Bower TC, et al. Improving mortality trends for hospitalization of aortic dissection in the National Inpatient Sample. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2016; 64: 606–615.e1.
Averill RF, Goldfield N, Hughes JS, Bonazelli J, McCullough EC, Steinback BA, et al. ALL PATIENT REFINED DIAGNOSIS RELATED GROUPS (APR-DRGs) Version 20.0. 2003. Available at: https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/APR-DRGsV20MethodologyOverviewandBibliography.pdf (Accessed: 3 May 2022).
Baram D, Daroowalla F, Garcia R, Zhang G, Chen JJ, Healy E, et al. Use of the All Patient Refined-Diagnosis Related Group (APR-DRG) Risk of Mortality Score as a Severity Adjustor in the Medical ICU. Clinical Medicine. Circulatory, Respiratory and Pulmonary Medicine. 2008; 2: 19–25.
Kvasnovsky CL, Lumpkins K, Diaz JJ, Chun JY. Emergency pediatric surgery: Comparing the economic burden in specialized versus nonspecialized children's centers. Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 2018; 53: 996–1000.
Yesantharao LV, Etchill EW, Canner J, Alejo D, Choi CW, Lawton JS, et al. Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia After Cardiac Surgery—A Statewide Review of Health Care Utilization. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2022. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003497522011110 (Accessed: 20 October 2023).
Rajkumar R, Patel A, Murphy K, Colmers JM, Blum JD, Conway PH, et al. Maryland's all-payer approach to delivery-system reform. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2014; 370: 493–495.
Sømme S, Shahi N, McLeod L, Torok M, McManus B, Ziegler MM. Neonatal surgery in low- vs. high-volume institutions: a KID inpatient database outcomes and cost study after repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia, esophageal atresia, and gastroschisis. Pediatric Surgery International. 2019; 35: 1293–1300.
Lewit R, Jancelewicz T. Center Volume and Cost-Effectiveness in the Treatment of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia. The Journal of Surgical Research. 2022; 273: 71–78.
Regenbogen SE, Gust C, Birkmeyer JD. Hospital surgical volume and cost of inpatient surgery in the elderly. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2012; 215: 758–765.
Mussa FF, Horton JD, Moridzadeh R, Nicholson J, Trimarchi S, Eagle KA. Acute Aortic Dissection and Intramural Hematoma: A Systematic Review. JAMA. 2016; 316: 754–763.
