Correlation between Left Ventricular Pressure–Strain Loop and Severity in Patients with Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome and Its Application Value in Short-Term Prognosis Evaluation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59958/hsf.7283Keywords:
left ventricular pressure–strain loop, MW, NSTE-ACS, echocardiographyAbstract
Purpose To investigate the diagnostic value of nonintrusive left ventricular pressure–strain loop (LV-PSL) for assessing overall myocardial function in sufferers with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) with or without coronary stenosis. The results of this research might provide insights into the diagnosis and management of NSTE-ACS. Methods All 268 sufferers with NSTE-ACS who were received by the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University between June 2019 and June 2021 were enrolled. Sufferers with single or multiple extramural coronary diameter stenosis ≥70% on coronary angiography were defined as the stenosis group. All sufferers underwent noninvasive LV-PSL construction by using cuff blood pressure as the left ventricular pressure before coronary angiography, and the resulting images were imported and analysed with offline analysis software to obtain global longitudinal strain (GLS), global work index (GWI), global constructive work (GCW), global wasted work (GWW) and global work efficiency (GWE). The correlation between severity Gensini score and myocardial work (MW) parameters was identified through Spearman analysis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the optimal cut-off values for predicting coronary stenosis, and logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent factors affecting left ventricular myocardial function in sufferers of NSTE-ACS. The occurrence of adverse cardiac events during the follow-up period was recorded. Results Through the comparative analysis of general clinical data, significant differences were found between the stenosis and nonstenosis groups in terms of gender, hyperlipidaemia, hypertension and smoking. However, statistical difference was observed only for hypertension (stenosis group 54.2%; p < 0.05) and hypercholesterolaemia (stenosis group 53.5%; p < 0.05). GLS (tz value 3.063), GCW (tz value 11.494), GWI (tz value 9.627) and GWE (tz value 12.780) reduced and GWW (tz value 11.504) increased in the stenosis group compared with those in the nonstenosis group. All differences were statistically significant (all p < 0.05). Severity Gensini scores were negatively correlated with GLS, GCW, GWI and GWE but positively correlated with GWW (p < 0.001). The ROC curve and univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that GWE (odds ratio (OR) 2.881; 95% confidence internal (95% CI) 2.176–3.816; p < 0.001) had the largest area under the curve and greatest sensitivity for coronary stenosis diagnosis. GWE was (OR 2.875; 95% CI 2.217–3.727; p < 0.001) and (OR 2.881; 95% CI 2.176–3.816; p < 0.001). During an average follow-up period of 26.7 months, 19 sufferers experienced adverse cardiac events. GWE exhibited high predictive ability for identifying such events. Conclusions Noninvasive LV-PSL can identify whether sufferers of NSTE-ACS have acute coronary stenosis regardless of the location or size of the stenosis and can detect varying degrees of left ventricular dysfunction in such sufferers. Amongst indices, GWE had the highest diagnostic efficiency for diagnosing sufferers of NSTE-ACS with coronary stenosis and highest predictive ability for adverse cardiac events.
References
Collet JP, Thiele H, Barbato E, Barthélémy O, Bauersachs J, Bhatt DL, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. European Heart Journal. 2021; 42: 1289–1367.
Hung CS, Chen YH, Huang CC, Lin MS, Yeh CF, Li HY, et al. Prevalence and outcome of patients with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction with occluded "culprit" artery - a systemic review and meta-analysis. Critical Care (London, England). 2018; 22: 34.
Task Force for Diagnosis and Treatment of Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes of European Society of Cardiology, Bassand JP, Hamm CW, Ardissino D, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. European Heart Journal. 2007; 28: 1598–1660.
Kofoed KF, Kelbæk H, Hansen PR, Torp-Pedersen C, Høfsten D, Kløvgaard L, et al. Early Versus Standard Care Invasive Examination and Treatment of Patients with Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome. Circulation. 2018; 138: 2741–2750.
Rahman MH, Afrin SF, Islam MA, Shahriar MS, Zahid MA, Badiuzzaman M. Comparison of ST-segment resolution influencing in hospital outcome after primary percutaneous coronary intervention and fibrinolysis (with streptokinase) in patients with acute ST- segment elevation myocardial infarction. Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science. 2016; 15: 252–255.
Fabris E, van 't Hof A, Hamm CW, Lapostolle F, Lassen JF, Goodman SG, et al. Clinical impact and predictors of complete ST segment resolution after primary percutaneous coronary intervention: A subanalysis of the ATLANTIC Trial. European Heart Journal. Acute Cardiovascular Care. 2019; 8: 208–217.
Singh A, Voss WB, Lentz RW, Thomas JD, Akhter N. The Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Echocardiographic Strain. JAMA Cardiology. 2019; 4: 580–588.
Biswas M, Sudhakar S, Nanda NC, Buckberg G, Pradhan M, Roomi AU, et al. Two- and three-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography: clinical applications and future directions. Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.). 2013; 30: 88–105.
Voigt JU, Cvijic M. 2- and 3-Dimensional Myocardial Strain in Cardiac Health and Disease. JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging. 2019; 12: 1849–1863.
Mor-Avi V, Patel MB, Maffessanti F, Singh A, Medvedofsky D, Zaidi SJ, et al. Fusion of Three-Dimensional Echocardiographic Regional Myocardial Strain with Cardiac Computed Tomography for Noninvasive Evaluation of the Hemodynamic Impact of Coronary Stenosis in Patients with Chest Pain. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography: Official Publication of the American Society of Echocardiography. 2018; 31: 664–673.
Abawi D, Rinaldi T, Faragli A, Pieske B, Morris DA, Kelle S, et al. The non-invasive assessment of myocardial work by pressure-strain analysis: clinical applications. Heart Failure Reviews. 2022; 27: 1261–1279.
van der Bijl P, Kostyukevich M, El Mahdiui M, Hansen G, Samset E, Ajmone Marsan N, et al. A Roadmap to Assess Myocardial Work: From Theory to Clinical Practice. JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging. 2019; 12: 2549–2554.
Russell K, Eriksen M, Aaberge L, Wilhelmsen N, Skulstad H, Gjesdal O, et al. Assessment of wasted myocardial work: a novel method to quantify energy loss due to uncoordinated left ventricular contractions. American Journal of Physiology. Heart and Circulatory Physiology. 2013; 305: H996–H1003.
Hubert A, Le Rolle V, Leclercq C, Galli E, Samset E, Casset C, et al. Estimation of myocardial work from pressure-strain loops analysis: an experimental evaluation. European Heart Journal. Cardiovascular Imaging. 2018; 19: 1372–1379.
Russell K, Eriksen M, Aaberge L, Wilhelmsen N, Skulstad H, Remme EW, et al. A novel clinical method for quantification of regional left ventricular pressure-strain loop area: a non-invasive index of myocardial work. European Heart Journal. 2012; 33: 724–733.
Mitchell C, Rahko PS, Blauwet LA, Canaday B, Finstuen JA, Foster MC, et al. Guidelines for Performing a Comprehensive Transthoracic Echocardiographic Examination in Adults: Recommendations from the American Society of Echocardiography. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography: Official Publication of the American Society of Echocardiography. 2019; 32: 1–64.
Manganaro R, Marchetta S, Dulgheru R, Ilardi F, Sugimoto T, Robinet S, et al. Echocardiographic reference ranges for normal non-invasive myocardial work indices: results from the EACVI NORRE study. European Heart Journal. Cardiovascular Imaging. 2019; 20: 582–590.
Qin Y, Wu X, Wang J, Li Y, Ding X, Guo D, et al. Value of territorial work efficiency estimation in non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome: a study with non-invasive left ventricular pressure-strain loops. The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging. 2021; 37: 1255–1265.
Peters SAE, Muntner P, Woodward M. Sex Differences in the Prevalence of, and Trends in, Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Treatment, and Control in the United States, 2001 to 2016. Circulation. 2019; 139: 1025–1035.
Albrektsen G, Heuch I, Løchen ML, Thelle DS, Wilsgaard T, Njølstad I, et al. Lifelong Gender Gap in Risk of Incident Myocardial Infarction: The Tromsø Study. JAMA Internal Medicine. 2016; 176: 1673–1679.
Leitman M, Lysiansky M, Lysyansky P, Friedman Z, Tyomkin V, Fuchs T, et al. Circumferential and longitudinal strain in 3 myocardial layers in normal subjects and in patients with regional left ventricular dysfunction. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography: Official Publication of the American Society of Echocardiography. 2010; 23: 64–70.
Salminen PR, Dahle GO, Moen CA, Jonassen AK, Haaverstad R, Matre K, et al. Intracoronary insulin administered at reperfusion in a porcine model of acute coronary syndrome. European Heart Journal. Acute Cardiovascular Care. 2015; 4: 230–240.
Brainin P, Skaarup KG, Iversen AZ, Jørgensen PG, Platz E, Jensen JS, et al. Post-systolic shortening predicts heart failure following acute coronary syndrome. International Journal of Cardiology. 2019; 276: 191–197.
Edwards NFA, Scalia GM, Shiino K, Sabapathy S, Anderson B, Chamberlain R, et al. Global Myocardial Work Is Superior to Global Longitudinal Strain to Predict Significant Coronary Artery Disease in Patients with Normal Left Ventricular Function and Wall Motion. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography: Official Publication of the American Society of Echocardiography. 2019; 32: 947–957.
Boe E, Russell K, Eek C, Eriksen M, Remme EW, Smiseth OA, et al. Non-invasive myocardial work index identifies acute coronary occlusion in patients with non-ST-segment elevation-acute coronary syndrome. European Heart Journal. Cardiovascular Imaging. 2015; 16: 1247–1255.
Minhas AS, Gilotra NA, Goerlich E, Metkus T, Garibaldi BT, Sharma G, et al. Myocardial Work Efficiency, A Novel Measure of Myocardial Dysfunction, Is Reduced in COVID-19 Patients and Associated with In-Hospital Mortality. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine. 2021; 8: 667721.
D'Andrea A, Ilardi F, D'Ascenzi F, Bandera F, Benfari G, Esposito R, et al. Impaired myocardial work efficiency in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. European Heart Journal. Cardiovascular Imaging. 2021; 22: 1312–1320.
Lustosa RP, Butcher SC, van der Bijl P, El Mahdiui M, Montero-Cabezas JM, Kostyukevich MV, et al. Global Left Ventricular Myocardial Work Efficiency and Long-Term Prognosis in Patients After ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Circulation. Cardiovascular Imaging. 2021; 14: e012072.
van der Bijl P, Vo NM, Kostyukevich MV, Mertens B, Ajmone Marsan N, Delgado V, et al. Prognostic implications of global, left ventricular myocardial work efficiency before cardiac resynchronization therapy. European Heart Journal. Cardiovascular Imaging. 2019; 20: 1388–1394.
Lin J, Wu W, Gao L, He J, Zhu Z, Pang K, et al. Global Myocardial Work Combined with Treadmill Exercise Stress to Detect Significant Coronary Artery Disease. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography: Official Publication of the American Society of Echocardiography. 2022; 35: 247–257.