Midterm Results of Beating Heart Surgery in 1-Vessel Disease: Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass versus Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass with Full Sternotomy

Authors

  • Calin Vicol
  • Georg Nollert
  • Helmut Mair
  • Vicky Samuel
  • Che Lim
  • Michael Tiftikidis
  • Sandra Eifert
  • Bruno Reichart

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1532/hsf.958

Abstract

Background: Off-pump cardiac surgery is becoming an established method of surgical revascularization. However, performing anastomoses on a beating heart can be challenging, especially through small incisions. We compared our midterm results in patients with 1 vessel disease using full sternotomy (OPCAB) or a left anterior minithoracotomy (MIDCAB).

Methods: At our institution between December 1996 and December 1998, 102 patients (OPCAB, n = 45, MIDCAB, n = 57); age, 61 ± 11 years; 69% men with 1-vessel disease of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) underwent off-pump myocardial revascularization through the left internal thoracic artery (LITA). In the OPCAB group 17 (37.8%) of the patients received an additional vein graft to a diagonal branch. OPCAB was generally preferred in obese or high-risk patients or patients with a long LITA-LAD distance ( > 7 cm) on an electron beam computed tomography of the chest.

Results: Operative mortality was 0. Time of surgery (169 ± 48 versus 197 ± 45 minutes) and coronary artery occlusion time (19 ± 7 versus 23 ± 6 minutes) were significantly lower (P = .004 and P = .009) in the OPCAB group. MIDCAB surgery was related to a higher incidence of occluded (4 versus 0; P = .039) or stenosed (7 versus 2; P = .06) anastomoses and necessity for immediate reintervention (9 versus 0; P = .023). During a mean follow-up period of 5.2 years, MIDCAB patients (6 MIDCAB patients versus 1 OPCAB patient) tended to need more coronary interventions and develop more recurrent angina (23 MIDCAB versus 12 OPCAB patients). Two OPCAB patients died during the follow-up period.

Conclusions: Our initial experience in beating heart surgery demonstrated that MIDCAB is technically more challenging than OPCAB. MIDCAB procedures should

References

Ancalmo N, Busby JR. 1997. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass surgery: really minimal? Ann Thorac Surg 64:928-9.nArom KV, Emery RW, Flavin TF, Petersen JP. 1999. Cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive coronary artery bypass surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 68:1562-6.nBonchek LI. 2002. Off-pump coronary bypass: is it for everyone? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 124:431-4.nCameron A, Davis KB, Green G, Schaff HV. 1996. Coronary bypass surgery with internal thoracic artery grafts: effects on survival over a 15-year period. N Engl J Med 334:216-9.nCisowski M, Drzewiecki J, Drzewiecka-Gerber A, et al. 2002. Primary stenting versus MIDCAB: preliminary report--comparison of two methods of revascularization in single left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis. Ann Thorac Surg 74:S1334-9.nCooley DA. 2000. Beating-heart surgery for coronary revascularization: is it the most important development since the introduction of the heart-lung machine? Ann Thorac Surg 70:1779-81.nDetter C, Reichenspurner H, Boehm DH, Thalhammer M, Schütz A, Reichart B. 2001. Single vessel revascularization with beating heart techniques: minithoracotomy or sternotomy? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 19:464-70.nDrenth DJ, Winter JB, Veeger NJGM, et al. 2002. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty with stenting in isolated high-grade stenosis of the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery: six month angiographic and clinical follow-up of a prospective randomized study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 124:130-5.nGersbach P, Imsand C, von Segesser LK, Delabays A, Vogt P, Stumpe F. 2001. Beating heart coronary artery surgery: is sternotomy a suitable alternative to minimal invasive technique? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 20:760-4.nHernandez F, Cohn WE, Baribeau YR, et al. 2001. In-hospital outcomes of off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass procedures: a multi-center experience. Ann Thorac Surg 72:1528-34.nLoop FD, Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM, et al. 1986. Influence of the internal mammary artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events. N Engl J Med 314:1-6.nMack MJ, Osborne JA, Shennib H. 1998. Arterial graft patency in coronary artery bypass grafting: what do we really know? Ann Thorac Surg 66:1055-9.nNg PC, Chua AN, Swanson MS, Koutlas TC, Chitwood WR, Elbeery JR. 2000. Anterior thoracotomy wound complications in minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 69:1338-41.nShenib H, Mack MJ, Lee AGL. 1997. A survey on minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 64:110-5.nStanbridge RDL, Hadjinikölaou LK. 1999. Technical adjuncts in beating heart surgery: comparision of MIDCAB to off-pump sternotomy--a meta-analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 16:S24-33.n

Published

2005-02-08

How to Cite

Vicol, C., Nollert, G., Mair, H., Samuel, V., Lim, C., Tiftikidis, M., Eifert, S., & Reichart, B. (2005). Midterm Results of Beating Heart Surgery in 1-Vessel Disease: Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass versus Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass with Full Sternotomy. The Heart Surgery Forum, 6(5), 341-344. https://doi.org/10.1532/hsf.958

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>