The Prevalence and Extent of Coronary Atherosclerosis among Patients with a Zero Calcium Score and the Influence of Patient Characteristics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1532/HSF98.20121132Abstract
Purpose: Coronary artery calcium (CAC) is a specific indicator of and an independent risk factor for atherosclerosis; however, calcium scoring may miss noncalcified plaques, which may have clinical importance. The aim of this study was both to identify the presence and extent of coronary plaques during computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) in patients with a zero CAC score and to evaluate the effect of risk factors and symptom status on the presence of noncalcified plaques.
Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, we analyzed the cases of 842 consecutive patients between October 2006 and November 2011. Of these patients, we included 357 with a zero calcium score in the study. Information regarding patient age, sex, coronary risk factors, and symptom status were recorded. Coronary calcium-scoring scans were followed by CTCA. The calcium scores were calculated, and the presence of noncalcified plaques and significant stenoses (>50% of vessel diameter) was evaluated.
Results: Of the 357 patients with a zero calcium score, 37 (10.36%) had atherosclerotic plaques; 9 patients (2.52%) had significant coronary stenosis. Among coronary risk factors, only diabetes mellitus was significantly correlated with any risk factors (presence of atherosclerosis and obstructive coronary artery disease; P = .030 and .013, respectively).
Conclusion: Although CAC scoring is a safe and a reliable test to exclude obstructive coronary artery disease, the absence of CAC does not definitively exclude the presence of atherosclerosis. CTCA is a more appropriate method for determining the atheroma burden.
References
Akram K, O'Donnell RE, King S, Superko HR, Agatston A, Voros S. 2009. Influence of symptomatic status on the prevalence of obstructive coronary artery disease in patients with zero calcium score. Atherosclerosis 203:533-7.nBudoff MJ, Gul K. 2008. Expert review on coronary calcium. Vasc Health Risk Manag 4:315-24.nBudoff MJ, McClelland RL, Nasir K, et al. 2009. Cardiovascular events with absent or minimal coronary calcification: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Am Heart J 158:554-61.nCademartiri F, Maffei E, Palumbo A, et al. 2010. Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with a zero calcium score. Eur Radiol 20:81-7.n[CEC] Commission of the European Communities. 2000. European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography. Luxemborg, Luxemborg: Office for the Official Publications of the European Communities; 2000. EUR 16262 EN. Available at: http://www.drs.dk/guidelines/ct/quality/htmlindex.htm'>http://www.drs.dk/guidelines/ct/quality/htmlindex.htmnChoi EK, Choi SI, Rivera JJ, et al. 2008. Coronary computed tomography angiography as a screening tool for the detection of occult coronary artery disease in asymptomatic individuals. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:357-65.nDiamond GA, Forrester JS. 1979. Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 300:1350-8.nDrosch T, Brodoefel H, Reimann A, et al. 2010. Prevalence and clinical characteristics of symptomatic patients with obstructive coronary artery disease in the absence of coronary calcifications. Acad Radiol 17:1254-8.nErgün E, Ko?ar P, Oztürk C, Ba?bay E, Koç F, Ko?ar U. 2011. Prevalence and extent of coronary artery disease determined by 64-slice CTA in patients with zero coronary calcium score. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:451-8.nGottlieb I, Miller JM, Arbab-Zadeh A, et al. 2010. The absence of coronary calcification does not exclude obstructive coronary artery disease or the need for revascularization in patients referred for conventional coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 55:627-34.nHausleiter J, Meyer T, Hermann F, et al. 2009. Estimated radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography. JAMA 301:500-7.nKelly JL, Thickman D, Abramson SD, et al. 2008. Coronary CT angiography findings in patients without coronary calcification. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:50-5.nNikolaou K, Sagmeister S, Knez A, et al. 2003. Multidetector-row computed tomography of the coronary arteries: predictive value and quantitative assessment of non-calcified vessel wall changes. Eur Radiol 13:2505-12.nOudkerk M, Stillman AE, Halliburton SS, et al. 2008. Coronary artery calcium screening: current status and recommendations from the European Society of Cardiac Radiology and North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Radiol 18:2785-807.nPark EA, Lee W, Kim KG, et al. 2011. Iterative reconstruction of dualsource coronary CT angiography: assessment of image quality and radiation dose. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 28:1775-86.nSarwar A, Shaw LJ, Shapiro MD, et al. 2009. Diagnostic and prognostic value of absence of coronary artery calcification. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2:675-88.nSrichai MB, Lim RP, Donnino R, et al. 2012. Low dose prospective triggered high-pitch spiral computed tomography angiography: comparison with retrospective spiral technique. Acad Radiol 19:554-61.nTaylor AJ, Cerqueira M, Hodgson JM, et al. 2010. ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCMR 2010 appropriate use criteria for cardiac computed tomography. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. Circulation 122:e525-55.nUretsky S, Rozanski A, Singh P, et al. 2011. The presence, characterization and prognosis of coronary plaques among patients with zero coronary calcium scores. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:805-12.n
