A Modified Combined Approach to Operative Carotid and Coronary Artery Disease: 82 Cases in 8 Years


  • Bayer Cinar
  • Onur S. Goksel
  • Sinan Kut
  • Veysel Sahin
  • Yavuz Enc
  • Ilhan Oztekin
  • Abdurrahman Eksik
  • Ergin Eren




Background: A significant number of patients undergoing coronary artery surgery have severe carotid artery disease. It is also true that up to half of the patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) have severe treatable coronary lesions. This study aims to review data regarding 82 patients of combined approach in 8 years; the second half consists of 44 patients whose CEA was performed under local anesthesia. It compares results of the conventional and the modified approaches to simultaneous surgery.

Methods: All 82 patients who planned to have a concomitant procedure were recorded prospectively between 1995 and 2003. From 1998, the surgical technique has been modified to switch to local anesthesia for CEA, rather than perform under a single general anesthetic period. All pre-and perioperative data as well as in-hospital and outpatient control (mid- to long-term) data were recorded. A P-value of less than .05 was considered as significant. Analysis of survival was performed by using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test.

Results: The 30-day follow-up was 100% complete for all patients. All patients were followed for 59.59 to 114 months) months postoperatively. Three patients (6.8%) in the modified and 2 (5.2%) in the standard group had intraluminal shunting (P > .05). In the standard group, 3 patients expired and 3 had perioperative stroke; only 1 patient had a stroke in the modified group and two expired (P > .05). Mean survival time according to Kaplan-Meier test was 109.97, SE 2.84, 95% CI (104.41-115.52) months for the former group, whereas it was 62.79, SE 1.20, 95% CI (60.4565.13) months for the latter. Actuarial estimates of survival during ten-year follow up were 94.44% SE 3.83 in ten-year follow-ups and 97.67% SE 2.30 in 5-year follow-ups for the modified group (P > .05).

Conclusions: Avoidance from extended periods of general anesthesia and cardiopulmonary bypass periods as well as immediate recognition of impaired cerebral flow during CEA


Antunes PE, Anacleto G, Oliviera F, Eugenio L, Antunes MJ. 2002. Staged carotid and coronary surgery for concomitant carotid and coronary artery disease. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 21:181-6.nBerens ES, Kouchoukos NT, Murphy SF, Wareing TH. 1992. Preoperative carotid artery screening in elderly patients undergoing cardiac surgery. J Vasc Surg 15(2):313-23.nBonacchi M, Prifti E, Frati G, et al. 2002. Concomitant carotid endarterectomy and coronary bypass surgery: should cardiopulmonary bypass be used for the carotid procedure? J Card Surg 17(1):51-9.nCASS Principal Investigators and Their Associates. 1983. Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS): A randomized trial of coronary bypass surgery. Survival Data. Circulation 68(5):939-50.nCinar B, Goksel OS, Karatepe C, et al. 2004. Routine shunting necessary for carotid endarterectomy in patients with contralateral occlusion? A review of 5-year experience of carotid endarterectomy with local anesthesia. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 28(5):494-9.nExecutive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. 1995. Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. JAMA 273(18):1421-8.nFagglioli GL, Curl GR, Ricotta JJ. 1990. The role of carotid screening before coronary artery bypass. J Vasc Surg 12(6):724-31.nGardner TJ, Horneffer PJ, Manolio TA, Hoff SJ, Pearson TA. 1986. Major stroke after coronary artery bypass surgery: changing magnitude of the problem. J Vasc Surg 3(4):684-7.nGurer O, Yapici F, Enc Y, Cinar B, Ketenci B, Ozler A. 2003. Local versus general anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy: a report of 329 cases. Vasc Endovasc Surg 37(3):171-7.nHertzer NR, Flanagan RA, O'Hara PJ, Beven EG. 1986. Surgical versus nonoperative treatment of asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Ann Surg 204(2):163-71.nHertzer NR, Loop FD, Beven EG, O'Hara PJ, Krajewski LP. 1989. Surgical staging for simultaneous coronary and carotid disease: a study including prospective randomization. J Vasc Surg 9(3):455-63.nHertzer NR, Young JR, Beven EG, et al. 1985. Coronary angiography in 506 patients with extracranial cerebrovascular disease. Arch Intern Med 145(5):849-52.nLikosky DS, Leavitt BJ, Marrin CA, et al. 2003. Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group. Intra- and postoperative predictors of stroke after coronary bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 76(2):428-34.nMackey WC, O'Donnell TF, Callow AD. 1990. Cardiac risk in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy: impact on perioperative and long term mortality. J Vasc Surg 11:226-34.nMcCarthy R, Trigg R, John C, Gough MJ, Horrocks M. 2004. Patient satisfaction for carotid endarterectomy performed under local anesthesia. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 27(6):654-9.nMcCarthy RJ, Nasr MK, McAteer P, Horrock M. 2002. Physiological advantages of cerebral blood flow during carotid endarterectomy under local anesthesia. Eur Vasc Endovasc Surg 24(3):215-21.nNorth American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. 1991. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 325:345-53.nTuman KJ, McCarthy RJ, Najafi H, Ivankowitch AD. 1992. Differential effects of advanced age on neurologic and cardiac risks of coronary artery operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 104(6): 1510-7.n



How to Cite

Cinar, B., Goksel, O. S., Kut, S., Sahin, V., Enc, Y., Oztekin, I., Eksik, A., & Eren, E. (2005). A Modified Combined Approach to Operative Carotid and Coronary Artery Disease: 82 Cases in 8 Years. The Heart Surgery Forum, 8(3), E184-E189. https://doi.org/10.1532/HSF98.20051003




Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>