A New Clip Device for the Construction of Vascular Interrupted Anastomoses in Congenital Cardiac Surgery
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1532/hsf.834Abstract
Background: Many different mechanical vascular anastomotic devices have been developed recently, mostly rigid stenting mechanisms applicable only in coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. U-Clips, however, allow the precise construction of any vascular interrupted anastomosis, preserving pulsatility and perhaps growth potential.
Methods: We report the first use worldwide of U-Clips for congenital cardiac surgery in 10 pediatric patients (mean age, 2.3 ± 1.7 years). The operations took place between July 2001 and July 2002 for coarctation repair (3 patients), Glenn shunt (5 patients), Blalock-Taussig shunt (1 patient), and arterial switch (1 patient).
Results: Device handling, primary hemostasis, and patency were excellent, and no device-related complications occurred. Because of the learning curve, aortic cross-clamp times were significantly longer for the repair of coarctation with U-Clips than with the running-suture technique (21.7 ± 2.3 minutes versus 14.4 ± 2 minutes; P = .012). Postoperative recoveries were uneventful in all patients except for a baby with pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum, who died after 62 days. After a mean follow-up period of 11.9 ± 4.4 months, echocardiographic controls of all anastomoses showed nonturbulent flow without any restriction.
Conclusion: The U-Clip device may be a useful adjunct in congenital cardiac surgery for facilitating the creation of interrupted vascular anastomoses. Further evaluation is warranted for determining the long-term benefits of these devices with respect to growth preservation and restenosis.
References
Soejima Y, Yanaga K, Nishizaki T, Yoshizumi T, Uchiyama H, Sugimachi K. 1997. The fate of non-absorbable suture in growing vascular anastomoses in liver transplantation. Hepatogastroenterology 44:227-30.nTons C, Armbrecht J, Bircks W. 1986. The use of synthetic absorbable suture materials (polyglycolic acid and polydioxanone) in the low pressure circulatory system of growing organisms. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 34:128-31.nTorsello G, Schwartz A, Aulich A, Sandmann W. 1987. Absorbable polydioxanone suture for venous anastomoses: experimental studies using venography and transluminal angioscopy. Eur J Vasc Surg 1:319-25.nTozzi P, Hayoz D, Ruchat P, et al. 2001. Animal model to compare the effects of suture technique on cross-sectional compliance on end-to-side anastomoses. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 19:477-81.nvon Segesser LK, Lachat M, Duewell S, Gianom D, Turina MI. 1996. Improved growth with bioabsorbable sutures in both high- and low-pressure zones. Ann Thorac Surg 62:1045-9; discussion 1049-50.nWilliams WG, Quaegebeur JM, Kirklin JW, Blackstone EH. 1997. Outflow obstruction after the arterial switch operation: a multiinstitutional study: Congenital Heart Surgeons Society. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 114:975-87; discussion 987-90.nAmato JJ, Douglas WI, James T, Desai U. 2000. Coarctation of the aorta. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu 3:125-41.nBaumgartner N, Dobrin PB, Morasch M, Dong QS, Mrkvicka R. 1996. Influence of suture technique and suture material selection on the mechanics of end-to-end and end-to-side anastomoses. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 111:1063-72.nGillinov AM, Lee AW, Redmond JM, et al. 1992. Absorbable suture improves growth of venous anastomoses. J Vasc Surg 16:769-73.nHawkins JA, Minich LL, Tani LY, Ruttenberg HD, Sturtevant JE, McGough EC. 1995. Absorbable polydioxanone suture and results in total anomalous pulmonary venous connection. Ann Thorac Surg 60:55-9.nHill AC, Maroney TP, Virmani R. 2001. Facilitated coronary anastomosis using a nitinol U-Clip device: bovine model. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 121:859-70.nLosay J, Touchot A, Serraf A, et al. 2001. Late outcome after arterial switch operation for transposition of the great arteries. Circulation 104:I-121-6.nNakashima S, Sugimoto H, Inoue M, Karashima S, Onitsuka T, Koga Y. 1991. Growth of the aortic anastomosis in puppies: comparison of monofilament suture materials, whether absorbable or nonabsorbable, and of suture techniques, whether continuous or interrupted [in Japanese]. Nippon Geka Gakkai Zasshi 92:206-13.nOno M, Wolf RK, Angouras D, Schneeberger EW. 2002. Early experience of coronary artery bypass grafting with a new self-closing clip device. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 123:783-7.nPae WE Jr, Waldhausen JA, Prophet GA, Pierce WS. 1981. Primary vascular anastomosis in growing pigs: comparison of polypropylene and polyglycolic acid sutures. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 81:921-7.nBerdat PA, Kipfer B, Immer FF, Pfammatter JP, Carrel T. 2002. Facilitated vascular interrupted anastomosis in cardiovascular surgery with a new clip device. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 124:1256-8.nCaskey MP, Kirshner MS, Alderman EL, Hunsley SL, Daniel MA. 2002. Six-month angiographic evaluation of beating-heart coronary arterial graft interrupted anastomoses using the coalescent U-CLIP anastomotic device: a prospective clinical study. Heart Surg Forum 5:319-26; discussion 327.nChen LE, Seaber AV, Urbaniak JR. 1993. Microvascular anastomoses in growing vessels: a long-term evaluation of nonabsorbable suture materials. J Reconstr Microsurg 9:183-9.nChiu IS, Hung CR, Chao SF, Huang SH, How SW. 1988. Growth of the aortic anastomosis in pigs: comparison of continuous absorbable suture with nonabsorbable suture. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 95:112-8.nGerdisch MW. 2002. Improved coronary anastomotic quality using the U-Clip interrupted technique. Paper presented at: NewEra Cardiac Care Conference; January 2002; Dana Point, California, USA.n
