On-Pump Beating Heart Surgery Offers an Alternative for Unstable Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

  • James R. Edgerton
  • Morley A. Herbert
  • Katherine K. Jones
  • Syma L. Prince
  • Tea Acuff
  • David Carter
  • Todd Dewey
  • Mitchell Magee
  • Michael Mack

Abstract

Background: Cardiac surgery has expanded the available approaches to aortocoronary artery bypass grafting to include approaches from minimally invasive surgery to full sternotomy. The heart can be arrested, left beating, or assisted with a right ventricular assist device or cardiopulmonary bypass pump. We have examined the 4 surgical modes that we use routinely in our large multisurgeon practice to determine our selection biases and the outcomes of the different techniques. Methods: Of the 4733 coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) patients we studied from January 2000 through December 2002, 2332 (49.3%) operations were done on-pump on the arrested heart, 1908 (40.3%) were performed off-pump, 364 (7.7%) were performed on-pump on the beating heart, and 129 (2.7%) were performed with right heart assist. The preoperative risk factors, operative variables, and postoperative outcomes of the groups were analyzed. Results: Patients selected for on-pump beating heart procedures tended to be sicker with the highest predicted risk of death. We also selected patients who were in cardiogenic shock, in resuscitation, in emergent or salvage status, on dialysis, and with preoperative intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) use for on-pump beating heart procedures at higher than expected rates. Patients with renal failure with or without dialysis, and those having a history of cerebrovascular accident tended not to be chosen for on-pump arrested heart procedures. Off-pump beating heart procedures were avoided for patients with cardiogenic shock or resuscitation, in emergent or salvage status, and with preoperative IABP use. The mortality rate in these patients was slightly worse in the on-pump beating heart group (4.4%) than in the on-pump arrested heart (3.5%) and off-pump (2.3%) groups (analysis of variance [ANOVA], P = .04). Atrial fibrillation occurred more frequently in both the on-pump beating heart (20.1%) and on-pump arrested heart (23.8%) groups (ANOVA, P < .001). The on-pump groups had higher rates of blood product use and reoperation for bleeding and a prolonged ventilation rate, compared with the other procedures. On-pump patients had a statistically longer length of stay than either off-pump or right heart-assisted patients (P < .05) and required longer times on the ventilator and in the intensive care unit. Conclusions: Normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass with a beating heart is safe and efficacious and may be the method of choice for patients in cardiogenic shock, requiring resuscitation, or with previous CABG surgery, recent myocardial infarction, a low ejection fraction, or unstable arrhythmias.

References

Szmagala P, Morawski W, Krejca M, Gburek T, Bochenek A. 1998. Evaluation of perioperative myocardial tissue damage in ischemically preconditioned human heart during aorto coronary bypass surgery. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 39:791-5.\nTasdemir O, Vural KM, Karagoz H, Bayazit K. 1998. Coronary artery bypass grafting on the beating heart without the use of extracorporeal circulation: review of 2052 cases. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 116:68-73.\nJazayeri S, Tatou E, Gomez Bielefeld MC, et al. 2003. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting decreases mortality and morbidity in high-risk patients [abstract]. Heart Surg Forum 6(suppl 1):S43.\nJones EL, Weintraub WS. 1996. The importance of completeness of revascularization during long-term follow-up after coronary artery operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 112:227-37.\nKim KB, Kang CH, Chang WI, et al. 2002. Off-pump coronary artery bypass with complete avoidance of aortic manipulation. Ann Thorac Surg 74:S1377-82.\nKrejca M, Skiba J, Szmagala P, Gburek T, Bochenek A. 1999. Cardiactroponin T release during coronary surgery using intermittent cross-clamp with fibrillation, on-pump and off-pump beating heart. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 16:337-41.\nMack M, Bachand D, Acuff T, et al. 2002. Improved outcomes in coronary artery bypass grafting with beating-heart techniques. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 124:598-607.\nMartin TD, Craver JM, Gott JP, et al. 1994. Prospective, randomized trial of retrograde warm blood cardioplegia: myocardial benefit and neurologic threat. Ann Thorac Surg 57:298-302; discussion, 302-4.\nMartin TD, Craver JM, Gott JP, et al. 1994. Prospective, randomized trial of retrograde warm blood cardioplegia: myocardial benefit and neurologic threat. Ann Thorac Surg 57:298-302; discussion, 302-4.\nPerrault LP, Menasche P, Peynet J, et al. 1997. On-pump, beating-heart coronary artery operations in high-risk patients: an acceptable trade-off? Ann Thorac Surg 64:1368-73.\nPotger KC, McMillan D, Connolly T, Southwell J, Dando H, O'Shaughnessy K. 2002. Coronary artery bypass grafting: an off-pump versus on-pump review. J Extra Corpor Technol 34:260-6.\nSabik JF, Gillinov AM, Blackstone EH, et al. 2002. Does off-pump coronary surgery reduce morbidity and mortality? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 124:698-707.\nScott R, Blackstone EH, McCarthy PM, et al. 2000. Isolated bypass grafting of the left internal thoracic artery to the left anterior descending coronary artery: late consequences of incomplete revascularization. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 120:173-84.\nShennib H, Endo M, Benhamed O, Morin JF. 2002. Surgical revascularization in patients with poor left ventricular function: on- or off-pump? Ann Thorac Surg 74:S1344-7.\nAldea GS, Goss JR, Boyle EM Jr, Quinton RR, Maynard C. 2003. Use of off-pump and on-pump CABG strategies in current clinical practice: the Clinical Outcomes Assessment Program of the State of Washington. J Card Surg 18:206-15.\nAscione R, Lloyd CT, Gomes WJ, Caputo M, Bryan AJ, Angelini GD. 1999. Beating versus arrested heart revascularization: evaluation of myocardial function in a prospective randomized study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 15:685-90.\nBell MR, Gersh BJ, Schaff HV, et al. 1992. Effect of completeness of revascularization on long-term outcome of patients with three-vessel disease undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: a report from the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) Registry. Circulation 86:446-57.\nBhatti F, Desmond J, Chaisty S, Keenan D. 2003. A comparison of on and off pump re-do coronary artery bypass surgery. Heart Surg Forum 6(suppl 1):S42-3.\nCaputo M, Yeatman M, Narayan P, et al. 2002. Effect of off-pump coronary surgery with right ventricular assist device on organ function and inflammatory response: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Thorac Surg 74:2088-95; discussion, 2095-6.\nDemaria RG, Carrier M, Fortier S, et al. 2002. Reduced mortality and strokes with off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting surgery in octogenarians. Circulation 106:I-5-10.\n
Published
2005-01-04
How to Cite
Edgerton, J. R., Herbert, M. A., Jones, K. K., Prince, S. L., Acuff, T., Carter, D., Dewey, T., Magee, M., & Mack, M. (2005). On-Pump Beating Heart Surgery Offers an Alternative for Unstable Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. The Heart Surgery Forum, 7(1), E88-E95. https://doi.org/10.1532/hsf.764
Section
Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)