Preoperative Malnutrition Calculated Using the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index in Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Authors

  • Sho Takagi Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Toyohashi Heart Center, 441-8530 Toyohashi, Japan
  • Yui Ogihara Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Toyohashi Heart Center, 441-8530 Toyohashi, Japan
  • Junji Yanagisawa Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Toyohashi Heart Center, 441-8530 Toyohashi, Japan
  • Yoshihiro Goto Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Toyohashi Heart Center, 441-8530 Toyohashi, Japan
  • Yasuhide Okawa Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Toyohashi Heart Center, 441-8530 Toyohashi, Japan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59958/hsf.7527

Keywords:

coronary artery bypass grafting, malnutrition, Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index

Abstract

Background: The Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI), which assesses nutritional status using the ideal body weight ratio and albumin level, is a useful predictor of long-term cardiovascular disease prognosis. This study aimed to investigate the impact of preoperative GNRI on off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgical outcomes. Methods: We analyzed 632 elective OPCAB procedures performed between July 2008 and July 2018. GNRI was calculated as 14.89 × albumin level (g/dL) + 41.7 × (current body weight [kg]/ideal body weight [kg]). Patients were divided into two groups: the low GNRI (≤98, L group, n = 155) and high GNRI (>98, H group, n = 477) groups. We compared perioperative variables and mid-term outcomes, particularly survival rates and freedom from major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (MACCE). Results: Patients in the L group were older (72.4 ± 8.6 vs. 67.9 ± 10.1 years, p < 0.001) and had lower GNRI scores (90.9 ± 5.8 vs. 106.0 ± 4.8, p < 0.001) than patients in the H group. Perioperative results, including operation time and number of anastomoses, were similar between the groups, with no significant differences in 30-day mortality, perioperative intra-aortic balloon pump use, bleeding, stroke, or mediastinitis rates were observed. However, patients in the L group had a longer postoperative hospital stay than those in the H group (15.4 ± 13.5 vs. 12.6 ± 5.8 days, p = 0.01). Analyses of long-term outcomes revealed a significant difference in 5-year survival rates (70.9% for the L group vs. 83.3% for the H group, p = 0.002) but no significant difference in 5-year MACCE rates (84.1% for the L group vs. 80.3% for the H group, p = 0.19). Conclusions: Despite the longer hospital stay for patients in the L group, other perioperative outcomes were similar between the groups, suggesting that a low GNRI should not preclude patients from undergoing OPCAB surgery.

References

Unosawa S, Taoka M, Osaka S, Yuji D, Kitazumi Y, Suzuki K, et al. Is malnutrition associated with postoperative complications after cardiac surgery? Journal of Cardiac Surgery. 2019; 34: 908–912.

Tóth K, Szabó A, Menyhárd J, Benke K, Radovits T, Pólos M, et al. Poor Preoperative Nutritional Status, but Not Hormone Levels, Are Associated With Mortality After Cardiac Surgery. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. 2022; 36: 3074–3083.

Marui A, Nishiwaki N, Komiya T, Hanyu M, Tanaka S, Kimura T, et al. Comparison of 5-Year Outcomes After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Heart Failure Patients With Versus Without Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (from the CREDO-Kyoto CABG Registry Cohort-2). The American Journal of Cardiology. 2015; 116: 580–586.

Velazquez EJ, Williams JB, Yow E, Shaw LK, Lee KL, Phillips HR, et al. Long-term survival of patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy treated by coronary artery bypass grafting versus medical therapy. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2012; 93: 523–530.

Yamamoto K, Tsuchihashi-Makaya M, Kinugasa Y, Iida Y, Kamiya K, Kihara Y, et al. Japanese Heart Failure Society 2018 Scientific Statement on Nutritional Assessment and Management in Heart Failure Patients. Circulation Journal. 2020; 84: 1408–1444.

Li H, Zhou P, Zhao Y, Ni H, Luo X, Li J. Prediction of all-cause mortality with malnutrition assessed by controlling nutritional status score in patients with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Public Health Nutrition. 2021; 25: 1–8.

Cheng YL, Sung SH, Cheng HM, Hsu PF, Guo CY, Yu WC, et al. Prognostic Nutritional Index and the Risk of Mortality in Patients With Acute Heart Failure. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2017; 6: e004876.

Bouillanne O, Morineau G, Dupont C, Coulombel I, Vincent JP, Nicolis I, et al. Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index: a new index for evaluating at-risk elderly medical patients. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2005; 82: 777–783.

Tasbulak O, Guler A, Duran M, Sahin A, Bulut U, Avci Y, et al. Association Between Nutritional Indices and Long-Term Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. Cureus. 2021; 13: e16567.

Gilbey T, Milne B, de Somer F, Kunst G. Neurologic complications after cardiopulmonary bypass - A narrative review. Perfusion. 2023; 38: 1545–1559.

Attaran S, Shaw M, Bond L, Pullan MD, Fabri BM. Does off-pump coronary artery revascularization improve the long-term survival in patients with ventricular dysfunction? Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery. 2010; 11: 442–446.

Diegeler A, Hirsch R, Schneider F, Schilling LO, Falk V, Rauch T, et al. Neuromonitoring and neurocognitive outcome in off-pump versus conventional coronary bypass operation. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2000; 69: 1162–1166.

Bucerius J, Gummert JF, Walther T, Schmitt DV, Doll N, Falk V, et al. On-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: impact on postoperative renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2004; 77: 1250–1256.

Puskas JD, Williams WH, Duke PG, Staples JR, Glas KE, Marshall JJ, et al. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting provides complete revascularization with reduced myocardial injury, transfusion requirements, and length of stay: a prospective randomized comparison of two hundred unselected patients undergoing off-pump versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2003; 125: 797–808.

Mack M, Bachand D, Acuff T, Edgerton J, Prince S, Dewey T, et al. Improved outcomes in coronary artery bypass grafting with beating-heart techniques. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2002; 124: 598–607.

Arom KV, Flavin TF, Emery RW, Kshettry VR, Janey PA, Petersen RJ. Safety and efficacy of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2000; 69: 704–710.

Beckermann J, Van Camp J, Li S, Wahl SK, Collins A, Herzog CA. On-pump versus off-pump coronary surgery outcomes in patients requiring dialysis: perspectives from a single center and the United States experience. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2006; 131: 1261–1266.

Shen ZL, Liu Z, Zang WF, Zhang P, Zou HB, Dong WX, et al. Thoracic sarcopenia predicts clinical outcomes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: A 6-year cohort study. Asian Journal of Surgery. 2023; 46: 291–298.

Okamura H, Kimura N, Mieno M, Yuri K, Yamaguchi A. Preoperative sarcopenia is associated with late mortality after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 2020; 58: 121–129.

Published

2024-08-14

How to Cite

Takagi, S., Ogihara, Y. ., Yanagisawa, J. ., Goto, Y. ., & Okawa, Y. . (2024). Preoperative Malnutrition Calculated Using the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index in Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. The Heart Surgery Forum, 27(8), E891-E897. https://doi.org/10.59958/hsf.7527

Issue

Section

Article