Pulmonary Vein Isolation by Robotic-Enhanced Thoracoscopy for Symptomatic Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1532/HSF98.20041107Abstract
Background: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has been shown to be effective treatment of patients with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). The percutaneous approach is currently the technique of choice. Unfortunately, this procedure has limitations and complications that lead to fluctuating success rates. We explored an alternative technique of robotic-enhanced, closed-chest PVI with an endoscopic microwave-based catheter.
Methods: Seven symptomatic PAF patients were included in the study. The pulmonary veins were isolated through right (only) robotic-enhanced thoracoscopy on the beating heart.
Results: Six patients underwent successful endoscopic PVI. In 1 patient the operation was converted into small right thoracotomy. Operative assessment of the ablation line showed a successful electric block in every patient. Three months after the procedure, the first 5 patients were in permanent sinus rhythm. The 2 other patients had AF but had less frequent and less symptomatic episodes compared with the preoperative situation.
Conclusions: On the basis of this preliminary experience, we believe that in the near future endoscopic right-chest robotic-enhanced PVI on the beating heart may become a valid option in the treatment of symptomatic PAF patients. This procedure allows for more-reproducible ablation lines and may avoid many of the pitfalls and drawbacks of the percutaneous approach. Therefore this technique deserves larger prospective evaluation in the treatment of AF.
References
Chiappini B, Martin-Suarez S, LoForte A, Arpesella G, Di Bartolomeo R, Marinelli G. 2004. Cox/maze III operation versus radiofrequency ablation for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation: a comparative study. Ann Thorac Surg 77:87-92.nDe Cannière D. 2003 The closed chest coronary surgery: state of the art. J Cardiovasc Surg 44:323-30.nHaissaguerre M, Jais P, Shah DC, et al. 1998. Spontaneous initiation of atrial fibrillation by ectopic beats originating in the pulmonary veins. N Engl J Med 339:659-66.nJansens JL, Jottrand M, Preumont N, Stoupel E, de Cannière D. 2003. Robotic enhanced epicardial lead implantation for cardiac resynchronization therapy. Ann Thorac Surg 76:413-7.nKypson AP, Nifong LW, Chitwood WR Jr. 2003. Robotic mitral valve surgery. Surg Clin North Am 83:1387-403.nO'Callaghan PA, Meara M, Kongsgaard E, et al. 2001. Symptomatic improvement after radiofrequency catheter ablation for typical atrial flutter. Heart 86:167-71.nOral H, Scharf C, Chugh A, et al. 2003. Catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: segmental pulmonary vein ostial ablation versus left atrial ablation. Circulation 108:2355-60.nPappone C, Oreto G, Rosanio S, et al. 2001. Atrial electroanatomic remodeling after circumferential radiofrequency pulmonary vein ablation: efficacy of an anatomic approach in a large cohort of patients with atrial fibrillation. Circulation 104:2539-44.nPappone C, Rosanio S, Oreto G, et al. 2000. Circumferential radiofrequency ablation of pulmonary vein ostia: a new anatomic approach for curing atrial fibrillation. Circulation 102:2619-28.nPrasad SM, Maniar HS, Camillo CJ, et al. 2003. The Cox maze III procedure for atrial fibrillation: long-term efficacy in patients undergoing lone versus concomitant procedures. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 126:1822-8.nRoux N, Havet E, Mertl P. 2004. The myocardial sleeves of the pul>monary veins: potential implications for atrial fibrillation. Surg Radiol Anat 26:285-9.nSaad EB, Rossillo A, Saad CP, et al. 2003. Pulmonary vein stenosis after radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation: functional characterization, evolution, and influence of the ablation strategy. Circulation 108:3102-7.nTada H, Naito S, Kurosaki K, et al. 2003. Segmental pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation improves quality of life and clinical outcomes. Circ J 67:861-5.n
