Ventricular Reshaping with Devices


  • Soren Schenk
  • Hermann Reichenspurner



Device-based left ventricular reshaping to facilitate reverse remodeling in cases of congestive heart failure represents an innovative surgical strategy. Originating from experiences gained with partial left ventriculectomy and dynamic cardiomyoplasty, the Myocor Myosplint device and the Acorn CorCap Cardiac Support Device are intended to improve left ventricle function through left ventricular shape change by means of wall stress reduction and passive diastolic support, respectively. Encouraging experimental and early clinical results with both devices support these novel concepts. Careful patient selection and a combined approach integrating adjunct surgical and medical treatments are crucial factors for the success of ventricular reshaping.


left ventricle: a simple finite element analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 116:566-77.nChaudry PA, Mishima T, Sharov VG, et al. 2000. Passive epicardial containment prevents ventricular remodeling in heart failure. Ann Thorac Surg 70:1275-80.nFranco-Cereceda A, McCarthy PM, Blackstone EH, et al. 2001. Partial left ventriculectomy for dilated cardiomyopathy: is this an alternative to transplantation? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 121:879-93.nFukamachi K, Inoue M, Doi K, et al. [In press]. Device-based left ventricular geometry change for heart failure treatment: developmental work and current status. J Card Surg.nFukamachi K, McCarthy PM, Powell B. 2002. The Myosplint implant procedure. In: Cox JL, editor. Operative techniques in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery: a comparative atlas. Vol. 7, No. 2. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders. p 90-102.nGupta RC, Sharov VG, Mishra S, et al. 2001. Chronic therapy with the Acorn Cardiac Support Device attenuates cardiomyocyte apoptosis in dogs with heart failure [abstract]. J Am Coll Cardiol 37:478.nInoue M, McCarthy PM, Takagaki M, et al. 2002. Energetic advantages of device-based left ventricular shape change [abstract]. ASAIO J 48:136.nKass DA, Baughman KL, Pak PH, et al. 1995. Reverse remodeling from cardiomyoplasty in human heart failure: external constraint versus active assist. Circulation 91:2314-8.nPilla JJ, Blom AS, Brockman DJ, et al. 2002. Ventricular constraint using the Acorn Cardiac Support Device reduces myocardial akinetic area in an ovine model of acute infarction. Circulation 106:I207-11.nPower JM, Raman J, Dornom A, et al. 1999. Passive ventricular constraint amends the course of heart failure: a study in an ovine model of dilated cardiomyopathy. Cardiovasc Res 44:549-55.nRaman JS, Hata M, Storer M, et al. 2001. The mid-term results of ventricular containment (ACORN WRAP) for end-stage ischemic cardiomyopathy. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 7:278-81.nRatcliffe MB, Jong J, Salahieh A, Ruch S, Wallace AW. 1998. The effect of ventricular volume reduction surgery in the dilated, poorly contractilenSaavedra WF, Tunin RS, Paolocci N, et al. 2002. Reverse remodeling and enhanced adrenergic reserve from passive external support in experimental dilated heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 39:2069-76.nSabbah HN, Gupta RC, Mishra S, et al. 2000. Prevention of progressive left ventricular dilatation with Acorn cardiac support device downregulates stretch-mediated p21ras, attenuates myocyte hypertrophy and improves sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium cycling in dogs with heart failure [abstract]. Circulation 102:II683.nSchenk S, Reichenspurner H, Boehm DH, et al. 2002. Myosplint implant and shape-change procedure: intra- and peri-operative safety and feasibility. J Heart Lung Transplant 21:680-6.nTakagaki M. 2002. Myosplint and CorCap [in Japanese]. In: Sano S, editor. Challenges to the advanced heart failure [in Japanese]. Cardioangiology 52:238-45.nTakagaki M, McCarthy PM, Ochiai Y, et al. 2001. Novel device to change left ventricular shape for heart failure treatment: device design and implantation procedure. ASAIO J 47:244-8.nBatista RJV, Santos JVL, Takeshita N, Bocchino L, Lima PN, Cunha MA. 1996. Partial left ventriculectomy to improve left ventricular function in end-stage heart disease. J Card Surg 11:96-8.nKleber FX, Sonntag S, Krebs H, et al. 2000. Influence of the passive Acorn cardiac support device on systolic and diastolic left ventricular function [abstract]. J Am Coll Cardiol 37:182A.nKonertz W, Dushe S, Hotz H, et al. 2001. Safety and feasibility of a cardiac support device. J Card Surg 16:113-7.nKonertz WF, Kleber FX, Dushe S, et al. 2001. Efficacy trends with the Acorn cardiac support device: one year follow-up [abstract]. Circulation 104:II357.nKonertz WF, Shapland JE, Hotz H, et al. 2001. Passive containment and reverse remodeling by a novel textile cardiac support device. Circulation 104:I270-5.nMcCarthy PM, Fukamachi K, Takagaki M, et al. 2000. Left ventricular shape change reduced left ventricular wall stress in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy [abstract]. Circulation 102:II683.nMcCarthy PM, Takagaki M, Ochiai Y, et al. 2001. Device-based change in left ventricular shape: a new concept for the treatment of dilated cardiomyopathy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 122:482-90.nOz MZ. 2001. Passive ventricular constraint for the treatment of congestive heart failure. Ann Thorac Surg 71:S185-7.n



How to Cite

Schenk, S., & Reichenspurner, H. (2005). Ventricular Reshaping with Devices. The Heart Surgery Forum, 6(4), 237-243.




Most read articles by the same author(s)