A Meta-Analysis Comparing General Anesthesia, Deep Sedation, and Conscious Sedation for Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

Authors

  • Tingting Ye Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The First People's Hospital of Wenling, 317500 Wenling, Zhejiang, China
  • Yuncao Fan Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The First People's Hospital of Wenling, 317500 Wenling, Zhejiang, China
  • Jianzhi Shao Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The First People's Hospital of Wenling, 317500 Wenling, Zhejiang, China
  • Qizeng Wang Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The First People's Hospital of Wenling, 317500 Wenling, Zhejiang, China
  • Taotao Wang Department of Anesthesiology, Taizhou Municipal Hospital, 318000 Taizhou, Zhejiang, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59958/hsf.7153

Keywords:

meta-analysis, general anesthesia, deep sedation, conscious sedation, catheter ablation, atrial fibrillation, procedural time, complications, perioperative complications

Abstract

Background: The optimal anesthesia strategy during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) remains controversial. This meta-analysis compared general anesthesia, deep sedation, and conscious sedation in terms of procedural time and complications. Methods: Literature searches were conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases. Mean differences (MDs) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using fixed- and random-effect models on the basis of the heterogeneity among studies, as assessed by I2 statistics. The random-effect model was used when the heterogeneity was high (I2 > 50%). Publication bias was evaluated through funnel plots and Egger's tests. Results: Sixteen studies were included in this study. No significant difference was observed in procedural time between the general anesthesia and conscious sedation groups (MD: –8.1479 minutes, 95% CI: from –27.6836 to 11.3878, seven studies). Deep sedation was associated with procedural time (MD: 131.8436 minutes, 95% CI: 99.6540–164.0332, eight studies). The rate of serious intraprocedural complications was 1.5% (95% CI: 1.2%–1.9%) with deep sedation (seven studies). Conscious/analog sedation had 26%–29% higher odds of perioperative complications than general anesthesia (OR: 1.2622, 95% CI: 1.0273–1.5507, nine studies). Significant heterogeneity was present across studies. Conclusions: This meta-analysis found no significant difference in procedural time between general anesthesia and conscious sedation for AF ablation. Deep sedation was associated with longer procedural time. Conscious sedation appeared to have a higher risk of perioperative complications than general anesthesia. Further randomized trials are warranted to determine the optimal anesthesia strategy.

References

Penela D, Cappato R. How effective is cryoablation in the treatment of atrial fibrillation? European Heart Journal Supplements. 2021; 23: E51–E54.

Gorantla A, Alsaiqali M, Francois J, Sivakumar S, Freytes-Santiago L, Jallad A, et al. Comparative Effectiveness of Various Radiofrequency Ablation Catheters in the Ablation of Typical Atrial Flutter. Cardiology and Therapy. 2023; 12: 741–747.

Andrade JG, Khairy P, Dubuc M. Catheter cryoablation: biology and clinical uses. Circulation. Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. 2013; 6: 218–227.

Yu K, Yamashita T, Shingyochi S, Matsumoto K, Ohta M. Radiofrequency ablation with a vibrating catheter: A new method for electrode cooling. Medical Engineering & Physics. 2016; 38: 458–467.

Eick OJ. Factors influencing lesion formation during radiofrequency catheter ablation. Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal. 2003; 3: 117–128.

Zambouri A. Preoperative evaluation and preparation for anesthesia and surgery. Hippokratia. 2007; 11: 13–21.

Zhao J, Tan X, Wu X, Li J, Wang S, Qu R, et al. The efficacy and safety of general anesthesia vs. conscious sedation for endovascular treatment in patients with acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Neurology. 2023; 14: 1291730.

Dobson G, Chow L, Filteau L, Hurdle H, McIntyre I, Milne A, et al. Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia - Revised Edition 2021. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia. 2021; 68: 92–129.

Hara T, Ozawa A, Shibutani K, Tsujino K, Miyauchi Y, Kawano T, et al. Practical guide for safe sedation. Journal of Anesthesia. 2023; 37: 340–356.

Practice Guidelines for Moderate Procedural Sedation and Analgesia 2018: A Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Moderate Procedural Sedation and Analgesia, the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, American College of Radiology, American Dental Association, American Society of Dentist Anesthesiologists, and Society of Interventional Radiology. Anesthesiology. 2018; 128: 437–479.

Pang N, Gao J, Zhang N, Zhang B, Wang R. Comparison of the Different Anesthesia Strategies for Atrial Fibrillation Catheter Ablation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cardiology Research and Practice. 2022; 2022: 1124372.

Grimaldi M, Di Monaco A, Gomez T, Berman D, Datta K, Sharma T, et al. Time Course of Irreversible Electroporation Lesion Development Through Short- and Long-Term Follow-Up in Pulsed-Field Ablation-Treated Hearts. Circulation. Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. 2022; 15: e010661.

Wutzler A, Loehr L, Huemer M, Parwani AS, Steinhagen-Thiessen E, Boldt LH, et al. Deep sedation during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in elderly patients. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology. 2013; 38: 115–121.

Lortie CJ, Filazzola A. A contrast of meta and metafor packages for meta-analyses in R. Ecology and Evolution. 2020; 10: 10916–10921.

Chikata A, Kato T, Yaegashi T, Sakagami S, Kato C, Saeki T, et al. General anesthesia improves contact force and reduces gap formation in pulmonary vein isolation: a comparison with conscious sedation. Heart and Vessels. 2017; 32: 997–1005.

Wang Z, Jia L, Shi T, Liu C. General anesthesia is not superior to sedation in clinical outcome and cost-effectiveness for ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation. Clinical Cardiology. 2021; 44: 218–221.

Xu JJ, Gao LJ, Chang D, Xiao XJ, Zhang RF, Lin J, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcome comparison between atrial fibrillation patients underwent catheter ablation under general aesthesia or local anesthesia and sedation. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2017; 24: 935–939. (In Chinese)

Moravec O, Skala T, Klementova O, Skalova J, Hutyra M, Precek J, et al. General anesthesia or conscious sedation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation catheter ablation. Biomedical Papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czechoslovakia. 2021; 165: 162–168.

Traykov V, Marchov D, Marinov M, Boychev D, Gelev V. General anaesthesia during radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation is associated with improved procedural characteristics but with similar long-term outcomes: a single center study. EP Europace. 2021; 23: euab116.243.

Iacopino S, Colella J, Dini D, Mantovani L, Sorrenti PF, Malacrida M, et al. Sedation strategies for pulsed-field ablation of atrial fibrillation: focus on deep sedation with intravenous ketamine in spontaneous respiration. EP Europace. 2023; 25: euad230.

Kottkamp H, Hindricks G, Eitel C, Müller K, Siedziako A, Koch J, et al. Deep sedation for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a prospective study in 650 consecutive patients. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. 2011; 22: 1339–1343.

Foerschner L, Harfoush N, Thoma M, Spitzbauer L, Popa M, Bourier F, et al. Deep sedation with propofol in patients undergoing left atrial ablation procedures-Is it safe? Heart Rhythm O2. 2022; 3: 288–294.

Narui R, Matsuo S, Isogai R, Tokutake K, Yokoyama K, Kato M, et al. Impact of deep sedation on the electrophysiological behavior of pulmonary vein and non-PV firing during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology. 2017; 49: 51–57.

Bun SS, Latcu DG, Allouche E, Errahmouni A, Saoudi N. General anesthesia is not superior to local anesthesia for remote magnetic ablation of atrial fibrillation. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology. 2015; 38: 391–397.

Martin CA, Curtain JP, Gajendragadkar PR, Begley DA, Fynn SP, Grace AA, et al. Improved outcome and cost effectiveness in ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation under general anaesthetic. Europace. 2018; 20: 935–942.

Hama Y, Ishimura M, Yamamoto M, Himi T. P313General anesthesia improves the success rate of catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. EP Europace. 2017; 19.

Stašková K, Bulava A, Tesařík R, Toušek F. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation performed under general anesthesia: results of a unicentric randomized trial. Vnitrni Lekarstvi. 2017; 63: 163–169. (In Czech)

Braga A, Martins S, Ferreira AR, Fernandes J, Vieira T, Fontes L, et al. Influence of Deep Sedation in Intensive Care Medicine Memories of Critical COVID-19 Survivors. Journal of Intensive Care Medicine. 2023; 38: 657–667.

Löwhagen Hendén P, Rentzos A, Karlsson JE, Rosengren L, Leiram B, Sundeman H, et al. General Anesthesia Versus Conscious Sedation for Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke: The AnStroke Trial (Anesthesia During Stroke). Stroke. 2017; 48: 1601–1607.

Kent CD, Mashour GA, Metzger NA, Posner KL, Domino KB. Psychological impact of unexpected explicit recall of events occurring during surgery performed under sedation, regional anaesthesia, and general anaesthesia: data from the Anesthesia Awareness Registry. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2013; 110: 381–387.

Published

2024-07-16

How to Cite

Ye, T., Fan, . Y., Shao, J., Wang, Q., & Wang, T. (2024). A Meta-Analysis Comparing General Anesthesia, Deep Sedation, and Conscious Sedation for Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation. The Heart Surgery Forum, 27(7), E814-E827. https://doi.org/10.59958/hsf.7153

Issue

Section

Systematic Review