Mitral Valve Repair in Rheumatic Patients
Abstract
Background: There is controversy regarding the role of reparative techniques for rheumatic-mitral valve disease. We have analyzed the late results of mitral valve repair in a group of patients with rheumatic mitral valve insufficiency. Methods: From March 1980 to December 1997, 201 patients with rheumatic fever underwent mitral valve repair at the Heart Institute, Hospital das Clínicas, Medical School, University of São Paulo. The mean age of patients was 26.9 ± 15.4 years, with 59.7% of the patients being female. Other diagnoses were present in 67.7% of patients; the most common was tricuspid regurgitation (31.3%). Mitral valve repair techniques included: 1) Carpentier ring annuloplasty in 75 patients (37.3%); 2) posterior annuloplasty with bovine patch in 68 patients (33.8%); 3) posterior segmental annuloplasty in 16 patients (7.9%); 4) quadrangular resection of the posterior leaflet with ring plication in 11 patients (5.5%); 5) partial resection of the anterior leaflet in 6 patients (3%); 6) De Vega’s annuloplasty in 6 patients (3%); 7) Kay’s annuloplasty in 5 patients (2.5%); 8) Reed’s annuloplasty in 4 patients (2%); and 9) miscellaneous techniques in 10 patients (4.9%). Combined techniques were used in 94 patients (46.8%), the most frequent of which was chordal shortening (48 patients, 23.9%). Other non-mitral cardiac procedures were performed in 113 patients (56.2%). Actuarial survival and event-free curves (Kaplan-Meier method) were compared by linear regression analysis.
Results: The in-hospital mortality rate was 2.0% (four patients). The causes of death were multiorgan failure in two patients and low cardiac output in the other two patients. In the late postoperative period, 83.9% of the patients were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) func-tional class 1. The actuarial survival was 93.9% ± 1.9% at a mean of 125 months. Twenty-three patients were reoperat-ed in the postoperative period at a mean interval of 35.7 months. Survival free from reoperation was 43.3% ± 13.7%at 125 months. When analyzing the patients according to age, actuarial survival was 91.3% ± 3.8% in the group of patients younger than 16 years (Group 1), compared with 95.6% ± 2.7% in the group older than 16 years (Group 2), with a statistically significant difference of p < 0.0001. Sur-vival free from reoperation was 50.8% ± 16.9% in Group 1 and 47.0% ± 14.9% in Group 2 (p < 0.0001).
Conclusions: Late results obtained with mitral valve repair for rheumatic mitral valve insufficiency were satisfactory and exceeded those reported for mitral valve replacement in the same population.
