Determinants of Successful Endoscopic Internal Thoracic Artery Harvesting: A Prospective Analysis

  • Douglas West
  • Eric Lim
  • Richard Trimlett
  • Marcus Flather
  • John Yap
  • John Pepper
  • Anthony De Souza

Abstract

Objective: Endoscopic internal thoracic artery (ITA) harvesting is employed during minimal-access coronary artery bypass grafting. To improve case selection, we prospectively analyzed our entire experience to identify variables that predict intraoperative conversion to sternotomy.

Methods: We performed a prospective study from September 1999 to November 2003 of 100 consecutive patients with an endoscopically harvested left ITA (LITA). Success was defined as an endoscopic dissection of the LITA sufficient to reach the anastomosis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent preoperative and procedural predictors of success.

Results: The measured parameters (mean ± SD) were age (62 ± 9 years), height (174 ± 9 cm), weight (81 ± 14 kg), and logistic Euroscore (2.0 ± 1.7). Patients comprised 8 (8%) women, 17 (17%) with urgent operations, 42 (42%) with multiple vessel disease, 17 (17%) with a left ventricular ejection fraction <50%, 2 (2%) redo procedures, and 3 (3%) with pleural disease. The Zeus robot was used in 17 patients (17%). Eight-eight (88%) of the LITA were successfully harvested endoscopically. Among the 12 patients who underwent conversions, pleural adhesions were the most common finding (n = 4, 33%). One LITA was unusable. In the final multivariate model, lung disease was a negative predictor of successful endoscopic harvest (odds ratio, 0.13; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-0.63; P = .012). The variables of age, sex, left ventricular function, logistic Euroscore, operative priority, and use of the Zeus robot did not achieve statistical significance.

Conclusions: Acceptable conversion rates and low conduit wastage are achievable during a unit's initial experience. Lung disease is associated with increased conversion frequency, and surgeons embarking on endoscopic harvesting should consider excluding these patients to improve their chances of success. Pleural adhesions increase the technical difficulty of surgery.

References

Bucerius J, Metz S, Walther T, et al. 2002. Endoscopic internal thoracic artery dissection leads to significant reduction of pain after minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 73:1180-4.\nDuhaylongsod FG, Mayfield WR, Wolf RK. 1998. Endoscopic harvest of the internal thoracic artery: a multicenter experience in 218 cases. Ann Thorac Surg 66:1012-7.\nLichtenberg A, Hagl C, Harringer W, Klima U, Haverich A. 2000. Effects of minimal invasive coronary artery bypass on pulmonary function and postoperative pain. Ann Thorac Surg 70:461-5.\nLoulmet D, Carpentier A, d'Attellis N, et al. 1999. Endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting with the aid of robotic assisted instruments. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 118:4-10.\nNataf P, Al-Attar N, Ramadan R, et al. 2000. Thoracoscopic IMA takedown. J Card Surg 15:278-82.\nOhtsuka T, Wolf RK, Hiratzka LF, et al. 1997. Thoracoscopic internal mammary artery harvest for MICABG using the Harmonic Scalpel. Ann Thorac Surg 63(suppl):S107-9.\nVasilliades TA Jr. 2001. Atraumatic coronary artery bypass (ACAB): techniques and outcome. Heart Surg Forum 4:331-4.\nVassiliades TA Jr. 2002. Technical aids to performing thoracoscopic robotically-assisted internal mammary artery harvesting. Heart Surg Forum 5:119-24.\nWolf RK, Miyaji K, Flege JB Jr. 1999. Thoracoscopic mammary artery mobilization in redo minimally invasive coronary bypass operations. Ann Thorac Surg 68:1540-1.\nWolf RK, Ohtsuka T, Flege JB Jr. 1998. Early results of thoracoscopic internal mammary artery harvest using an ultrasonic scalpel. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 14:S54-7.\n
Published
2005-01-04
How to Cite
West, D., Lim, E., Trimlett, R., Flather, M., Yap, J., Pepper, J., & De Souza, A. (2005). Determinants of Successful Endoscopic Internal Thoracic Artery Harvesting: A Prospective Analysis. The Heart Surgery Forum, 7(2), E179-E182. https://doi.org/10.1532/HSF98.20041004
Section
Articles