A Method for Identifying Mechanisms of Neurologic Injury from Cardiac Surgery


  • Donald S. Likosky
  • Robert C. Groom
  • Cantwell Clark
  • Richard J. Forest
  • Robert S. Kramer
  • Jeremy R. Morton
  • Cathy S. Ross
  • Kathryn A. Sabadosa
  • Gerald T. O'Connor
  • for the Northern
  • for the Northern
  • for the Northern
  • Jeremy R. Morton
  • Cathy S. Ross




Background: A method for linking discrete surgical and perfusion-related processes of care with cerebral emboli, cerebral oxyhemoglobin desaturation, and hemodynamic changes may offer opportunities for reducing overall neurologic injury for patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Methods: An intensive intraoperative neurologic and physiologic monitoring approach was developed and implemented. Mechanisms likely to produce embolic (cerebral emboli), hypoperfusion (oxyhemoglobin desaturation), and hypotensive (hemodynamic changes) neurologic injuries were monitored and synchronized with the occurrence of surgical and perfusion clinical events/techniques using a case video.

Results: The system was tested among 32 cardiac surgery patients. Emboli were measured in the cerebral arteries and outflow of the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit among nearly 75% and 85% of patients, respectively. Oxyhemoglobin desaturation was measured among nearly 70% of patients. Hemodynamic information was recorded in 100% of patients.

Conclusions: We developed and successfully implemented a method for detailed real-time associations between processes of clinical care and precursors of neurologic injury. Knowledge of this linkage will result in the redesign of clinical care to reduce a patient's risk of neurologic injury.


Edmonds HL. 2000. Detection and treatment of cerebral hypoxia key to avoiding intraoperative brain injuries. J Clin Monit Comput 16(1):69-74.nGold JP, Charlson ME, Williams-Russo P, et al. 1995. Improvement of outcomes after coronary artery bypass. A randomized trial comparing intraoperative high versus low mean arterial pressure [see comments]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 110(5):1302-11; discussion 11-4.nGoto T, Baba T, Honma K, et al. 2001. Magnetic resonance imaging findings and postoperative neurologic dysfunction in elderly patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 72(1):137-42.nLikosky DS, Leavitt BJ, Marrin CA, et al. 2003. Intra- and postoperative predictors of stroke after coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 76(2):428-34.nLikosky DS, Marrin CA, Caplan LR, et al. 2003. Determination of etiologic mechanisms of strokes secondary to coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Stroke 34(12):2830-4.nMoehring MA, Spencer MP. 2002. Power M-mode Doppler (PMD) for observing cerebral blood flow and tracking emboli. Ultrasound Med Biol 28(1):49-57.nNewman MF, Kirchner JL, Phillips-Bute B, et al. 2001. Longitudinal assessment of neurocognitive function after coronary-artery bypass surgery. New Engl J Med 344(6):395-402.nPugsley W, Klinger L, Paschalis C, et al. 1994. The impact of microemboli during cardiopulmonary bypass on neuropsychological functioning. Stroke 25(7):1393-9.nSAS Institute Inc. 2001. SAS 8e Release 2. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc. Stata. 2003. Stata Statistical Software: Release 8.0. College Station, TX: Stata Corporation.n



How to Cite

Likosky, D. S., Groom, R. C., Clark, C., Forest, R. J., Kramer, R. S., Morton, J. R., Ross, C. S., Sabadosa, K. A., O’Connor, G. T., Northern, for the, Northern, for the, Northern, for the, Morton, J. R., & Ross, C. S. (2005). A Method for Identifying Mechanisms of Neurologic Injury from Cardiac Surgery. The Heart Surgery Forum, 7(6), 348-352. https://doi.org/10.1532/HSF98.20041088