Intraoperative and Histochemical Comparison of the Skeletonized and Pedicled Internal Thoracic Artery
AbstractConclusions. Although skeletonization of the ITA is a more technically demanding procedure, it provides some advantages such as increased available graft length and reduced sternal devascularization. This technique did not have any detrimental effects on the endothelial cell lining and e-NOS expressions on the endothelial layer. To reach a definitive judgment for using skeletonized ITA, we need information about the long-term angiographic patency rates.
Athanasiou T, Crossman MC, Asimakopoulos G, et al. 2004. Should the internal thoracic artery be skeletonized? Ann Thorac Surg 77: 2238-46.nBarner HB, Standeven JW, Reese J. 1985. Twelve-year experience with internal mammary artery for coronary artery bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 90: 668-75.nBical O, Braunberger E, Fischer M, et al. 1996. Bilateral skeletonized mammary artery grafting: experience with 560 consecutive patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 10: 971-6.nBroeders MAW, Doevendans PA, Maessen JG, et al. 2001. The human internal thoracic artery releases more nitric oxide in response to vascular endothelial growth factor than the human saphenous vein. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 122: 305-9.nCalafiore AM, Vitolla G, Iaco AL, et al. 1999. Bilateral internal mammary artery grafting: midterm results of pedicled versus skeletonized conduits. Ann Thorac Surg 67: 1637-42.nCohen AJ, Lockman J, Lorberboym M, et al. 1999. Assessment of sternal vascularity with single photon emission computed tomography after harvesting of the internal thoracic artery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 118: 496-502.nCunningham JM, Gharavi MA, Fardin R, Meek RA. 1992. Considerations in the skeletonization technique of internal thoracic artery dissection. Ann Thorac Surg 54: 947-51.nDel Campo C. 2003. Pedicled or skeletonized? A review of the internal thoracic artery graft. Tex Heart Inst J 30: 170-5.nDeja MA, Wos S, Golba KS, et al. 1999. Intraoperative and laboratory evaluation of skeletonized versus pedicled internal thoracic artery. Ann Thorac Surg 68: 2164-8.nGaudino M, Toesca A, Nori SL, Glieca F, Possati G. 1999. Effect of skeletonization of the internal thoracic artery on vessel wall integrity. Ann Thorac Surg 68: 1623-7.nGaudino M, Toesca A, Maggiano N, Pragliola C, Possati G. 2003. Localization of nitric oxide synthase type III in the internal thoracic and radial arteries and the great saphenous vein: a comparative immunohistochemical study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 125: 1510-5.nGoff SG, Wu HD, Sauvage LR, et al. 1988. Differences in reendothelialization after balloon catheter removal of endothelial cells, superficial endarterectomy and deep endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 7: 119-29.nHuddlestone CB, Stoney WS, Alford WC Jr, et al. 1986. Internal mammary artery grafts: technical factors influencing patency. Ann Thorac Surg 42: 543-9.nKeeley SB. 1987. The skeletonized internal mammary artery. Ann Thorac Surg 44: 324-5.nLoop FD, Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM, et al. 1986. Influence of the internal mammary artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events. N Eng J Med 314: 1-6.nMayer B, Hemmens B. 1997. Biosynthesis and action of nitric oxide in mammalian cells. Trends Biochem Sci 22: 477-81.nNoera G, Pensa P, Lodi R, Lamarra M, Biagi B, Guelfi P. 1993. Influence of different harvesting techniques on the arterial wall of the internal mammary artery graft: microscopic analysis.Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 41: 16-20.nPollock JS, Nakane M, Buttery LD, et al. 1993. Characterization and localization of endothelial nitric oxide synthase using specific monoclonal antibodies. Am J Physiol 265: C1379-87.nRaja SG, Dreyfus GD. 2005. Internal thoracic artery: to skeletonize or not to skeletonize? Ann Thorac Surg 79: 1805-11.nSasajima T, Wu MH, Shi Q, Hayashida N, Sauvage LR. 1998. Effect of skeletonizing dissection on the internal thoracic artery. Ann Thorac Surg 65: 1009-13.nSeyfer AE, Shriver CD, Miller TR, Graeber GM. 1988. Sternal blood flow after median sternotomy and mobilization of the internal mammary arteries. Surgery 104: 899-904.nTector AJ, McDonald ML, Kress DC, Downey FX, Schmahl TM. 2001. Purely internal thoracic artery grafts: outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg 72: 450-5.nUeda T, Taniguchi S, Kawata T, Mizuguchi K, Nakajima M, Yoshioka A. 2003. Does skeletonization compromise the integrity of internal thoracic artery grafts? Ann Thorac Surg 75: 1429-33.nWendler O, Tscholl D, Huang Q, Schaafers H. 1999. Free flow capacity of skeletonized versus pedicled internal thoracic artery grafts in coronary artery bypass grafts. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 15: 247-50.nYoshikai M, Ito T, Kamohara K, Yunoki J. 2004. Endothelial integrity of ultrasonically skeletonized internal thoracic artery: morphological analysis with scanning electron microscopy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 25: 208-11.n
How to Cite
Author Disclosure & Copyright Transfer Agreement
In order to publish the original work of another person(s), The Heart Surgery Forum® must receive an acknowledgment of the Author Agreement and Copyright Transfer Statement transferring to Forum Multimedia Publishing, L.L.C., a subsidiary of Carden Jennings Publishing Co., Ltd. the exclusive rights to print and distribute the author(s) work in all media forms. Failure to check Copyright Transfer agreement box below will delay publication of the manuscript.
A current form follows:
The author(s) hereby transfer(s), assign(s), or otherwise convey(s) all copyright ownership of the manuscript submitted to Forum Multimedia Publishing, LLC (Publisher). The copyright transfer covers the exclusive rights to reproduce and distribute the article and the material contained therein throughout the world in all languages and in all media of expression now known or later developed, including but not limited to reprints, photographic reproduction, microfilm, electronic data processing (including programming, storage, and transmission to other electronic data record(s), or any other reproductions of similar nature), and translations.
However, Publisher grants back to the author(s) the following:
- The right to make and distribute copies of all or part of this work for use of the author(s) in teaching;
- The right to use, after publication in The Heart Surgery Forum, all or part of the material from this work in a book by the author(s), or in a collection of work by the author(s);
- The royalty-free right to make copies of this work for internal distribution within the institution/company that employs the author(s) subject to the provisions below for a work-made-for-hire;
- The right to use figures and tables from this work, and up to 250 words of text, for any purpose;
- The right to make oral presentations of material from this work.
Publisher reserves the right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. To republish, such third parties must obtain written permission from the Publisher. (This is in accordance with the Copyright Statute, United States Code, Title 17. Exception: If all authors were bona fide officers or employees of the U.S. Government at the time the paper was prepared, the work is a “work of the US Government” (prepared by an officer or employee of the US Government as part of official duties), and therefore is not subject to US copyright; such exception should be indicated on signature lines. If this work was prepared under US Government contract or grant, the US Government may reproduce, royalty-free, all or portions of this work and may authorize others to do so, for official US Government purposes only, if the US Government contract or grant so requires.
I have participated in the conception and design of this work and in the writing of the manuscript and take public responsibility for it. Neither this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content under my authorship has been published, has been submitted for publication elsewhere, or will be submitted for publication elsewhere while under consideration by The Heart Surgery Forum, except as described in an attachment. I have reviewed this manuscript (original version) and approve its submission. If I am listed above as corresponding author, I will provide all authors with information regarding this manuscript and will obtain their approval before submitting any revision. I attest to the validity, accuracy, and legitimacy of the content of the manuscript and understand that Publisher assumes no responsibility for the validity, accuracy, and legitimacy of its content. I warrant that this manuscript is original with me and that I have full power to make this Agreement. I warrant that it contains no matter that is libelous or otherwise unlawful or that invades individual privacy or infringes any copyright or other proprietary right. I agree to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless of and from any claim made against Publisher that relates to or arises out of the publication of the manuscript and agree that this indemnification shall include payment of all costs and expenses relating to the defense of any such claim, including all reasonable attorney’s fees.
I warrant that I have no financial interest in the drugs, devices, or procedures described in the manuscript (except as disclosed in the attached statement).
I state that the institutional Human Subjects Committee and/or the Ethics Committee approved the clinical protocol reported in this manuscript for the use of experimental techniques, drugs, or devices in human subjects and appropriate informed consent documents were utilized.
Furthermore, I state that any and all animals used for experimental purposes received humane care in USDA registered facilities in compliance with the “Principles of Laboratory Animal Care” formulated by the National Society for Medical Research and the “Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals” prepared by the Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources and published by the National Institutes of Health (NIH Publication No. 85-23, revised 1985).