Left Internal Mammary Artery Improves 5-Year Survival in Patients Under 40 Subjected to Surgical Revascularization


  • Marcin Malinowski
  • Roman Mrozek
  • Romuald Twardowski
  • Jolanta Biernat
  • Marek A. Deja
  • Kazimierz Widenka
  • Anna-Maria Dalecka
  • Iwona Kobielusz-Gembala
  • Piotr Janusiewicz
  • Stanislaw Wos
  • Krzysztof S. Golba




Background: The population of young patients under 40 requiring coronary bypass surgery is characterized by an extremely and unusually rapid progression of coronary heart disease. The aim of the present study was to assess the clinical status and quality of life in these patients after surgery in relation to the type of conduit used to revascularize the left anterior descending artery (LAD).

Methods: One hundred seventeen patients under 40 (range, 30-40 years) underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) at our institution between 1991 and 1999. Ninety-one patients received LIMA to LAD graft (group A), and in 26 patients the saphenous vein was used to graft this vessel (group B). Seventy-eight patients (63 in group A and 15 in group B) were assessed after a mean time of 71 ± 26 months. They were asked to fill out a questionnaire aimed at their subjective assessment of their quality of life as compared with their preoperative status.

Results: Five-year actuarial survival was higher in patients with LIMA to LAD graft (log rank test: P < .004). The functional status of patients in group B was significantly worse in comparison to group A: respectively, CCS 2.2 ± 1.1 versus 1.5 ± 0.7; (P = .02), NYHA 2.2 ± 1.1 versus 1.3 ± 0.5; (P = .002). Patients in group B more frequently required reinstitution of nitroglycerine treatment (93% versus 56%; P = .025). We failed to show differences between the 2 groups as far as subjective quality of life is concerned. In summary, 63% of patients perceived it to be worse, 29% to be better, and 8% felt it had not changed.

Conclusion: The use of LIMA is crucial in patients undergoing CABG under the age of 40 in order to achieve the best possible surgical results. Quicker recurrence of coronary disease symptoms is observed when a vein is used to graft the LAD. It may reflect an earlier progress of atherosclerosis in venous grafts.


Cameron A, Davis KB, Green G, Schaff HV. 1996. Coronary bypass surgery with internal-thoracic-artery grafts--effects on survival over a 15-year period. N Engl J Med 334(4):216-9.nOtto CM. 2002. The Practice of clinical echocardiography. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders. Rohrer-Gubler I, Niederhauser U, Turina MI. 1998. Late outcome of coronary artery bypass grafting in young versus older patients. Ann Tho-rac Surg 65(2):377-82.nSimchen E, Galai N, Braun D, et al. 2001. Sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with low quality of life one year after coronary bypass operations: The Israeli Coronary Artery Bypass Study (ISCAB). J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 121(5):909-19.nFrench JK, Scott DS, Whitlock RM, et al. 1995. Late outcome after coronary artery bypass graft surgery in patients < 40 years old. Circulation 92(9 Suppl):II14-9.nGraziosi GC, Wolterbeek DW, Kappetein AP, Huysmans HA. 1994. Risk factors in coronary artery bypass surgery for patients 40 years of age and younger. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 42(5):259-63.nHelmcke F, Nanda NC, Hsiung MC, et al. 1987. Color Doppler assessment of mitral regurgitation with orthogonal planes. Circulation 75(1):175-83.nKelly ME, DeLaria GA, Najafi H. 1988. Coronary artery bypass surgery in patients less than 40 years of age. Chest 94(6):1138-41.nLaks H, Kaiser GC, Barner HB, Codd JE, Willman VI. 1978. Coronary revascularization under age 40 years. Risk factors and results of surgery. Am J Cardiol 41(3):584-9.nLoop FD, Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM, et al. 1986. Influence of the internal-mammary-artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events. N Engl J Med 314(1):1-6.nMyers WO, Blackstone EH, Davis K, Foster ED, Kaiser GC. 1999. CASS Registry long term surgical survival. Coronary Artery Surgery Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 33(2):488-98.nNataf P, Parikh S, Rabago G, et al. 1992. Results of coronary artery surgery in young adults. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 33(3):281-4.nNg WK, Vedder M, Whitlock RM, et al. 1997. Coronary revascularisa-tion in young adults. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 11(4):732-8.nLoop FD, Irarrazaval MJ, Bredee JJ, Siegel W, Taylor PC, Sheldon WC. 1977. Internal mammary artery graft for ischemic heart disease. Effect of revascularization on clinical status and survival. Am J Cardiol 39(4): 516-22.nOlearchyk AS, Magovern GJ. Internal mammary artery grafting. Clinical results, patency rates, and long-term survival in 833 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 92(6):1082-7.nTrzeciak P, Zembala M, Polonski L. 2001. Young adults undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting have multiple cardiovascular risk factors. Kardiol Pol 54:93-8.nZembala M, Trzeciak P. 2002. Operacje u mlodych z zaawansowana miazdzyca (in Polish). In Zembala M, Bochenek A and Wos S, eds. "Chirurgia naczyn wiencowych" PZWL.nZehr KJ, Lee PC, Poston RS, Gillinov AM, Greene PS, Cameron DE. 1994. Two decades of coronary artery bypass graft surgery in young adults. Circulation 90(5 Pt 2):II133-9.n



How to Cite

Malinowski, M., Mrozek, R., Twardowski, R., Biernat, J., Deja, M. A., Widenka, K., Dalecka, A.-M., Kobielusz-Gembala, I., Janusiewicz, P., Wos, S., & Golba, K. S. (2005). Left Internal Mammary Artery Improves 5-Year Survival in Patients Under 40 Subjected to Surgical Revascularization. The Heart Surgery Forum, 9(1), E493-E498. https://doi.org/10.1532/HSF98.20041182