Continuous Arterial Pressure Waveform Analysis Accurately Detects Cardiac Output in Cardiac Surgery: A Prospective Comparison with Thermodilution, Echocardiography, and Magnetic Resonance Techniques
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of cardiac output (CO) measurements of noninvasive continuous arterial pressure waveform analysis, thermodilution technique and echocardiography with magnetic resonance (MRI) imaging.
Methods: Eleven patients who underwent coronary bypass surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass were prospectively enrolled in this study in 2008. Repeated arterial pressure based, thermodilution, echocardiography, and MRI cardiac output measurements were performed at the postoperative 24th hour.
Results: Mean CO values were 5.58 ± 0.98, 5.97 ± 0.8, 5.31 ± 0.52, and 5.32 ± 0.92 measured with MRI, echocardiography, arterial pressure waveform analysis, and thermodilution techniques, respectively. Bland-Altman analysis showed good overall agreement between the MRI vs arterial waveform analysis and MRI vs thermodilution; values for bias ± SD were -0.27 ± 1.06 (95% confidence interval [CI] [-2.3 to 1.8]; P = .42) and -0.26 ± 0.89 (95% CI [-2.0 to 1.5]; P = .34), respectively. Poor agreement was defined between MRI and echocardiography: bias ± SD, 0.39 ± 1.28 (95% CI [-2.1 to 2.9]; P = .34).
Conclusions: Arterial pressure-based and thermodilution CO measurement systems yielded results comparable to those obtained with cardiac MRI assessment after cardiac surgery. Arterial pressure wave-form analysis systems for CO measurement may be feasible, noninvasive methods for use in cardiac surgery.
Bein B, Worthmann F, Tonner PH, et al. 2004. Comparison of esophageal Doppler, pulse contour analysis, and real-time pulmonary artery thermodilution for the continuous measurement of cardiac output. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 18:185-9.nBettex DA, Hinselmann V, Hellermann JP, et al. 2004. Transesophageal echocardiography is unreliable for cardiac output assessment after cardiac surgery compared with thermodilution. Anaesthesia 59:1184-92.nBottini PB, Carr AA, Prisant M, et al. 1995. Magnetic resonance imaging compared to echocardiography to assess left ventricular mass in the hypertensive patient. Am J Hypertens 8:221-8.nBreukers RM, Sepehrkhouy S, Spiegelenberg SR, et al. 2007. Cardiac output measured by a new arterial pressure waveform analysis method without calibration compared with thermodilution after cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 21:632-5.nButton D, Weibel L, Reuthebuch O, et al. 2007. Clinical evaluation of the FloTrac/Vigileo system and two established continuous cardiac output monitoring devices in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 99:329-36.nCastillo E, Lima JA, Bluemke DA. 2003. Regional myocardial function: advances in MR imaging and analysis. Radiographics 23 Spec No:S127-40. Available from: http://radiographics.rsnajnls.org/cgi/reprint/23/suppl_1/S127.pdf'>http://radiographics.rsnajnls.org/cgi/reprint/23/suppl_1/S127.pdfnCompton FD, Zukunft B, Hoffmann C, Zidek W, Schaefer JH. 2008. Performance of a minimally invasive uncalibrated cardiac output monitoring system (FlotracTM/VigileoTM) in hemodynamically unstable patients. Br J Anaesth 100:451-6.nGiomarelli P, Biagioli B, Scolletta S. 2004. Cardiac output monitoring by pressure recording analytical method in cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 26:515-20.nIshihara H, Okawa H, Tanabe B, et al. 2004. A new noninvasive continuous cardiac output trend solely utilizing routine cardiovascular monitors. J Clin Monit Comput 18:313-20.nLorsomradee S, Lorsomradee S, Cromheecke S, et al. 2007. Uncalibrated arterial pulse contour analysis versus continuous thermodilution technique: effects of alterations in arterial waveform. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 21:636-43.nLorsomradee S, Lorsomradee SR, Cromheecke S, et al. 2007. Continuous cardiac output measurement: arterial pressure analysis versus thermodilution technique during cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Anaesthesia 62:979-83.nMayer J, Boldt J, Wolf MW, et al. 2008. Cardiac output derived from arterial pressure waveform analysis in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: validity of a second generation device. Anesth Analg 106:867-72.nMorris AH, Chapman RH, Gardner RM. 1984. Frequency of technical problems encountered in the measurement of pulmonary artery wedge pressure. Crit Care Med 12:164-70.nPattynama PMT, Lamb HJ, Van der Velde EA, et al. 1993. Left ventricular measurements with cine and spin-echo imaging: a study of reproducibility with variance component analysis. Radiology 187:261-8.nPluim BP, Beyerbacht HP, Chin JC, et al. 1997. Comparison of echocardiography with magnetic resonance in the assessment of the athlete's heart. Eur Heart J 18:1505-13.nRoyse CF, Royse AG, Blake DW, et al. 1999. Measurement of cardiac output by transoesophageal echocardiography: a comparison of two Doppler methods with thermodilution. Anaesth Intensive Care 27:586-90.nYamamuro M, Tadamura E, Kubo S, et al. 2005. Cardiac functional analysis with multi-detector row CT and segmental reconstruction algorithm: comparison with echocardiography, SPECT, and MR imaging. Radiology 234:381-90.n
How to Cite
Author Disclosure & Copyright Transfer Agreement
In order to publish the original work of another person(s), The Heart Surgery Forum® must receive an acknowledgment of the Author Agreement and Copyright Transfer Statement transferring to Forum Multimedia Publishing, L.L.C., a subsidiary of Carden Jennings Publishing Co., Ltd. the exclusive rights to print and distribute the author(s) work in all media forms. Failure to check Copyright Transfer agreement box below will delay publication of the manuscript.
A current form follows:
The author(s) hereby transfer(s), assign(s), or otherwise convey(s) all copyright ownership of the manuscript submitted to Forum Multimedia Publishing, LLC (Publisher). The copyright transfer covers the exclusive rights to reproduce and distribute the article and the material contained therein throughout the world in all languages and in all media of expression now known or later developed, including but not limited to reprints, photographic reproduction, microfilm, electronic data processing (including programming, storage, and transmission to other electronic data record(s), or any other reproductions of similar nature), and translations.
However, Publisher grants back to the author(s) the following:
- The right to make and distribute copies of all or part of this work for use of the author(s) in teaching;
- The right to use, after publication in The Heart Surgery Forum, all or part of the material from this work in a book by the author(s), or in a collection of work by the author(s);
- The royalty-free right to make copies of this work for internal distribution within the institution/company that employs the author(s) subject to the provisions below for a work-made-for-hire;
- The right to use figures and tables from this work, and up to 250 words of text, for any purpose;
- The right to make oral presentations of material from this work.
Publisher reserves the right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. To republish, such third parties must obtain written permission from the Publisher. (This is in accordance with the Copyright Statute, United States Code, Title 17. Exception: If all authors were bona fide officers or employees of the U.S. Government at the time the paper was prepared, the work is a “work of the US Government” (prepared by an officer or employee of the US Government as part of official duties), and therefore is not subject to US copyright; such exception should be indicated on signature lines. If this work was prepared under US Government contract or grant, the US Government may reproduce, royalty-free, all or portions of this work and may authorize others to do so, for official US Government purposes only, if the US Government contract or grant so requires.
I have participated in the conception and design of this work and in the writing of the manuscript and take public responsibility for it. Neither this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content under my authorship has been published, has been submitted for publication elsewhere, or will be submitted for publication elsewhere while under consideration by The Heart Surgery Forum, except as described in an attachment. I have reviewed this manuscript (original version) and approve its submission. If I am listed above as corresponding author, I will provide all authors with information regarding this manuscript and will obtain their approval before submitting any revision. I attest to the validity, accuracy, and legitimacy of the content of the manuscript and understand that Publisher assumes no responsibility for the validity, accuracy, and legitimacy of its content. I warrant that this manuscript is original with me and that I have full power to make this Agreement. I warrant that it contains no matter that is libelous or otherwise unlawful or that invades individual privacy or infringes any copyright or other proprietary right. I agree to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless of and from any claim made against Publisher that relates to or arises out of the publication of the manuscript and agree that this indemnification shall include payment of all costs and expenses relating to the defense of any such claim, including all reasonable attorney’s fees.
I warrant that I have no financial interest in the drugs, devices, or procedures described in the manuscript (except as disclosed in the attached statement).
I state that the institutional Human Subjects Committee and/or the Ethics Committee approved the clinical protocol reported in this manuscript for the use of experimental techniques, drugs, or devices in human subjects and appropriate informed consent documents were utilized.
Furthermore, I state that any and all animals used for experimental purposes received humane care in USDA registered facilities in compliance with the “Principles of Laboratory Animal Care” formulated by the National Society for Medical Research and the “Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals” prepared by the Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources and published by the National Institutes of Health (NIH Publication No. 85-23, revised 1985).