Reconstruction of Chronic Aseptic Sternal Pseudoarthrosis after Median Sternotomy: Initial Experience with the Ley Prosthesis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1532/HSF98.20071116Abstract
It has previously been reported that the Ley prosthesis, a 0.5-mm-thick titanium alloy plate designed for reconstruction and stabilization of the unstable sternotomy, leads to shorter hospital stay and reduces the need for further surgical procedures in patients with postoperative mediastinitis after open heart surgery. We report our initial experience with the Ley prosthesis in patients with chronic aseptic sternotomy dehiscence. The study included 6 male patients (age 42-80 years) with opiate-derivate-dependent intractable pain and significantly reduced quality of life caused by noninfected sternal pseudoarthrosis and unstable sternotomy with large sternal bone tissue deficit. Four of the patients had undergone various surgical fixation procedures 8 days to 12 months after the primary operation. The patients were treated with reconstruction and stabilization of the sternum with the Ley prosthesis 10 to 40 months after the primary operation. In 1 patient bone transplantation was used. No immediate peri- or postoperative complications were observed, and all patients were discharged 4 to 11 days after surgery. One patient who received a bone transplant developed wound infection, and the prosthesis was removed 5 weeks after implantation. At 6-month follow-up all sternotomies were found stable, and patients reported that pain had decreased and quality of life was significantly improved. Our results demonstrate that the Ley prosthesis can be safely and efficiently used for the reconstruction and stabilization of the sternum in patients with intractable pain caused by noninfected postoperative sternal dehiscence and large sternal bone tissue deficit.References
Astudillo R, Vaage J, Myhre U, Karevold A, Gardlund B. 2001. Fewer reoperations and shorter stay in the cardiac surgical ward when stabilising the sternum with the Ley prosthesis in postoperative mediastinitis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 20(1):133-9.nBertin KC, Rice RS, Doty DB, Jones KW. 2002. Repair of transverse sternal nonunions using metal plates and autogenous bone graft. Ann Thorac Surg 73(5):1661-2.nBitkover C, Gardlund B. 1998. Mediastinitis after cardiovascular operations: a case-control study of risk factors. 65:36-40.nCasha AR, Gauci M, Yang L, Saleh M, Kay PH, Cooper GJ. 2001. Fatigue testing median sternotomy closures. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 19(3):249-53.nCohen DJ, Griffin LV. 2002. A biomechanical comparison of three sternotomy closure techniques. Ann Thorac Surg 73(2):563-8.nDalton ML, Connally SR. Median sternotomy. 1993. Surg Gynecol Obstet 176(6):615-24.nKouchoukos NT, Wareing TH, Murphy SF, Pelate C, Marshall WG Jr. 1990. Risk of bilateral internal mammary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 49(2):210-7.nMcGregor WE, Trumble DR, Magovern JA. 1999. Mechanical analysis of midline sternotomy wound closure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 117(6):1144-50.nMears DC, Velyvis J. Surgical reconstruction of late pelvic post-traumatic nonunion and malalignment. 2003. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85(1):21-30.nPai S, Gunja NJ, Dupak EL, et al. 2005. In vitro comparison of wire and plate fixation for midline sternotomies. Ann Thorac Surg 80(3):962-8.nRobicsek F, Daugherty HK, Cook JW. 1977. The prevention and treatment of sternum separation following open-heart surgery. J Thorac Surg 73:267-8.nSzerafin T, Osama J, Gyory F, Petterfy A. 2001. Surgical treatment of sternal dehiscence after sternotomy using Ley prosthesis. Magy Seb 54(6):375-8.nTarelli G, Maugeri R, Pedretti R, Grossi C, Ornaghi D, Sala A. 1998. The use of bilateral mammary artery in myocardial revascularization: the risk factors emergent from a multivariate analysis conducted on 474 patients. G Ital Cardiol 28(11):1230-7.n
