Detecting Volume Responders prior to Implantation of a Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Device via Minithoracotomy: The Septal Flash as a Predictor of Immediate Left Ventricular Reverse Remodeling

Authors

  • Maja ?ikeš
  • Bart Bijnens
  • Željko ?uri?
  • Martina Lovri? Ben?i?
  • Igor Gošev
  • Vedran Velagi?
  • Hrvoje Gašparovi?
  • Davor Mili?i?
  • Bojan Bio?ina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1532/HSF98.20091129

Abstract

Background: Although cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is well established as an adjunctive heart failure treatment, a 30% rate of nonresponders poses a challenge to improve the detection of potential responders prior to device implantation. A previously proposed mechanism-based approach to patient selection suggests in part that the septal flash is a sign of intraventricular dyssynchrony, which is predictive of CRT responsiveness.

Methods: In this pilot study, data from 5 consecutive patients (2 women and 3 men; mean ± SD age, 62 ± 9 years) referred for CRT device implantation via a minithoracotomy were analyzed. Intraoperative transthoracic and/or transesophageal echocardiography data, as well as Doppler myocardial imaging data, were acquired before and after CRT device activation. The septal flash was defined as an early ventricular inward and outward septal motion within the isovolumic contraction period and was imaged with grayscale imaging or tissue Doppler color M-mode. Reverse remodeling was defined as a reduction in the left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) of ?10%. The right atrial and right ventricular leads were placed transvenously, and the LV screw-in lead was positioned epicardially on the lateral wall.

Results: The septal flash was detected preoperatively in all patients and resolved immediately after the onset of biventricular pacing. Immediately following pacemaker activation, we measured a significant reduction in the LVESV (248 ± 99 mL versus 190 ± 100 mL, P = .01) and an increase in the ejection fraction (19% ± 5% versus 28% ± 5%, P = .01) in all patients. Likewise, a significant increase in the postactivation dP/dt (rate of LV pressure change) measured noninvasively from the mitral regurgitation trace was noted in all patients (298.6 ± 58.0 mm Hg/s versus 601.7 ± 111.2 mm Hg/s, P = .001).

Conclusion: The preoperative presence of the septal flash is a valid predictor of the response to CRT. Immediately after CRT device activation, the septal flash disappears, and LV reverse remodeling and an increase in contractility are observed.

References

Abraham WT, Leon AR, Young JB. 2003. Benefits of cardiac resynchronization therapy sustained for 18 months: results from the MIRACLE program [abstract]. Circulation 108(suppl IV):IV-629. Abstract 2859.nBargiggia GS, Bertucci C, Recusani F, et al. 1989. A new method for estimating left ventricular dP/dt by continuous wave Doppler echocardiography: validation studies at cardiac catheterization. Circulation 80:1287-92.nBijnens BH, Cikes M, Claus P, Sutherland GR. 2009. Velocity and deformation for the assessment of myocardial dysfunction. Eur J Echocardiogr 10:216-26.nChung ES, Leon AR, Tavazzi L, et al. 2008. Results of the Predictors of Response to CRT (PROSPECT) trial. Circulation 117:2608-16.nChung N, Nishimura RA, Holmes DR Jr, Tajik AJ. 1992. Measurement of left ventricular dP/dt by simultaneous Doppler echocardiography and cardiac catheterization. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 5:147-52.nCleland JGF, Daubert J-C, Erdmann E, et al,. for the Cardiac Resynchronization-Heart Failure (CARE-HF) Study Investigators. 2005. The effect of cardiac resynchronization on morbidity and mortality in heart failure. N Engl J Med 352:1539-49.nDevereux RB, Alonso DR, Lutas EM, et al. 1986. Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy: comparison to necropsy findings. Am J Cardiol 57:450-8.nGhio S, Freemantle N, Scelsi L, et al. 2009. Long-term left ventricular reverse remodelling with cardiac resynchronization therapy: results from the CARE-HF trial. Eur J Heart Fail 11:480-8.nHunt SA, Abraham WT, Chin MH, et al,. American College of Cardiology; American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, American College of Chest Physicians, International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation, Heart Rhythm Society. 2005. ACC/AHA 2005 guideline update for the diagnosis and management of chronic heart failure in the adult: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of Heart Failure): developed in collaboration with the American College of Chest Physicians and the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation 112:e154-235.nLinde C, Leclercq C, Rex S, et al. 2002. Long-term benefits of biventricular pacing in congestive heart failure: results from the MUltisite STimulation in cardiomyopathy (MUSTIC) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 40:111-8.nMolhoek SG, Bax JJ, van Erven L, et al. 2004. Comparison of benefits from cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy versus idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 93:860-3.nParsai C, Baltabaeva A, Anderson L, Chaparro M, Bijnens B, Sutherland GR. 2009. Low-dose dobutamine stress echo to quantify the degree of remodelling after cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur Heart J 30:950-8.nParsai C, Bijnens B, Sutherland GR, et al. 2009. Toward understanding response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: left ventricular dyssynchrony is only one of multiple mechanisms. Eur Heart J 30:940-9.nSchiller NB, Shah PM, Crawford M, et al. 1989. Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Standards, Subcommittee on Quantitation of Two-Dimensional Echocardiograms. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2:358-67.nSutton MS, Keane MG. 2007. Reverse remodelling in heart failure with cardiac resynchronisation therapy. Heart 93:167-71.nWeidemann F, Kowalski M, D'hooge J, Bijnens B, Sutherland GR. 2001. Doppler myocardial imaging. A new tool to assess regional inhomogeneity in cardiac function. Basic Res Cardiol 96:595-605.nYu CM, Bleeker GB, Fung JW, et al. 2005. Left ventricular reverse remodeling but not clinical improvement predicts long-term survival after cardiac resynchronization therapy. Circulation 112:1580-6.nYu CM, Chau E, Sanderson JE, et al. 2002. Tissue Doppler echocardiographic evidence of reverse remodeling and improved synchronicity by simultaneously delaying regional contraction after biventricular pacing therapy in heart failure. Circulation 105:438-45.n

Published

2009-12-24

How to Cite

?ikeš, M., Bijnens, B., ?uri?, Željko, Ben?i?, M. L., Gošev, I., Velagi?, V., Gašparovi?, H., Mili?i?, D., & Bio?ina, B. (2009). Detecting Volume Responders prior to Implantation of a Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Device via Minithoracotomy: The Septal Flash as a Predictor of Immediate Left Ventricular Reverse Remodeling. The Heart Surgery Forum, 12(6), E362-E367. https://doi.org/10.1532/HSF98.20091129

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)