Ongoing Procedure Development in Robotically Assisted Totally Endoscopic Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (TECAB)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1532/HSF98.20051126Abstract
Background: Totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting (TECAB) using robotics requires stepwise introduction into a heart surgery program. It is the aim of this study to evaluate the state of procedure development after continued application of telemanipulation techniques in the clinical setting. We also sought to assess perioperative and intermediate term clinical results after robotically assisted CABG.
Patients and methods: From June 2001 to March 2005, robotically assisted CABG using the daVinciTM system was carried out in 107 patients with single and multi-vessel coronary artery disease. The following procedures were performed: robotically assisted endoscopic left internal mammary artery (LIMA) harvesting and completion of the procedure as conventional CABG, MIDCAB, or OPCAB (n = 22), robotically assisted suturing of LIMA-to-LAD anastomoses during conventional CABG (n = 28), TECAB on the arrested heart using remote access perfusion (n = 48), TECAB on the beating heart using an endostabilizer (n = 8), takedown of adhesions (TECAB intended) (n = 1).
Results: Hospital mortality was 0% and cumulative risk adjusted mortality reached 1.6 lives saved versus EuroSCORE predictions. Undesirable surgical events (USE) such as conversion, on table revision, or postoperative revision procedures occurred in 34 out of 107 (32%) patients. Median ventilation time and ICU stay, however, were 11(0-278) hours and 21(11-389) hours, respectively. Cumulative 3 years survival was 100% and freedom from angina at 3 years was 97%.
Conclusions: We conclude that despite being surgically challenging robotically assisted coronary artery surgery can be implemented with acceptable safety. TECAB procedures have reached a reproducible state. Perioperative mortality after robotically assisted CABG may be lower than predicted. Intermediate term clinical results are very satisfactory.
References
Falk V, Diegeler A, Walther T, et al. 2000. Total endoscopic computer enhanced coronary bypass grafting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 17:38-45.nRobotically Enhanced Cardiac Surgery. Eur Surg 34:183-9.nSchachner T, Bonaros N, Laufer G, Bonatti J. 2004. The ESTECH remote access perfusion cannula in minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Heart Surg Forum 7:E632-5.nOtt H, Bonatti J, Müller L, Chevtchik O, Riha M, Laufer G. 2002.nMohr FW, Falk V, Diegeler A, et al. 2001. Computer-enhanced "robotic" cardiac surgery: experience in 148 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 121:842-53.nBolton R, Connally J. 2004. Results of a phase one study on robotically assisted myocardial revascularization on the beating heart. Ann Thorac< Surg 78:158-58.nKappert U, Schneider J, Cichon R, et al. 2001. Development of robotic enhanced endoscopic surgery for the treatment of coronary artery disease. Circulation 104:I-102-I-107.nBonatti J, Schachner T, Bernecker O, et al. 2004. Robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass: Program development and learning curve issues. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 127:504-10.nDogan S, Aybek T, Andressen E, et al. 2002. Totally endoscopic coronary bypass grafting on cardiopulmonary bypass with robotically enhanced telemanipulation: report of forty-five cases. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 123:1125-31.nLegrand V, Serruys P, Unger F, et al. 2004. Three-years outcome after coronary stenting versus bypass surgery for the treatment of multivessel disease. Circulation 109:1114-20.nLoulmet D, Carpentier A, D´Attellis N, et al. 1999. Endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting with the aid of robotic assisted instruments. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 118:4-10.nSergeant P, de Worm E, Meyns B, Wouters P. 2001. The challenge of departmental quality control in reengineering towards off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur J Cardio-thorac Surg 20:538-43.n
