Topical Vasodilators for Preventing Radial Artery Spasm during Harvesting for Coronary Revascularization: Comparison of 4 Agents
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1532/HSF98.20061070Abstract
Background. There is still controversy about which vasodilator solution is best for storing radial artery (RA) conduits prior to coronary artery bypass grafting. The aim of this pilot study was to investigate how 4 different topical vasodilators applied during RA harvesting affect blood flow with the vessel in situ.
Materials and Methods. The subjects were 85 patients who underwent RA harvesting in preparation for coronary artery bypass grafting. Each case was assigned to 1 of 5 groups (17 RAs each) that were treated with different solutions: normal saline (control), nitroglycerin, diltiazem, papaverine, and adenosine. Standard clinical concentrations were used. The RA was partially harvested (pedicle attached proximally) and flow rates and hemodynamic parameters (mean arterial pressure, heart rate, central venous pressure) were recorded at 2 time points: (1) pretreatment and (2) after 5 minutes of immersion in 60 mL of treatment solution. Results were compared within and between groups, and post-treatment-to-pretreatment ratios were calculated for each variable.
Results. There were no significant differences among the groups' mean pretreatment flow rates (P = .979) or mean posttreatment flow rates (P = .069). All except the diltiazem group showed a significant rise in mean flow rate from pretreatment to posttreatment. The mean posttreatment-to-pretreatment ratios for RA flow rate were 1.28 ± 0.39 in the saline group, 1.85 ± 0.72 in the nitroglycerin group, 1.31 ± 0.48 in the diltiazem group, 1.37 ± 0.64 in the papaverine group, and 1.23 ± 0.42 in the adenosine group. Only the mean flow ratio in the nitroglycerin group was significantly higher than that in the saline group (P = .003). The mean flow ratios in the other vasodilator groups were not statistically different from the flow ratio in the saline group.
Conclusions. These preliminary results indicate that topical application of nitroglycerin solution effectively prevents perioperative spasm of the RA in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. The authors recommend this solution for preparation and storage of RA grafts. Randomized controlled trials with power analysis will give more definitive information.
References
Acar C, Jebara VA, Portoghese M, et al. 1992. Revival of the radial artery for coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 54:652-60.nAffleck DG, Barner HB, Bailey MS, et al. 2004. Flow dynamics of the internal thoracic and radial artery T-graft. Ann Thorac Surg 78:1290-4.nBarner HB. 1999. The continuing evolution of arterial conduits. Ann Thorac Surg 68:S1-8.nBond BR, Zellner JL, Dorman BH, et al. 2000. Differential effects of calcium channel antagonists in the amelioration of radial artery vasospasm. Ann Thorac Surg 69:1035-41.nCable DG, Caccitolo JA, Pearson PJ, et al. 1998. New approaches to prevention and treatment of radial artery graft vasospasm. Circulation 98:II15-22.nCable DG, Caccitolo JA, Pfeifer EA, et al. 1999. Endothelial regulation of vascular contraction in radial and internal mammary arteries. Ann Thorac Surg 67:1083-90.nCarpentier A, Guermonprez JL, Deloche A, Frechette C, DuBost C. 1973. The aorta-to-coronary radial artery bypass graft. A technique avoiding pathological changes in grafts. Ann Thorac Surg 16:111-21.nChanda J, Brichkov I, Canver CC. 2000. Prevention of radial artery graft vasospasm after coronary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 70:2070-4.nChanda J, Canver CC. 2001. Reversal of preexisting vasospasm in coronary artery conduits. Ann Thorac Surg 72:476-80.nChong WC, Ong PJ, Hayward C, Moat N, Collins P. 2001. Effects of storage solutions on in vitro vasoreactivity of radial artery conduits. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 122:470-5.nConant AR, Shackcloth MJ, Oo AY, Chester MR, Simpson AW, Dihmis WC. 2003. Phenoxybenzamine treatment is insufficient to prevent spasm in the radial artery: the effect of other vasodilators. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 126:448-54.nFisk RL, Brooks CH, Callaghan JC, Dvorkin J. 1976. Experience with the radial artery graft for coronary artery bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 21:513-8.nGabe ED, Figal JC, Wisner JN, Laguens R. 2001. Radial artery graft vasospasm. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 19:102-4.nHe GW. 1998. Verapamil plus nitroglycerin solution maximally preserves endothelial function of the radial artery: comparison with papaverine solution. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 115:1321-7.nHe GW, Yang CQ. 1996. Use of verapamil and nitroglycerin solution in preparation of radial artery for coronary grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 61:610-4.nHe GW, Yang CQ. 1999. Comparison of the vasorelaxant effect of nitro-prusside and nitroglycerin in the human radial artery in vitro. Br J Clin Pharmacol 48:99-104.nLocker C, Mohr R, Paz Y, et al. 2002. Pretreatment with alpha-adrenergic blockers for prevention of radial artery spasm. Ann Thorac Surg 74:S1368-70.nLuscher TF, Diederich D, Siebenmann R, et al. 1988. Difference between endothelium-dependent relaxation in arterial and in venous coronary bypass grafts. N Engl J Med 319:462-7.nMedina P, Segarra G, Martinez-Leon JB, et al. 2000. Relaxation induced by cGMP phosphodiesterase inhibitors sildenafil and zaprinast in human vessels. Ann Thorac Surg 70:1327-31.nShapira OM, Xu A, Vita JA, et al. 1999. Nitroglycerin is superior to diltiazem as a coronary bypass conduit vasodilator. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 117:906-11.nShapira OM, Alkon JD, Macron DS, et al. 2000. Nitroglycerin is preferable to diltiazem for prevention of coronary bypass conduit spasm. Ann Thorac Surg 70:883-9.nTanaka KA, Szlam F, Katori N, Tsuda A, Levy JH. 2004. In vitro effects of antihypertensive drugs on thromboxane agonist (U46619)-induced vaso-constriction in human internal mammary artery. Br J Anaesth 93:257-62.nTatoulis J, Jiang GC, Moffatt JD, Cocks TM. 1999. Storage of radial artery grafts in blood increases vessel reactivity to vasoconstrictors in vitro. Ann Thorac Surg 68:2191-5.nVelez DA, Morris CD, Muraki S, et al. 2001. Brief pretreatment of radial artery conduits with phenoxybenzamine prevents vasoconstriction long term. Ann Thorac Surg 72:1977-84.nZabeeda D, Medalion B, Jackobshvilli S, Ezra S, Schachner A, Cohen AJ. 2001. Comparison of systemic vasodilators: effects on flow in internal mammary and radial arteries. Ann Thorac Surg 71:138-41.n
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Author Disclosure & Copyright Transfer Agreement
In order to publish the original work of another person(s), The Heart Surgery Forum® must receive an acknowledgment of the Author Agreement and Copyright Transfer Statement transferring to Forum Multimedia Publishing, L.L.C., a subsidiary of Carden Jennings Publishing Co., Ltd. the exclusive rights to print and distribute the author(s) work in all media forms. Failure to check Copyright Transfer agreement box below will delay publication of the manuscript.
A current form follows:
The author(s) hereby transfer(s), assign(s), or otherwise convey(s) all copyright ownership of the manuscript submitted to Forum Multimedia Publishing, LLC (Publisher). The copyright transfer covers the exclusive rights to reproduce and distribute the article and the material contained therein throughout the world in all languages and in all media of expression now known or later developed, including but not limited to reprints, photographic reproduction, microfilm, electronic data processing (including programming, storage, and transmission to other electronic data record(s), or any other reproductions of similar nature), and translations.
However, Publisher grants back to the author(s) the following:
- The right to make and distribute copies of all or part of this work for use of the author(s) in teaching;
- The right to use, after publication in The Heart Surgery Forum, all or part of the material from this work in a book by the author(s), or in a collection of work by the author(s);
- The royalty-free right to make copies of this work for internal distribution within the institution/company that employs the author(s) subject to the provisions below for a work-made-for-hire;
- The right to use figures and tables from this work, and up to 250 words of text, for any purpose;
- The right to make oral presentations of material from this work.
Publisher reserves the right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. To republish, such third parties must obtain written permission from the Publisher. (This is in accordance with the Copyright Statute, United States Code, Title 17. Exception: If all authors were bona fide officers or employees of the U.S. Government at the time the paper was prepared, the work is a “work of the US Government” (prepared by an officer or employee of the US Government as part of official duties), and therefore is not subject to US copyright; such exception should be indicated on signature lines. If this work was prepared under US Government contract or grant, the US Government may reproduce, royalty-free, all or portions of this work and may authorize others to do so, for official US Government purposes only, if the US Government contract or grant so requires.
I have participated in the conception and design of this work and in the writing of the manuscript and take public responsibility for it. Neither this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content under my authorship has been published, has been submitted for publication elsewhere, or will be submitted for publication elsewhere while under consideration by The Heart Surgery Forum, except as described in an attachment. I have reviewed this manuscript (original version) and approve its submission. If I am listed above as corresponding author, I will provide all authors with information regarding this manuscript and will obtain their approval before submitting any revision. I attest to the validity, accuracy, and legitimacy of the content of the manuscript and understand that Publisher assumes no responsibility for the validity, accuracy, and legitimacy of its content. I warrant that this manuscript is original with me and that I have full power to make this Agreement. I warrant that it contains no matter that is libelous or otherwise unlawful or that invades individual privacy or infringes any copyright or other proprietary right. I agree to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless of and from any claim made against Publisher that relates to or arises out of the publication of the manuscript and agree that this indemnification shall include payment of all costs and expenses relating to the defense of any such claim, including all reasonable attorney’s fees.
I warrant that I have no financial interest in the drugs, devices, or procedures described in the manuscript (except as disclosed in the attached statement).
I state that the institutional Human Subjects Committee and/or the Ethics Committee approved the clinical protocol reported in this manuscript for the use of experimental techniques, drugs, or devices in human subjects and appropriate informed consent documents were utilized.
Furthermore, I state that any and all animals used for experimental purposes received humane care in USDA registered facilities in compliance with the “Principles of Laboratory Animal Care” formulated by the National Society for Medical Research and the “Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals” prepared by the Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources and published by the National Institutes of Health (NIH Publication No. 85-23, revised 1985).
