Comparison of Fibrinolytic versus Surgical Therapy in the Treatment of Obstructive Prosthetic Valve Thrombosis: A Single-Center Experience

Authors

  • Necip Ermis
  • Hakan Atalay
  • Hakan Altay
  • Muhammet Bilgi
  • Suleyman Binici
  • Alpay T. Sezgin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1532/HSF98.20101062

Abstract

Objective: Prosthetic heart valve thrombosis (PVT) is a rare but severe cardiac condition. There are only a few data regarding comparison of the fibrinolytic and surgical approaches for the treatment of PVT. In this study, we compared the results of fibrinolytic therapy versus surgery in patients who presented to our institution with a diagnosis of obstructive-type PVT.

Methods: From January 2001 to August 2008 in our institution, 33 patients who met clinical and echocardiographic criteria for obstructive-type PVT were included in the study. Fifteen of these patients underwent fibrinolytic treatment with streptokinase, which consisted of an initial bolus of 250,000 U followed by 100,000 U/h. Eighteen patients were treated with surgery.

Results: The 2 groups had similar baseline characteristics, including New York Heart Association functional status, types and positions of prosthetic valves, international normalized ratio values, and presentation symptoms. Full hemodynamic success was achieved in 12 patients who underwent fibrinolytic therapy and in 15 patients in the surgery group. The mean (±SD) streptokinase infusion time was 17.8 ± 11.1 hours. Two major hemorrhages and 2 cases of systemic embolism were observed in the fibrinolytic group. The 2 groups did not differ with respect to mortality rate (P = .79). The duration of hospitalization was longer in the fibrinolytic group than in the surgery group (10.7 ± 6.6 days versus 6.9 ± 6.7 days, P = .045).

Conclusions: Although fibrinolytic therapy is generally recommended for the treatment of PVT for specific patient groups, our results suggest that it may be as efficacious and safe as surgery, depending on patient selection.

References

Agrawal D, Dubey S, Saket B, et al. 1997. Thrombolytic therapy for prosthetic valve thrombosis in Third World countries. Indian Heart J 49:383-6.nAzpitarte J, Sánchez-Ramos J, Urda T, Vivancos R, Oyonarte JM, Malpartida F. 2001. Prosthetic valve thrombosis: which is the most appropriate initial therapy? [in Spanish]. Rev Esp Cardiol 54:1367-76.nBiteker M, Duran NE, Gunduz S, et al. 2008. Comparing different intravenous thrombolytic treatment regimens in patients with prosthetic heart valve thrombosis under the guidance of serial transesophageal echocardiography: a 15-year study in a single center (TROIA Trial). Circulation 118:S932.nCáceres-Lóriga FM, Pérez-López H, Morlans-Hernández K, et al. 2006. Thrombolysis as first choice therapy in prosthetic heart valve thrombosis. A study of 68 patients. J Thromb Thrombolysis 21:185-90.nCáceres-Lóriga FM, Pérez-Ló H, Santos-Gracia J, Morlans-Hernández K. 2006. Prosthetic heart valve thrombosis: pathogenesis, diagnosis and management. Int J Cardiol 110:1-6.nCevik C, Izgi C, Dechyapirom W, Nugent K. 2010. Treatment of prosthetic valve thrombosis: rationale for a prospective randomized clinical trial. J Heart Valve Dis 19:161-70.nDeville E, Ledain L, Roques X, Besse P, Baudet E, Fontant F. 1987. Traitement thrombolytique ou chirurgical dans les thromboses valvulaires. Ann Chir 41:135-42.nDeviri E, Sareli P, Wisenbaugh T, Cronje SL. 1991. Obstruction of mechanical heart valve prostheses: clinical aspects and surgical management. J Am Coll Cardiol 17:646-50.nDurrleman N, Pellerin M, Bouchard D, et al. 2004. Prosthetic valve thrombosis: twenty-year experience at the Montreal Heart Institute. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 127:1388-92.nEdmunds LH Jr, Clark RE, Cohn LH, Grunkemeier GL, Miller DC, Weisel RD. 1996. Guidelines for reporting morbidity and mortality after cardiac valvular operations. Ad Hoc Liaison Committee for Standardizing Definitions of Prosthetic Heart Valve Morbidity of the American Association for Thoracic Surgery and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 112:708-11.nEdmunds LH Jr. 1982. Thromboembolic complications of current cardiac valvular prostheses. Ann Thorac Surg 34:96-106.nGupta D, Kothari SS, Bahl VK, et al. 2000. Thrombolytic therapy for prosthetic valve thrombosis: short- and long-term results. Am Heart J 140:906-16.nHusebye DG, Pluth JR, Piehler JM, et al. 1983. Reoperation on prosthetic heart valves. An analysis of risk factors in 552 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 86:543-52.nKontos GJ Jr, Schaff HV, Orszulak TA, Puga FJ, Pluth JR, Danielson GK. 1989. Thrombotic obstruction of disc valves: clinical recognition and surgical management. Ann Thorac Surg 48:60-5.nKumar S, Garg N, Tewari S, Kapoor A, Goel PK, Sinha N. 2001. Role of thrombolytic therapy for stuck prosthetic valves: a serial echocardiographic study. Indian Heart J 53:451-7.nLengyel M, Vandor L. 2001. The role of thrombolysis in the management of left-sided prosthetic valve thrombosis: a study of 85 cases diagnosed by transesophageal echocardiography. J Heart Valve Dis 10:636-49.nLengyel M. 2005. Thrombolysis should be regarded as first-line therapy for prosthetic valve thrombosis in the absence of contraindications. J Am Coll Cardiol 45:325.nLópez HP, Cáceres Lóriga FM, Hernàndez KM, et al. 2002. Thrombolytic therapy with recombinant streptokinase for prosthetic valve thrombosis. J Card Surg 17:387-93.nLuluaga IT, Carrera D, D'Oliveira J, et al. 1971. Successful thrombolytic therapy after acute tricuspid valve obstruction [letter]. Lancet 1:1067-8.nMartinell J, Jiménez A, Rábago G, Artiz V, Fraile J, Farré J. 1991. Mechanical cardiac valve thrombosis. Is thrombectomy justified? Circulation 84(suppl):III70-5.nMontero CG, Mula N, Brugos R, Tellez G, Figuera D. 1989. Thrombectomy of the Björk-Shiley prosthetic valve revisited: long term results. Ann Thorac Surg 48:824-8.nOzkan M, Kaymaz C, Kirma C, et al. 2000. Intravenous thrombolytic treatment of mechanical prosthetic valve thrombosis: a study using serial transesophageal echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 35:1881-9.nReddy NK, Padmanabhan TN, Singh S, et al. 1994. Thrombolysis in left-sided prosthetic valve occlusion: immediate and follow-up results. Ann Thorac Surg 58:462-70.nReyes-Cerezo E, Jerjes-Sánchez C, Archondo-Arce T, et al. 2008. Fibrinolytic therapy in left side-prosthetic valve acute thrombosis. In depth systematic review. Arch Cardiol Mex 78:309-17.nRoudaut R, Lafitte S, Roudaut MF, et al. 2003. Fibrinolysis of mechanical prosthetic valve thrombosis: a single-center study of 127 cases. J Am Coll Cardiol 41:653-8.nRoudaut R, Roques X, Lafitte S, et al. 2003. Surgery for prosthetic valve obstruction. A single center study of 136 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 24:868-72.nThorburn CW, Morgan JJ, Shanahan MX, Chang VP. 1983. Long-term results of tricuspid valve replacement and the problem of prosthetic valve thrombosis. Am J Cardiol 51:1128-32.nTong AT, Roudaut R, Ozkan M, et al., and Prosthetic Valve Thrombolysis-Role of Transesophageal Echocardiography (PRO-TEE) Registry Investigators. 2004. Transesophageal echocardiography improves risk assessment of thrombolysis of prosthetic valve thrombosis: results of the international PRO-TEE registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 43:77-84.n

Published

2011-04-26

How to Cite

Ermis, N., Atalay, H., Altay, H., Bilgi, M., Binici, S., & Sezgin, A. T. (2011). Comparison of Fibrinolytic versus Surgical Therapy in the Treatment of Obstructive Prosthetic Valve Thrombosis: A Single-Center Experience. The Heart Surgery Forum, 14(2), E87-E92. https://doi.org/10.1532/HSF98.20101062

Issue

Section

Articles