Process Review of a Departmental Change from Conventional Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting to Totally Arterial Coronary Artery Bypass and Its Effects on the Incidence and Severity of Postoperative Stroke

Authors

  • Alexander Albert
  • Paul Sergeant
  • Ines Florath
  • Mohammed Ismael
  • Ulrich Rosendahl
  • Jürgen Ennker

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1532/HSF98.20101099

Abstract

Background: We evaluated the process of changing from conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) to totally arterial off-pump coronary artery bypass (TOPCAB) at a single heart center in Germany.

Methods: We (1) used multivariate statistical methods to assess real-time monitoring of OPCAB effects, (2) conducted a case review to assess preventable deaths and identify areas of improvement, (3) conducted a team survey, and (4) evaluated benchmarking results.

Results: All surgeons and assistants (n = 18) at this center were involved and were guided by the department head and one of the consultants, who was trained in this procedure in 2004 at the Leuven OPCAB school. The frequency of OPCAB operations increased abruptly in 2005 from 5% to 43% and then increased gradually to 67% (n = 546) by 2008 (total, 1781 OPCAB cases and 1563 on-pump cases). The in-hospital and 30-day mortality rates for OPCAB surgeries (n = 10 [0.6%] and 21 [1.2%], respectively) were lower than for on-pump surgeries (n = 27 [1.7%] and 26 [1.7%], respectively). Stroke rates were also lower for OPCAB surgeries (7 cases [0.4%] versus 15 cases [1%]). The lower risk of stroke in the OPCAB group was significant (P < .05) after risk adjustment. Monitoring curves and case reviews demonstrated a preventable death percentage of at least 30%. The attitude of the team was mostly positive because of the promising results (eg, fewer strokes, increasing TOPCAB popularity, and a top national rank).

Conclusions: The change from conventional CABG to TOPCAB was effective in decreasing the incidence and severity of stroke, in developing a team routine and a positive team attitude, and in producing excellent benchmarking results. The presence of a training and communication deficiency at the beginning of the study suggested an area for further improvement. After 6 years TOPCAB had largely replaced conventional CABG.

References

Albert A, Beller CJ, Walter JA, et al. 2003. Preoperative high leukocyte count: a novel risk factor for stroke after cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 75:1550-7.nAlbert A, Hassanein W, Florath I, Voehringer L, Abugameh A, Ennker J. 2008. Technical aspects of composite arterial T-grafts: estimation of required conduit length by a simple formula. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 56:461-6.nAlbert A, Peck EA, Wouters P, Van Hemelrijck J, Bert C, Sergeant P. 2006. Performance analysis of interactive multimodal CME retraining on attitude toward and application of OPCAB. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 131:154-62.nAlbert A, Walter JA, Arnrich B, et al. 2004. On-line variable live-adjusted displays with internal and external risk-adjusted mortalities. A valuable method for benchmarking and early detection of unfavourable trends in cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 25:312-9.nArnrich B, Walter J, Albert A, Ennker J, Ritter H. 2004. Data mart based research in heart surgery: challenges and benefit. Stud Health Technol Inform 107(pt 1):8-12.nBaker JD 3rd, Reines HD, Wallace CT. 1985. Learning style analysis in surgical training. Am Surg 51:494-6.nBanta HD, Vondeling H. 1993. Diffusion of minimally invasive therapy in Europe. Health Policy 23:125-33.nde Leval MR, Carthey J, Wright DJ, Reason JT. 2000. Human factors and cardiac surgery: a multicenter study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 119:661-72.nDirksen CD, Ament AJH, Go P. 1996. Diffusion of six surgical endoscopic procedures in the Netherlands. Stimulating and restraining factors. Health Policy 37:91-104.nEdmondson AC, Winslow AB, Bohmer RMJ, Pisano GP. 2003. Learning how and learning what: effect of tacit and codified knowledge on performance improvement following technology adoption. Decis Sci 34:197-222.nEdmondson AC. 1999. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams, 1999. Adm Sci Q 44:350-83.nGuru V, Tu JV, Etchells E, et al. 2008. Relationship between preventability of death after coronary artery bypass graft surgery and all-cause risk-adjusted mortality rates. Circulation 117:2969-76.nHackman JR, Gersick CJG. 1990. Habitual routines in task-performing teams. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 47:65-97.nHassanein W, Albert AA, Arnrich B, et al. 2005. Intraoperative transit time flow measurement: off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 80:2155-61.nLev-Ran O, Braunstein R, Sharony R, et al. 2005. No-touch aorta off-pump coronary surgery: the effect on stroke. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 129:307-13.nMarch JG, Olsen JP. 1975. The uncertainty of the past: organizational learning under ambiguity. Eur J Polit Res 3:147-71.nNonaka I. 1994. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ Sci 5:14-37.nPeck E, Sergeant P. 2007. Off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery. In: Yuh DD, Vricella LA, Baumgartner WA, eds. The Johns Hopkins manual of cardiothoracic surgery. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. p 449-67.nPoulsen PB, Adamsen S, Vondeling H, Jorgensen T. 1998. Diffusion of laparoscopic technologies in Denmark. Health Policy 45:149-67.nRaja SG. 2005. Pump or no pump for coronary artery bypass: current best available evidence. Tex Heart Inst J 32:489-501.nRoques F, Nashef SA, Michel P, et al. 1999. Risk factors and outcome in European cardiac surgery: analysis of the EuroSCORE multinational database of 19030 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 15:816-22.nSergeant P, Wouters P, Meyns B, et al. 2004. OPCAB versus early mortality and morbidity: an issue between clinical relevance and statistical significance. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 25:779-85.nSong HK, Petersen RJ, Sharoni E, Guyton RA, Puskas JD. 2003. Safe evolution towards routine off-pump coronary artery bypass: negotiating the learning curve. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 24:947-52.nSzulanski G. 2000. The process of knowledge transfer: a diachronic analysis of stickiness. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 82:9-27.nWanzel KR, Ward M, Reznick RK. 2002. Teaching the surgical craft: from selection to certification. Curr Probl Surg 39:573-659.n

Published

2011-04-26

How to Cite

Albert, A., Sergeant, P., Florath, I., Ismael, M., Rosendahl, U., & Ennker, J. (2011). Process Review of a Departmental Change from Conventional Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting to Totally Arterial Coronary Artery Bypass and Its Effects on the Incidence and Severity of Postoperative Stroke. The Heart Surgery Forum, 14(2), E73-E80. https://doi.org/10.1532/HSF98.20101099

Issue

Section

Articles