Comparison of Continuous and Intermittent Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in Postoperative Pain Management after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Prospective Study
Objective: We compared the effectiveness of continuous transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and intermittent TENS in the management of pain after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
Methods: We randomized 100 patients who had undergone median sternotomy for CABG into 4 groups with 25 patients each: (1) continuous TENS (CTENS) and pharmacologic analgesia, (2) intermittent TENS (ITENS) and pharmacologic analgesia, (3) placebo TENS (PTENS) and pharmacologic analgesia, and (4) pharmacologic analgesia alone (control). We studied these groups with regard to the relief of postoperative pain during the first 24 hours. For each patient we recorded the following: demographic characteristics; vital signs; intensity of pain with a visual analogue scale (VAS) before treatment (VAS0), at the 12th hour (VAS12), and at the 24th hour (VAS24); and analgesic intake.
Results: The groups were comparable with respect to age, sex, and body mass index at baseline. Mean VAS scores decreased within each group; however, the mean VAS12 and VAS24 scores decreased significantly in the CTENS and ITENS groups, compared with PTENS and control groups (P < .05). We found no significant difference between the CTENS and ITENS groups with respect to decreasing VAS12 and VAS24 scores (P > .05). Narcotic intake was significantly less in the CTENS and ITENS groups than in the control and PTENS groups (P < .01). Furthermore, narcotic requirements were significantly lower in the CTENS group than in the ITENS group (P < .01).
Conclusions: CTENS and ITENS after median sternotomy for CABG decreased pain and reduced narcotic requirements more than in the PTENS and control treatments during first postoperative 24 hours. Neither CTENS nor ITENS is superior to the other in decreasing pain; however, CTENS leads to a greater reduction in the narcotic requirement than ITENS.
Ali J, Yaffe CS, Serrette C. 1981. The effect of transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation on postoperative pain and pulmonary function. Surgery 89:507-12.nBayindir O, Paker T, Akpinar B, Erenturk S, Askin D, Aytac A. 1991. Use of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in the control of postoperative chest pain after cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 5:589-91.nChapman CR, Syrjala KL. 2001. Measurement of pain. In: Loesser JD, ed. Bonica's management of pain. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott, Williams, & Wilkins. p 311-6.nChulay M, Brown J, Summer W. 1982. Effect of postoperative immobilization after coronary artery bypass surgery. Crit Care Med 10:176-9.nCipriano G Jr, de Camargo Carvalho AC, Bernardelli GF, Tayar Peres PA. 2008. Short-term transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation after cardiac surgery: effect on pain, pulmonary function and electrical muscle activity. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 7:539-43.nCooperman AM, Hall B, Mikalacki K, Hardy R, Sadar E. 1977. Use of transcutaneous electrical stimulation in the control of postoperative pain: results of a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Am J Surg 133:185-7.nEmmiler M, Solak Ö, Kocogullari C, Dundar U, Ayva E, Ela Y, Cekirdekci A, Kavuncu V. 2008. Control of acute postoperative pain by transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation after open cardiac operations: a randomized placebo-controlled prospective study. Heart Surg Forum 11:E300-3.nErdogan M, Erdogan A, Erbil N, Karakaya HK, Demircan A. 2005. Prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled study of the effect of TENS on postthoracotomy pain and pulmonary function. World J Surg 29:1563-70.nFilos KS, Lehmann KA. 1999. Current concepts and practice in postoperative pain management: need for a change? Eur Surg Res 31:97-107.nFitzpatrick GJ, Moriarty DC. 1988. Intrathecal morphine in the management of pain following cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 60:639-44.nForster EL, Kramer JF, Lucy SD, Scudds RA, Novick RJ. 1994. Effect of TENS on pain, medications, and pulmonary function following coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Chest 106:1343-8.nHymes AC, Yonehiro EG, Raab DE, Nelson GD, Printy AL. 1974. Electrical surface stimulation for treatment and prevention of ileus and atelectasis. Surg Forum 25:222-4.nJenkins SC, Soutar SA, Loukota JM, Johnson LC, Moxham J. 1989. Physiotherapy after coronary artery surgery: are breathing exercises necessary? Thorax 44:634-9.nKonstantatos A, Silvers AJ, Myles PS. 2008. Analgesia best practice after cardiac surgery. Anesthesiol Clin 26:591-602.nLocicero J. 2005. General principles of postoperative care. In: Shields TW, Locicero J, Ponn PB, Rusch VW, eds. General thoracic surgery. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott, Williams, & Wilkins. p 601-9.nPasero C, Paice JA, McCaffery M. 1999. Basic mechanisms underlying the causes and effects of pain. In: McCaffery M, Pasero C, eds. Pain: clinical manual. St Louis, Mo: Mosby. p 15-34.nRooney SM, Jain S, McCormack P, Bains MS, Martini N, Goldiner PL. 1986. A comparison of pulmonary function tests for postthoracotomy pain using cryoanalgesia and transcutaneous nerve stimulation. Ann Thorac Surg 41:204-7.nSchomburg FL, Carter-Baker SA. 1983. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for postlaparotomy pain. Phys Ther 63:188-93.nSolak Ö, Turna A, Pekcolaklar A, et al. 2007. Transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation for the treatment of postthoracotomy pain: a randomized prospective study. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 55:182-5.nSoloman BA, Viernstein MC, Long DM. 1980. Reduction of postoperative pain and narcotic use by transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. Surgery 87:142-6.nStratton SA, Smith MM. 1980. Postoperative thoracotomy: effect of transcutaneous nerve stimulation on forced vital capacity. Phys Ther 60:45-7.nVanderArk GD, McGrath KA. 1975. Transcutaneous electrical stimulation in treatment of postoperative pain. Am J Surg 130:338-40.nYeager MP, Glass DD, Neff RK, Brinck-Johnsen T. 1987. Epidural anesthesia and analgesia in high-risk surgical patients. Anesthesiology 66:729-36.n
How to Cite
Author Disclosure & Copyright Transfer Agreement
In order to publish the original work of another person(s), The Heart Surgery Forum® must receive an acknowledgment of the Author Agreement and Copyright Transfer Statement transferring to Forum Multimedia Publishing, L.L.C., a subsidiary of Carden Jennings Publishing Co., Ltd. the exclusive rights to print and distribute the author(s) work in all media forms. Failure to check Copyright Transfer agreement box below will delay publication of the manuscript.
A current form follows:
The author(s) hereby transfer(s), assign(s), or otherwise convey(s) all copyright ownership of the manuscript submitted to Forum Multimedia Publishing, LLC (Publisher). The copyright transfer covers the exclusive rights to reproduce and distribute the article and the material contained therein throughout the world in all languages and in all media of expression now known or later developed, including but not limited to reprints, photographic reproduction, microfilm, electronic data processing (including programming, storage, and transmission to other electronic data record(s), or any other reproductions of similar nature), and translations.
However, Publisher grants back to the author(s) the following:
- The right to make and distribute copies of all or part of this work for use of the author(s) in teaching;
- The right to use, after publication in The Heart Surgery Forum, all or part of the material from this work in a book by the author(s), or in a collection of work by the author(s);
- The royalty-free right to make copies of this work for internal distribution within the institution/company that employs the author(s) subject to the provisions below for a work-made-for-hire;
- The right to use figures and tables from this work, and up to 250 words of text, for any purpose;
- The right to make oral presentations of material from this work.
Publisher reserves the right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. To republish, such third parties must obtain written permission from the Publisher. (This is in accordance with the Copyright Statute, United States Code, Title 17. Exception: If all authors were bona fide officers or employees of the U.S. Government at the time the paper was prepared, the work is a “work of the US Government” (prepared by an officer or employee of the US Government as part of official duties), and therefore is not subject to US copyright; such exception should be indicated on signature lines. If this work was prepared under US Government contract or grant, the US Government may reproduce, royalty-free, all or portions of this work and may authorize others to do so, for official US Government purposes only, if the US Government contract or grant so requires.
I have participated in the conception and design of this work and in the writing of the manuscript and take public responsibility for it. Neither this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content under my authorship has been published, has been submitted for publication elsewhere, or will be submitted for publication elsewhere while under consideration by The Heart Surgery Forum, except as described in an attachment. I have reviewed this manuscript (original version) and approve its submission. If I am listed above as corresponding author, I will provide all authors with information regarding this manuscript and will obtain their approval before submitting any revision. I attest to the validity, accuracy, and legitimacy of the content of the manuscript and understand that Publisher assumes no responsibility for the validity, accuracy, and legitimacy of its content. I warrant that this manuscript is original with me and that I have full power to make this Agreement. I warrant that it contains no matter that is libelous or otherwise unlawful or that invades individual privacy or infringes any copyright or other proprietary right. I agree to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless of and from any claim made against Publisher that relates to or arises out of the publication of the manuscript and agree that this indemnification shall include payment of all costs and expenses relating to the defense of any such claim, including all reasonable attorney’s fees.
I warrant that I have no financial interest in the drugs, devices, or procedures described in the manuscript (except as disclosed in the attached statement).
I state that the institutional Human Subjects Committee and/or the Ethics Committee approved the clinical protocol reported in this manuscript for the use of experimental techniques, drugs, or devices in human subjects and appropriate informed consent documents were utilized.
Furthermore, I state that any and all animals used for experimental purposes received humane care in USDA registered facilities in compliance with the “Principles of Laboratory Animal Care” formulated by the National Society for Medical Research and the “Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals” prepared by the Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources and published by the National Institutes of Health (NIH Publication No. 85-23, revised 1985).