Clinically Important Misclassification of Aortic Valve Stenosis Severity Using Non-Invasive Techniques: Simultaneous Echocardiography and Cardiac Catheterization During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Awake Patients
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1532/hsf.3139Keywords:
aortic stenosis, echocardiography, cardiac catheterization, hemodynamics, valve replacement, transcatheterAbstract
Background: Suitability for transcatheter aortic valve (AV) implantation (TAVI) is determined by using transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), although left-sided cardiac catheterization (LCC) provides directly measured pressure data. TAVI in awake patients permits simultaneous comparison of TTE and LCC under physiologically relevant left ventricular loading conditions. We hypothesized that clinically important discrepancies between TTE and LCC would be identified.
Methods and results: TAVI was performed in 108 awake patients undergoing intra-procedural TTE and LCC between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2016, based upon pre-procedure TTE data. Intra-procedural assessments simultaneously were performed before and after prosthesis implantation. Based upon mean trans-AV systolic ejection pressure gradient (MSEPG), AS was graded as: mild (<20 mm Hg; grade 1), moderate (20 - <40 mm Hg; grade 2), or severe (≥40 mm Hg; grade 3). In 79 of the 108 (73.1%) patients, intra-procedural TTE and LCC assessments were concordant. In 2 of the 108 (1.9%) patients, TTE overestimated AS severity by ≥1 grade. In 27 of the 108 (25.0%) patients, TTE underestimated AS severity by ≥1 grade. In total, AS severity reclassification occurred in 29 (26.9%) patients. Overall, TTE underestimated MSEPG by 8.9 ± 1.2 mm Hg (TTE MSEPG versus LCC MSEPG; P < .001).
Conclusion: Current TTE criteria appear to frequently and importantly underestimate AS severity. Because decision-making regarding TAVI often exclusively is based upon TTE data, these findings suggest either a continued role for LCC in the diagnostic assessment of AS in patients who do not meet standard TTE criteria or lowering TTE cutoffs for TAVI.
References
Adams DH, Popma JJ, Reardon MJ, et al. 2014. U.S. CoreValve Clinical Investigators. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement with a self-expanding prosthesis. New Engl J Med. 370(19):1790-1798.
Andell P, Li X, Martinsson A, et al. 2017. Epidemiology of valvular heart disease in a Swedish nationwide hospital-based register study. Heart. 103(21):1696-1703.
Braunwald E. 2018. Aortic stenosis: then and now. Circulation. May 15;137(20):2099-2100.
Carabello BA, Barry WH, Grossman W. 1979. Changes in arterial pressure during left heart pullback in patients with aortic stenosis: a sign of severe aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol. 44(3):424-427.
Currie PJ, Seward JB, Reeder GS, et al. 1985. Continuous-wave Doppler echocardiographic assessment of severity of calcific aortic stenosis: a simultaneous Doppler-catheter correlative study in 100 patients. Circulation. 71(6):1162-1169.
Ford LE, Feldman T, Chiu YC, Carroll JD. 1990. Hemodynamic resistance as a measure of functional impairment in aortic valvular stenosis. Circ Res. 66(1):1-7.
Gertz ZM, Raina A, O’Donnell W, et al. 2012. Comparison of invasive and non-invasive assessment of aortic stenosis severity in the elderly. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 5(3): 406-414.
Johnson NP, Zelis JM, Tonino PAL, et al. 2018. Pressure gradient vs. flow relationships to characterize the physiology of a severely stenotic aortic valve before and after transcatheter valve implantation. Eur Heart J. 39(28): 2646-2655.
Lauck SB, Wood DA, Achtem L, et al. 2014. Risk stratification and clinical pathways to optimize length of stay after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Can J Cardiol. 30(12):1583-1587.
Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack M, et al. 2010. PARTNER Trial Investigators. Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. New Engl J Med. 363(17):1597-1607.
Oh JK, Taliercio CP, Holmes Jr DR, et al. 1988. Prediction of the severity of aortic stenosis by Doppler aortic valve area determination: prospective Doppler-catheterization correlation in 100 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 11(6): 1227-1234.
Otto CM, Davis KB, Holmes DR Jr, et al. 1992. Methodologic issues in clinical evaluation of stenosis severity in adults undergoing aortic or mitral balloon valvuloplasty. The NHLBI Balloon Valvuloplasty Registry. Am J Cardiol. 69(19):1607-1616.
Otto CM, Kumbhani DJ, Alexander KP, et al. 2017. 2017 ACC expert consensus decision pathway for transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the management of adults with aortic stenosis: a report from the American College of Cardiology Taskforce on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 69(10): 1313-1346.
Parameswaran AC, Reisner D, Amanullah A. 2009. Discrepancy between gradients derived by cardiac catheterization and by Doppler echocardiography in aortic stenosis: how often does pressure recovery play a role? Echocardiography. 26(9):1000-1005.
Popma JJ, Adams DH, Reardon MJ, et al. 2014. CoreValve United States Clinical Investigators. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement using a self-expanding bioprosthesis in patients with severe aortic stenosis at extreme risk for surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 63(19):1972-1981.
Reineke D, Gisler F, Englberger L, Carrel T. 2016. Mechanical versus biological aortic valve replacement strategies. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 14(4):423-430.
Rijsterborgh H, Roelandt J. 1987. Doppler assessment of aortic stenosis: Bernoulli revisited. Ultrasound Med Biol. 13(5):241-248.
Sacchi S, Dhutia NM, Shun-Shin MJ, et al. 2018. Doppler assessment of aortic stenosis: a 25-operator study demonstrating why reading the peak velocity is superior to the velocity-time integral. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. e-pub ahead of print.
Smith CR, Leon MB, Mack MJ, et al. 2011. PARTNER Trial Investigators. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. New Engl J Med. 364(23):2187-2198.
Stamm RB, Martin RP. 1983. Quantification of pressure gradients across stenotic valves by Doppler ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2(4):707-718.
Svihlova H, Hron J, Malek J, Rajagopal KR, Rajagopal K. 2016. Determination of pressure data from velocity with a view toward its application in cardiovascular mechanics. Part 1. Theoretical considerations. Int J Eng Sci. 105(1): 108-127.
Svihlova H, Hron J, Malek J, Rajagopal KR, Rajagopal K. 2017. Determination of pressure data from velocity with a view toward its application in cardiovascular mechanics. Part 2. A study of aortic valve stenosis. Int J Eng Sci. 114(1):1-15.
