A Rare Constrictive Pericarditis with Complete Separation between the Visceral and Parietal Pericardium: A Case Report
Keywords:constrictive pericarditis, Wilson Disease, cirrhosis, pericardiectomy
Background: Pericarditis is the most common form of pericardial disease, while constrictive pericarditis is challenging in diagnosis and is easily overlooked.
Case report: A 30-year-old female presented with abdominal distension and mild lower extremity edema for 3 months. The patient was initially suspected of having cirrhosis caused by Wilson Disease. Following liver biopsy and multiple investigation, thickened, calcified pericardium was detected by echocardiography and chest computed tomography. The patient was finally diagnosed with chronic constrictive pericarditis and received pericardiectomy. Intraoperatively, we found that the heart was entirely constricted by the thickened and calcified visceral pericardium, which was completely separated from the parietal pericardium. The patient received successful pericardiectomy and had relief of symptoms after surgery.
Conclusion: Patients with constrictive pericarditis may present with symptoms similar to that of chronic liver diseases, which makes it difficult and complicated for diagnosis. This case highlights the importance of comprehensive preoperative evaluation and maintaining clinical suspicion of pericarditis in patients with features of elevated systemic venous pressure. In addition, constrictive pericarditis with complete separation between visceral and parietal pericardium has seldom been reported.
Bao L, Huang J, Wang F, Pang L, Wang Y, Shi H. 2018. Echocardiography with elevated central venous pressure diagnosing constrictive pericarditis more accurately than chest CT scan: A retrospective study in 36 cases. Heart Surg Forum 21:E190-3.
Feng D, Glockner J, Kim K, et al. 2011. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging pericardial late gadolinium enhancement and elevated inflammatory markers can predict the reversibility of constrictive pericarditis after antiinflammatory medical therapy: a pilot study. Circulation 124:1830-7.
Imazio M, Brucato A, Maestroni S, et al. 2011. Risk of constrictive pericarditis after acute pericarditis. Circulation 124:1270-5.
Imazio M, Gaita F, LeWinter M. 2015. Evaluation and treatment of pericarditis: A systematic review. JAMA 314:1498-1506.
Laghari AH, Tai JM. 2013. Heavily thickened pericardium with constrictive pericarditis. J Pak Med Assoc 63:639-41.
Ling LH, Oh JK, Schaff HV, et al. 1999. Constrictive pericarditis in the modern era: evolving clinical spectrum and impact on outcome after pericardiectomy. Circulation 100:1380-6.
Schwefer M, Aschenbach R, Heidemann J, Mey C, Lapp H. 2009. Constrictive pericarditis, still a diagnostic challenge: comprehensive review of clinical management. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 36:502-10.
Verhaert D, Gabriel RS, Johnston D, Lytle BW, Desai MY, Klein AL. 2010. The role of multimodality imaging in the management of pericardial disease. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 3:333-43.
Wei S, Zhang L, Cui H, Li L, Ren T, Jiang S. 2019. Surgery for patients with radiation-induced constrictive pericarditis. Heart Surg Forum 22:E466-9.
Welch TD, Ling LH, Espinosa RE, et al. 2014. Echocardiographic diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis: Mayo Clinic criteria. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 7:526-34.
Welch TD, Oh JK. 2015. Constrictive pericarditis: old disease, new approaches. Curr Cardiol Rep 17:20.