Comparison of Conventional and No-Touch Techniques in Harvesting Saphenous Vein for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in View of Endothelial Damage
Background: Optimization of saphenous vein patency for myocardial revascularization.
Objective: The goal of this study was to present the no-touch technique of saphenous vein preparation. This technique consists of harvesting the vein with a pedicle of surrounding tissue, which protects the vein from distension pressure.
Methods: We performed a prospective, randomized study that compared 2 techniques for harvesting saphenous vein-conventional and no-touchin 40 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. We carried out a morphologic study of the endothelium with the aid of light and transmission electron microscopy and an immunohistochemical assessment to identify adenosine, inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in the vein wall.
Results: The integrity of endothelial cell and all vascular layers was maintained better with the no-touch technique than with the conventional procedure. The immunohistochemical assessment revealed that adenosine receptor, iNOS, and VEGF immunoexpression levels were normal or lower in the no-touch group than in the conventional-harvest group, as shown by the staining densities in all layers of the vein wall.
Conclusion: Endothelial integrity and adenosine, iNOS, and VEGF immunoreactivities were better preserved when the no-touch technique was used for vein graft harvesting. The mechanical protection provided by the cushion of surrounding tissue in the no-touch group and the vasorelaxation and thromboresistant activities of nitric oxide may be responsible for the reduction in vasospasms and the improved patency rate.
Angelini GD, Bryan AJ, Williams HM, Morgan R, Newby AC. 1990. Distention promotes platelet and leukocyte adhesion and reduces short-term patency in pig arteriovenous bypass grafts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 99:433-9.nBoerboom LE, Bonchek LI, Kissebah AH, et al. 1980. Effect of surgical trauma on tissue lipids in primate vein grafts: relation to plasma lipids. Circulation 62:I142-7.nCambria RP, Megerman J, Abbott WM. 1985. Endothelial preservation in reversed and in situ autogenous vein grafts. Ann Surg 202:50-5.nFulton GJ, Davies MG, Hagen PO. 1997. Preservation of the endothelium in venous bypass grafts: relevance for graft patency. Asia-Pacific Heart J 6:98-106.nGolledge J. 1997. Vein grafts: haemodynamic forces on the endotheliuma review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 14:333-43.nGuessous I, Bochud M, Theler JM, Gaspoz JM, Pechere-Bertschi A. 2012. 1999-2009 Trends in prevalence, unawareness, treatment and control of hypertension in Geneva, Switzerland. PLoS One 7:e39877.nGundry SR, Jones M, Ishihara T, Ferrans VJ. 1980. Optimal preparation techniques for human saphenous vein grafts. Surgery 88:785-94.nHausmann H, Merker HJ, Hetzer R. 1996. Pressure controlled preparation of the saphenous vein with papaverine for aortocoronary venous bypass. J Card Surg 11:155-62.nHe GW, Rosenfeldt FL, Angus JA. 1993. Pharmacological relaxation of the saphenous vein during harvesting for coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 55:1210-7.nKarabulut H, Karabulut O, Arbak S, et al. 1998. Endothelial injury during the preparation of the saphenous vein for use as coronary bypass graft: a light and electron microscopic study. Arch Turk Soc Cardiol 26:416-24.nKarayannacos PE, Rittgers E, Kakos GS, et al. 1980. Potential role of velocity and wall tension in vein graft failure. J Cardiovasc Surg 21:171-8.nKockx MM, Cambier BA, Bortier HE, De Meyer GR, Van Cauwelaert PA. 1992. The modulation of smooth muscle cell phenotype is an early event in human aorta-coronary saphenous vein grafts. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol 420:155-62.nRaja SG, Haider Z, Ahmad M, Zaman H. 2004. Saphenous vein grafts: to use or not to use? Heart Lung Circ 13:403-9.nRamos JR, Berger K, Mansfield PB, Sauvage LR. 1976. Histologic fate and endothelial changes of distended and nondistended vein grafts. Ann Surg 183:205-28.nRueda F, Souza D, Lima Rde C, et al. 2008. Novel no-touch technique of harvesting the saphenous vein for coronary artery bypass grafting. Arq Bras Cardiol 90:356-62.nSanisoglu I, Caynak B, Onan B, et al. 2011. Comparison of clipping versus ligation of side-branches during saphenous vein graft harvesting: which method is superior? Ann Vasc Surg 25:669-74.nSouza DS, Bomfim V, Skoglund H, et al. 2001. High early patency of saphenous vein graft for coronary artery bypass harvested with surrounding tissue. Ann Thorac Surg 71:797-800.nSouza DS, Christofferson RH, Bomfim V, Filbey D. 1999. "No-touch" technique using saphenous vein harvested with its surrounding tissue for coronary artery bypass grafting maintains an intact endothelium. Scand Cardiovasc J 33:323-9.nThatte HS, Khuri SF. 2001. The coronary artery bypass conduit: I. Intraoperative endothelial ?njury and its implication on graft patency. Ann Thorac Surg 72:2245-52.n
How to Cite
Author Disclosure & Copyright Transfer Agreement
In order to publish the original work of another person(s), The Heart Surgery Forum® must receive an acknowledgment of the Author Agreement and Copyright Transfer Statement transferring to Forum Multimedia Publishing, L.L.C., a subsidiary of Carden Jennings Publishing Co., Ltd. the exclusive rights to print and distribute the author(s) work in all media forms. Failure to check Copyright Transfer agreement box below will delay publication of the manuscript.
A current form follows:
The author(s) hereby transfer(s), assign(s), or otherwise convey(s) all copyright ownership of the manuscript submitted to Forum Multimedia Publishing, LLC (Publisher). The copyright transfer covers the exclusive rights to reproduce and distribute the article and the material contained therein throughout the world in all languages and in all media of expression now known or later developed, including but not limited to reprints, photographic reproduction, microfilm, electronic data processing (including programming, storage, and transmission to other electronic data record(s), or any other reproductions of similar nature), and translations.
However, Publisher grants back to the author(s) the following:
- The right to make and distribute copies of all or part of this work for use of the author(s) in teaching;
- The right to use, after publication in The Heart Surgery Forum, all or part of the material from this work in a book by the author(s), or in a collection of work by the author(s);
- The royalty-free right to make copies of this work for internal distribution within the institution/company that employs the author(s) subject to the provisions below for a work-made-for-hire;
- The right to use figures and tables from this work, and up to 250 words of text, for any purpose;
- The right to make oral presentations of material from this work.
Publisher reserves the right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. To republish, such third parties must obtain written permission from the Publisher. (This is in accordance with the Copyright Statute, United States Code, Title 17. Exception: If all authors were bona fide officers or employees of the U.S. Government at the time the paper was prepared, the work is a “work of the US Government” (prepared by an officer or employee of the US Government as part of official duties), and therefore is not subject to US copyright; such exception should be indicated on signature lines. If this work was prepared under US Government contract or grant, the US Government may reproduce, royalty-free, all or portions of this work and may authorize others to do so, for official US Government purposes only, if the US Government contract or grant so requires.
I have participated in the conception and design of this work and in the writing of the manuscript and take public responsibility for it. Neither this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content under my authorship has been published, has been submitted for publication elsewhere, or will be submitted for publication elsewhere while under consideration by The Heart Surgery Forum, except as described in an attachment. I have reviewed this manuscript (original version) and approve its submission. If I am listed above as corresponding author, I will provide all authors with information regarding this manuscript and will obtain their approval before submitting any revision. I attest to the validity, accuracy, and legitimacy of the content of the manuscript and understand that Publisher assumes no responsibility for the validity, accuracy, and legitimacy of its content. I warrant that this manuscript is original with me and that I have full power to make this Agreement. I warrant that it contains no matter that is libelous or otherwise unlawful or that invades individual privacy or infringes any copyright or other proprietary right. I agree to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless of and from any claim made against Publisher that relates to or arises out of the publication of the manuscript and agree that this indemnification shall include payment of all costs and expenses relating to the defense of any such claim, including all reasonable attorney’s fees.
I warrant that I have no financial interest in the drugs, devices, or procedures described in the manuscript (except as disclosed in the attached statement).
I state that the institutional Human Subjects Committee and/or the Ethics Committee approved the clinical protocol reported in this manuscript for the use of experimental techniques, drugs, or devices in human subjects and appropriate informed consent documents were utilized.
Furthermore, I state that any and all animals used for experimental purposes received humane care in USDA registered facilities in compliance with the “Principles of Laboratory Animal Care” formulated by the National Society for Medical Research and the “Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals” prepared by the Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources and published by the National Institutes of Health (NIH Publication No. 85-23, revised 1985).