Comparison of Conventional and No-Touch Techniques in Harvesting Saphenous Vein for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in View of Endothelial Damage

Authors

  • Onur Sen
  • Suheyla Gonca
  • Seyhun Solakoglu
  • Hakki Dalcik
  • Cannur Dalcik
  • Ahmet Ozkara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1532/HSF98.20131006

Abstract

Background: Optimization of saphenous vein patency for myocardial revascularization.

Objective: The goal of this study was to present the no-touch technique of saphenous vein preparation. This technique consists of harvesting the vein with a pedicle of surrounding tissue, which protects the vein from distension pressure.

Methods: We performed a prospective, randomized study that compared 2 techniques for harvesting saphenous vein-conventional and no-touchin 40 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. We carried out a morphologic study of the endothelium with the aid of light and transmission electron microscopy and an immunohistochemical assessment to identify adenosine, inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in the vein wall.

Results: The integrity of endothelial cell and all vascular layers was maintained better with the no-touch technique than with the conventional procedure. The immunohistochemical assessment revealed that adenosine receptor, iNOS, and VEGF immunoexpression levels were normal or lower in the no-touch group than in the conventional-harvest group, as shown by the staining densities in all layers of the vein wall.

Conclusion: Endothelial integrity and adenosine, iNOS, and VEGF immunoreactivities were better preserved when the no-touch technique was used for vein graft harvesting. The mechanical protection provided by the cushion of surrounding tissue in the no-touch group and the vasorelaxation and thromboresistant activities of nitric oxide may be responsible for the reduction in vasospasms and the improved patency rate.

References

Angelini GD, Bryan AJ, Williams HM, Morgan R, Newby AC. 1990. Distention promotes platelet and leukocyte adhesion and reduces short-term patency in pig arteriovenous bypass grafts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 99:433-9.nBoerboom LE, Bonchek LI, Kissebah AH, et al. 1980. Effect of surgical trauma on tissue lipids in primate vein grafts: relation to plasma lipids. Circulation 62:I142-7.nCambria RP, Megerman J, Abbott WM. 1985. Endothelial preservation in reversed and in situ autogenous vein grafts. Ann Surg 202:50-5.nFulton GJ, Davies MG, Hagen PO. 1997. Preservation of the endothelium in venous bypass grafts: relevance for graft patency. Asia-Pacific Heart J 6:98-106.nGolledge J. 1997. Vein grafts: haemodynamic forces on the endotheliuma review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 14:333-43.nGuessous I, Bochud M, Theler JM, Gaspoz JM, Pechere-Bertschi A. 2012. 1999-2009 Trends in prevalence, unawareness, treatment and control of hypertension in Geneva, Switzerland. PLoS One 7:e39877.nGundry SR, Jones M, Ishihara T, Ferrans VJ. 1980. Optimal preparation techniques for human saphenous vein grafts. Surgery 88:785-94.nHausmann H, Merker HJ, Hetzer R. 1996. Pressure controlled preparation of the saphenous vein with papaverine for aortocoronary venous bypass. J Card Surg 11:155-62.nHe GW, Rosenfeldt FL, Angus JA. 1993. Pharmacological relaxation of the saphenous vein during harvesting for coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 55:1210-7.nKarabulut H, Karabulut O, Arbak S, et al. 1998. Endothelial injury during the preparation of the saphenous vein for use as coronary bypass graft: a light and electron microscopic study. Arch Turk Soc Cardiol 26:416-24.nKarayannacos PE, Rittgers E, Kakos GS, et al. 1980. Potential role of velocity and wall tension in vein graft failure. J Cardiovasc Surg 21:171-8.nKockx MM, Cambier BA, Bortier HE, De Meyer GR, Van Cauwelaert PA. 1992. The modulation of smooth muscle cell phenotype is an early event in human aorta-coronary saphenous vein grafts. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol 420:155-62.nRaja SG, Haider Z, Ahmad M, Zaman H. 2004. Saphenous vein grafts: to use or not to use? Heart Lung Circ 13:403-9.nRamos JR, Berger K, Mansfield PB, Sauvage LR. 1976. Histologic fate and endothelial changes of distended and nondistended vein grafts. Ann Surg 183:205-28.nRueda F, Souza D, Lima Rde C, et al. 2008. Novel no-touch technique of harvesting the saphenous vein for coronary artery bypass grafting. Arq Bras Cardiol 90:356-62.nSanisoglu I, Caynak B, Onan B, et al. 2011. Comparison of clipping versus ligation of side-branches during saphenous vein graft harvesting: which method is superior? Ann Vasc Surg 25:669-74.nSouza DS, Bomfim V, Skoglund H, et al. 2001. High early patency of saphenous vein graft for coronary artery bypass harvested with surrounding tissue. Ann Thorac Surg 71:797-800.nSouza DS, Christofferson RH, Bomfim V, Filbey D. 1999. "No-touch" technique using saphenous vein harvested with its surrounding tissue for coronary artery bypass grafting maintains an intact endothelium. Scand Cardiovasc J 33:323-9.nThatte HS, Khuri SF. 2001. The coronary artery bypass conduit: I. Intraoperative endothelial ?njury and its implication on graft patency. Ann Thorac Surg 72:2245-52.n

Published

2013-08-19

How to Cite

Sen, O., Gonca, S., Solakoglu, S., Dalcik, H., Dalcik, C., & Ozkara, A. (2013). Comparison of Conventional and No-Touch Techniques in Harvesting Saphenous Vein for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in View of Endothelial Damage. The Heart Surgery Forum, 16(4), E177-E183. https://doi.org/10.1532/HSF98.20131006

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)