Comparison of P-Wave Duration and Dispersion in Mitral Valve Replacement Surgery Via Right Atrial Transseptal or Left Atrial Approach in Rheumatic Mitral Stenosis Patients

Authors

  • Hakan Gocer Department of Cardiology, Medical Park Usak Hospital, Usak, Turkey
  • Ahmet Baris Durukan Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Medical Park Usak Hospital, Usak, Turkey
  • Ahmet Unlu Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Medical Park Usak Hospital, Usak, Turkey
  • Mustafa Unal Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Bicard Clinic, Bishkek, Krygyzystan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1532/hsf.2667

Keywords:

Arrhythmias, cardiac; mitral valve stenosis; heart valve prosthesis; electrocardiography

Abstract

Background: Predisposition to atrial fibrillation in mitral valve surgery has been well demonstrated. The changes in electrocardiographic parameters (Pmax, Pmin and P-wave dispersion) related to AF risk are unknown. We aimed to document the relationship between electrocardiographic changes and mitral valve replacement through right or left atrial surgical approaches.

Methods: We retrospectively studied 154 patients, who underwent mitral valve replacement surgery from 2008 to 2018. Seventy-nine patients were operated with right atriotomy and transseptal approach (Group 1), and 75 patents were operated with left atriotomy (Group 2). ECGs obtained at hospital admittance and postoperatively at 24 hours were blindly analyzed.

Results: Preoperative demographic characteristics were similar. Pmax, Pmin and P-wave dispersion were similar preoperatively. All parameters increased in both groups compared with the preoperative values (P < .05). Postoperative Pmax, Pmin and P-wave dispersion all were statistically significantly higher with the right atrial approach (P < .05). Postoperative AF also was more common in Group 1 (P < .05).

Conclusion: Right atrial approach may lead to higher P-wave changes and atrial arrhythmias. This may be due to more extensive surgical disruption. The changes in atrial anatomic structure can increase atrial arrhythmic propensity and can cause atrial fibrillation.

References

Aytemir K, Ozer N, Atalar E, Sade E, Aksöyek S et al. 2000. P wave dispersion on 12-lead electrocardiography in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 23: 1109-12.

Demirkan B, Guray Y, Guray U, Ege MR, Kisacik HL et al. 2013. The acute effect of percutaneous mitral balloon valvuloplasty on atrial electromechanical delay and p-wave dispersion in patients with mitral stenosis. Herz. 38:210-5.

Durukan AB, Gurbuz HA, Unal EU, Tavlasoglu M, Durukan E et al. 2014. Role of neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio in assessing the risk of postoperative atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 55:287-93.

Gaudino M, Alessandrini F, Glieca F, Martinelli L, Santarelli P et al. 1997. Conventional left atrial versus superior septal approach for mitral valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 63:1123-7.

Iung B, Leenhardt A, Extramiana F. 2018. Management of atrial fibrillation in patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis. Heart 104:1062-8.

Kazemi B, Rostami A, Aslanabadi N, Ghaffari S. 2014. Electrocardiographic p-wave indices as a useful tool to predict successful percutaneous balloon mitral valvotomy in patients with mitral stenosis. J Cardiovasc Thorac Res 6:9-14.

Lomivorotov VV, Efremov SM, Pokushalov EA, Karaskov AM. 2016. New onset atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: pathophysiology, prophylaxis and treatment. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 30:200-16.

Magnani JW, Mazzini MJ, Sullivan LM, Williamson M, Ellinor PT et al. 2010. p-wave indices, distribution and quality control assessment (from the Framingham Heart Study). Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 15:77-84.

Mehta CK, McCarthy PM, Andrei AC, Kruse J, Shi H et al. 2018. De novo atrial fibrillation after mitral valve surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 156:1515-25.

Mutjaba SS, Clark SC. 2018. Extended trans-septal versus left atrial approach in mitral valve surgery: 1017 patients' experience. Heart Asia. 10:e011008.

Nienaber JJ, Glower DD. 2006. Minitransseptal versus left atrial approach to the mitral valve: a comparison of outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg 82:834-9.

Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP 3rd et al. 2017. 2017 AHA/ACC focused update of the 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 135:e1159-95.

O'Brien B, Burrage PS, Ngai JY, Prutkin JM, Huang CC et al. 2019. Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists/European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthetists practice advisory for the management of perioperative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 33:12-26.

Okutucu S, Aytemir K, Oto A. 2016. P-wave dispersion: What we know till now? JRSM Cardiovasc Dis 5:2048004016639443.

Rezahosseini O, Rezaei M, Ahmadi Tafti SH, Jalali A, Bina P et al. 2015. Transseptal approach versus left atrial approach to mitral valve: a propensity score matching study. J Tehran Heart Cent 10:188-93.

Takenaka K, Ogawa E, Wada H, Hirata T. 2006. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome and surgical stress in thoracic surgery. J Crit Care 21:48-53.

Toutouzas K, Synetos A, Drakopoulou M, Stefanadi E, Tousoulis D et al. 2009. The role of inflammation in atrial fibrillation: a myth or a fact? Am J Med Scis 338:494-499.

Van Wagoner DR, Chung MK. 2018. Inflammation, Inflammasome activation, and atrial fibrillation. Circulation 138:2243-6.

Wong T, Davlouros PA, Li W, Millington-Sanders C et al. 2004. Mechano-electrical interaction late after fontan operation; relation between p-wave duration and dispersion, right atrial size, and atrial arrhythmias. Circulation 109:2319-25.

Published

2020-03-11

How to Cite

Gocer, H., Durukan, A. B., Unlu, A., & Unal, M. (2020). Comparison of P-Wave Duration and Dispersion in Mitral Valve Replacement Surgery Via Right Atrial Transseptal or Left Atrial Approach in Rheumatic Mitral Stenosis Patients. The Heart Surgery Forum, 23(2), E118-E122. https://doi.org/10.1532/hsf.2667

Issue

Section

Article