Comparison of Anterior Mitral Leaflet Repair Techniques with and without the Use of Chordal Replacement in Patients with Degenerative Mitral Valve Insufficiency
Background: The aim of our study was to compare the outcome of patients who underwent mitral valve anterior leaflet repair with and without chordal replacement for degenerative mitral valve insufficiency.
Methods: This study was conducted at our center between May 2006 and May 2013. The study included 125 patients with degenerative mitral valve insufficiency (64 males, 61 females; mean age 47 years, age range 16-78 years) who underwent mitral valve repair with anterior leaflet procedures. The patients were divided into 2 groups. Group A consisted of 56 patients with chordal replacement, and group B consisted of 69 patients with other repair
Results: No significant difference was determined between the 2 groups in mortality, recurrence, and reoperation rates. The mortality rate was 3.6% in group A and 1.4% in group B. During the follow-up period, 3 patients were reoperated on (mitral valve replacement) because of severe mitral valve insufficiency. Two of these patients were from group A (3.6%), and the other was from group B (1.4%). One patient in group A underwent intraoperative mitral valve replacement after unsuccessful chordal replacement. Fifty patients (89.3%) in group A and 65 patients (94.2%) in group B exhibited no or mild recurrence of mitral
Conclusion: Mitral valve repair in patients with degenerative mitral valve insufficiency resulting from anterior leaflet pathology is a safe procedure because of its durability and good long-term results. Despite the difficulty of the chordal replacement procedure, it may be used as an alternative technique for anterior mitral valve leaflet repair.
Braunberger E, Deloche A, Berrebi A, et al. 2001. Very long-term results (more than 20 years) of valve repair with Carpentier’s techniques in nonrheumatic mitral valve insufficiency. Circulation 104(12 suppl 1):I8-11.
Calafiore AM, Di Mauro M, Iacò AL, et al. 2006. Overreduction of the posterior annulus in surgical treatment of degenerative mitral regurgitation. Ann Thorac Surg 81:1310-6.
Castillo JG, Anyanwu AC, El-Eshmawi A, Adams DH. 2014. All anterior and bileaflet mitral valve prolapses are repairable in the modern era of reconstructive surgery. Eur J Cardiothoracic Surg 45:139-45; discussion 145.
David TE, Armstrong S, Ivanov J. 2013. Chordal replacement with polytetrafluoroethylene sutures for mitral valve repair: a 25-year experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 145:1563-9.
David TE, Ivanov J, Armstrong S, Christie D, Rakowski H. 2005. A comparison of outcomes of mitral valve repair for degenerative disease with posterior, anterior, and bileaflet prolapse. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 130:1242-9.
David TE, Omran A, Armstrong S, Sun Z, Ivanov J. 1998. Long-term results of mitral valve repair for myxomatous disease with and without chordal replacement with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene sutures. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 115:1279-85; discussion 1285-6.
DiBardino DJ, ElBardissi AW, McClure RS, Razo-Vasquez OA, Kelly NE, Cohn LH. 2010. Four decades of experience with mitral valve repair: analysis of differential indications, technical evolution, and long-term outcome. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg;139:76-83; discussion 83-4.
Dumont E, Gillinov AM, Blackstone EH, et al. 2007. Reoperation after mitral valve repair for degenerative disease. Ann Thorac Surg 84:444-50; discussion 450.
Frater RW, Vetter HO, Zussa C, Dahm M. 1990. Chordal replacement in mitral valve repair. Circulation 82(5 suppl):IV125-30.
Gammie JS, Sheng S, Griffith BP, et al. 2009. Trends in mitral valve surgery in the United States: results from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database. Ann Thorac Surg 87:1431-7; discussion 1437-9.
Gan HL, Zhang JQ, Wang SX, et al. 2008. [Repair of anterior leaflet mitral valve prolapse: the comparison between chordal replacement and chordal shortening]. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 46:1727-9. Chinese.
Gillinov AM, Blackstone EH, Alaulaqi A, et al. 2008. Outcomes after repair of the anterior mitral leaflet for degenerative disease. Ann Thorac Surg 86:708-17.
Goldsmith IRA, Lip GYH, Patel RL. 2001. A prospective study of changes in the quality of life of patients following mitral valve repair and replacement. Eur J Cardiothoracic Surg 20:949-55.
Jokinen JJ, Hippeläinen MJ, Pitkänen OA, Hartikainen JEK. 2007. Mitral valve replacement versus repair: propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 84:451-8.
Kuntze T, Borger MA, Falk V, et al. 2008. Early and mid-term results of mitral valve repair using premeasured Gore-Tex loops (‘loop technique’). Eur J Cardiothoracic Surg 33:566-72.
Mohty D, Orszulak TA, Schaff HV, Avierinos JF, Tajik JA, Enriquez-Sarano M. 2001. Very long-term survival and durability of mitral valve repair for mitral valve prolapse. Circulation 104(12 suppl 1):I1-7.
Morimoto H, Tsuchiya K, Nakajima M, Akashi O. 2008. Mitral valve repair for anterior leaflet prolapse: surgical techniques review and 16-year follow-up results. J Card Surg 23:426-30.
Okada Y, Nasu M, Koyama T, et al. 2012. Outcomes of mitral valve repair for bileaflet prolapse. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 143(4 suppl):S21-3.
Phillips MR, Daly RC, Schaff HV, Dearani JA, Mullany CJ, Orszulak TA. 2000. Repair of anterior leaflet mitral valve prolapse: chordal replacement versus chordal shortening. Ann Thorac Surg 69:25-9.
Sand ME, Naftel DC, Blackstone EH, Kirklin JW, Karp RB. 1987. A comparison of repair and replacement for mitral valve incompetence. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 94:208-19.
Smedira NG, Selman R, Cosgrove DM, et al. 1996. Repair of anterior leaflet prolapse: chordal transfer is superior to chordal shortening. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 112:287-91; discussion 291-2.
Zoghbi WA, Enriquez-Sarano M, Foster E, et al. 2003. Recommendations for evaluation of the severity of native valvular regurgitation with two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 16:777-802.
Author Disclosure & Copyright Transfer Agreement
In order to publish the original work of another person(s), The Heart Surgery Forum® must receive an acknowledgment of the Author Agreement and Copyright Transfer Statement transferring to Forum Multimedia Publishing, L.L.C., a subsidiary of Carden Jennings Publishing Co., Ltd. the exclusive rights to print and distribute the author(s) work in all media forms. Failure to check Copyright Transfer agreement box below will delay publication of the manuscript.
A current form follows:
The author(s) hereby transfer(s), assign(s), or otherwise convey(s) all copyright ownership of the manuscript submitted to Forum Multimedia Publishing, LLC (Publisher). The copyright transfer covers the exclusive rights to reproduce and distribute the article and the material contained therein throughout the world in all languages and in all media of expression now known or later developed, including but not limited to reprints, photographic reproduction, microfilm, electronic data processing (including programming, storage, and transmission to other electronic data record(s), or any other reproductions of similar nature), and translations.
However, Publisher grants back to the author(s) the following:
- The right to make and distribute copies of all or part of this work for use of the author(s) in teaching;
- The right to use, after publication in The Heart Surgery Forum, all or part of the material from this work in a book by the author(s), or in a collection of work by the author(s);
- The royalty-free right to make copies of this work for internal distribution within the institution/company that employs the author(s) subject to the provisions below for a work-made-for-hire;
- The right to use figures and tables from this work, and up to 250 words of text, for any purpose;
- The right to make oral presentations of material from this work.
Publisher reserves the right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. To republish, such third parties must obtain written permission from the Publisher. (This is in accordance with the Copyright Statute, United States Code, Title 17. Exception: If all authors were bona fide officers or employees of the U.S. Government at the time the paper was prepared, the work is a “work of the US Government” (prepared by an officer or employee of the US Government as part of official duties), and therefore is not subject to US copyright; such exception should be indicated on signature lines. If this work was prepared under US Government contract or grant, the US Government may reproduce, royalty-free, all or portions of this work and may authorize others to do so, for official US Government purposes only, if the US Government contract or grant so requires.
I have participated in the conception and design of this work and in the writing of the manuscript and take public responsibility for it. Neither this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content under my authorship has been published, has been submitted for publication elsewhere, or will be submitted for publication elsewhere while under consideration by The Heart Surgery Forum, except as described in an attachment. I have reviewed this manuscript (original version) and approve its submission. If I am listed above as corresponding author, I will provide all authors with information regarding this manuscript and will obtain their approval before submitting any revision. I attest to the validity, accuracy, and legitimacy of the content of the manuscript and understand that Publisher assumes no responsibility for the validity, accuracy, and legitimacy of its content. I warrant that this manuscript is original with me and that I have full power to make this Agreement. I warrant that it contains no matter that is libelous or otherwise unlawful or that invades individual privacy or infringes any copyright or other proprietary right. I agree to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless of and from any claim made against Publisher that relates to or arises out of the publication of the manuscript and agree that this indemnification shall include payment of all costs and expenses relating to the defense of any such claim, including all reasonable attorney’s fees.
I warrant that I have no financial interest in the drugs, devices, or procedures described in the manuscript (except as disclosed in the attached statement).
I state that the institutional Human Subjects Committee and/or the Ethics Committee approved the clinical protocol reported in this manuscript for the use of experimental techniques, drugs, or devices in human subjects and appropriate informed consent documents were utilized.
Furthermore, I state that any and all animals used for experimental purposes received humane care in USDA registered facilities in compliance with the “Principles of Laboratory Animal Care” formulated by the National Society for Medical Research and the “Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals” prepared by the Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources and published by the National Institutes of Health (NIH Publication No. 85-23, revised 1985).