Pulmonary Function Testing and Outcomes after Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

  • Suraj Raheja Heart and Vascular Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA
  • Hassan Nemeh Heart and Vascular Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA
  • Celeste Williams Heart and Vascular Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA
  • Cristina Tita Heart and Vascular Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA
  • Yelena Selektor Heart and Vascular Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA
  • Themistokles Chamogeorgiakis Heart and Vascular Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA
  • David Lanfear Heart and Vascular Institute, and Center for Individualized and Genomic Medicine Research, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA

Abstract

Background: Pulmonary function testing (PFT) is often done during workup prior to left ventricular assist devices (LVAD), but its utility for predicting outcomes and changes in pulmonary function post-LVAD is not well established. We assessed the association of baseline PFT metrics with outcomes after LVAD, and quantified the changes in PFTs post-LVAD.

Methods and results: A retrospective study of 178 patients receiving continuous flow LVADs was conducted. A total of 129 subjects had baseline PFT data and 54 of these had repeat tests after LVAD. We collected PFT data (FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC ratios, and DLCO) at baseline and post-LVAD, and tested the association with survival, right heart failure, quality of life (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire [KCCQ]) and functional capacity (six-minute walking distance [6MWD]). Proportional hazards and linear regressions determined relationships between baseline PFT data and survival time and functional outcomes, respectively. Paired t-tests compared pre- and post- LVAD PFT variables. There was no association of baseline PFT parameters with survival time post-LVAD (all P > .2), nor the incidence of perioperative RV failure (all P > .15). There were no significant associations of the baseline PFT metrics with the change in KCCQ or 6MWD.  There were statistically significant declines in FEV1, FEV1/FVC ratio, and DLCO after LVAD (P < .05).

Conclusion: In this single center study, there was no relationship between baseline PFTs and post-LVAD outcomes, and PFT parameters often worsened after LVAD. Further studies are needed to determine whether PFTs are useful in this setting, and what, if any, impact LVAD therapy has on pulmonary function.

References

Arena R, Humphrey R, McCall R. 1999. Altered exercise pulmonary function after left ventricular assist device implantation. J Cardiopulm Rehab 19:344-6.

Braun SR, Birnbaum ML, Chopra PS. 1978. Pre- and post-operative pulmonary function abnormalities in coronary artery revascularization surgery. Chest 73:316-20.

Cohen A, Katz M, Katz R, Hauptman E, Schaschner A. 1995. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thoracic Cardiovasc Surg 109:574-81.

Hosenpud JD, Stibolt TA, Atwal K, Shelley D. 1990. Abnormal pulmonary function specifically related to congestive heart failure: comparison of patients before and after cardiac transplantation. Am J Med 88:493-6.

Kartha V, Gomez W, Wu B, et al. 2008. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a patient with an implantable left ventricular assist device. Brit J Anesthesiol 100:652-5.

Kondapaneni M, Sadanala U, Slaughter M, Perez R. 2011. Pulmonary mechanics and gas transfer after VAD implantation: Pilot study of pulmonary function test measures before and after LVAD implantation. Chest 140:889A.

Kruger S, Hoffman R, Skobel E, Breuer C, Janssens U, Hanrath P. 2002. Impairment of ventilator parameters and exercise capacity in patients with pulmonary hypertension and chronic heart insufficiency. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 127:839-44.

Lizak MK, Zakliczynski M, Jarosz A, Zembala M. 2009. The influence of chronic heart failure on pulmonary function tests in patients undergoing orthotopic heart transplantation. Transplant Proc 41:3194-7.

Mohamedali B, Bhat G, Yost G, Tatooles A. 2015. Change in spirometry after left ventricular assist device implantation. Artificial Organs 39:1046-68.

Naum CC, Sciurba FC, Rogers RM. 1992. Pulmonary function abnormalities in chronic severe cardiomyopathy preceding cardiac transplantation. Am Rev Respir Dis 145:1334-8.

Olson TP, Denzer DL, Sinnett WL, et al. 2013. Prognostic value of resting pulmonary function in heart failure. Clin Med Insights Circ Respir Pulm Med 7:35-43.

Roberts SM, Hovord DG, Kodavatiganti R, et al. 2015. Ventricular assist devices and non-cardiac surgery. BMC Anesthesiology 15:185.

Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, et al. 2011. Heart disease and stroke statistics – 2011 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 123:e18-e209.

Rogers JG, Butler J, Lansman SL, et al. 2007. Chronic mechanical circulatory support for inotrope-dependent heart failure patients who are not transplant candidates: results of the INTrEPID Trial. JACC 50:741-7.

Rose EA, Gelijns AC, Moskowitz AJ, et al. 2001. Long term use of a left ventricular assist device for end-stage heart failure. NEJM 345:1433-5.

Schechter MA, Castleberry AW, Kuchibhatla M, et al. 2014. The utility of pulmonary function tests in predicting pulmonary outcomes following destination therapy left ventricular assist device placement. J Heart Lung Transplantation 33:4S60.

Yost G, Mohamedali B, Jandura D, Sayer G, Bhat G. 2014. Pulmonary function is associated with length of stay and survival in patients receiving permanent left ventricular assist devices. J Cardiac Failure 20:8S54.

Published
2019-05-08
Section
Articles