Can Tricuspid Annuloplasty of the Donor Heart Reduce Valve Insufficiency following Cardiac Transplantation with Bicaval Anastomosis?

Authors

  • Alfredo I. Fiorelli
  • José L. Oliveira
  • Ronaldo H. B. Santos
  • Guilherme B. Coelho
  • Adriana S. Oliveira
  • Domingos D. Lourenço-Filho
  • Gisele Lapenna
  • Ricardo R. Dias
  • Fernando Bacal
  • Edimar A. Bocchi
  • Noedir A. G. Stolf

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1532/HSF98.20091146

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the degree of tricuspid valve insufficiency after orthotopic cardiac transplantation with bicaval anastomosis and prophylactic donor heart annuloplasty.

Methods: At present, our cardiac transplantation experience includes 478 cases. After January 2002, we included 30 consecutive patients in this study who had undergone orthotopic cardiac transplantation and survived >6 months. The patients were divided into 2 groups: group I, 15 patients who underwent transplantation with prophylactic tricuspid annuloplasty on the donor heart with the De Vega technique; and group II, 15 patients who underwent transplantation without this procedure. Their preoperative clinical characteristics were the same. During the late postoperative follow-up, the degree of tricuspid insufficiency was evaluated by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography and assessed according to the Simpson scale: 0, absent; 1, mild; 2, moderate; and 3, severe. Hemodynamic parameters were evaluated invasively by means of a Swan-Ganz catheter during routine endomyocardial biopsies.

Results: The mean follow-up time was 26.9 ± 5.4 months (range, 12-36 months). In group I, 1 patient (6.6%) died from infection in the 18th month after the operation; the death was not related to the annuloplasty. In group II, 1 death (6.6%) occurred after 10 months because of rejection (P > .05). After the 24-month follow-up, the mean degree of tricuspid insufficiency was 0.4 ± 0.5 in group I and 1.7 ± 0.9 in group II (P < .05). Similarly, the 2 groups were significantly different with respect to the right atrium pressure, which was higher in group II.

Conclusions: Prophylactic tricuspid annuloplasty on the donor heart was able to reduce significantly the degree of valvular insufficiency, even in cardiac transplantation with bicaval anastomosis; however, it did not modify significantly the hemodynamic performance of the allograft during the investigation period. It is very important to extend the observation period and casuistics to verify other benefits that this technique may offer.

References

Anderson CA, Shernan SK, Leacche M, et al. 2004. Severity of intraoperative tricuspid regurgitation predicts poor late survival following cardiac transplantation. Ann Thorac Surg 78:1635-42.nAziz TM, Saad RA, Burgess MI, Campbell CS, Yonan NA. 2002. Clinical significance of tricuspid valve dysfunction after orthotopic heart transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 21:1101-8.nBrown NE, Muehlebach GF, Jones P, Gorton ME, Stuart RS, Borkon AM. 2004. Tricuspid annuloplasty significantly reduces early tricuspid regurgitation after biatrial heart transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 23:1160-2.nChan MC, Giannetti N, Kato T, et al. 2001. Severe tricuspid regurgitation after heart transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 20:709-17.nDe Simone R, Lange R, Sack RU, Mehmanesh H, Hagl S. 1995. Atrioventricular valve insufficiency and atrial geometry after orthotopic heart transplantation. Ann Thorac Surg 60:1686-93.nFiorelli AI, Coelho GH, Oliveira JL Jr, et al. 2009. Endomyocardial biopsy as risk factor in the development of tricuspid insufficiency after heart transplantation. Transplant Proc 41:935-7.nFiorelli AI, Stolf NA, Abreu Filho CA, et al. 2007. Prophylactic donor tricuspid annuloplasty in orthotopic bicaval heart transplantation. Transplant Proc 39:2527-30.nJeevanandam V, Russell H, Mather P, et al. 2004. A one-year comparison of prophylactic donor tricuspid annuloplasty in heart transplantation. Ann Thorac Surg 78:759-66.nJeevanandam V, Russell H, Mather P, Furukawa S, Anderson A, Raman J. 2006. Donor tricuspid annuloplasty during orthotopic heart transplantation: long-term results of a prospective controlled study. Ann Thorac Surg 82:2089-95.nMielniczuk L, Haddad H, Davies RA, Veinot JP. 2005. Tricuspid valve chordal tissue in endomyocardial biopsy specimens of patients with significant tricuspid regurgitation. J Heart Lung Transplant 24:1586-90.nMugge A, Daniel W, Herrmann G, Simon R, Lichtlen PR. 1990. Quantification of tricuspid regurgitation by Doppler color flow mapping after cardiac transplantation. Am J Cardiol 66:884-7.nNguyen V, Cantarovich M, Cecere R, Giannetti N. 2005. Tricuspid regurgitation after cardiac transplantation: How many biopsies are too many? J Heart Lung Transplant 24:S227-31.nSahar G, Stamler A, Erez E, et al. 1997. Etiological factors influencing the development of atrioventricular valve incompetence after heart transplantation. Transplant Proc 29:2675-6.nSarsam MA, Campbell CS, Yonan NA, Deiraniya AK, Rahman AN. 1993. An alternative surgical technique in orthotopic cardiac transplantation. J Card Surg 8:344-9.n

Published

2010-06-09

How to Cite

Fiorelli, A. I., Oliveira, J. L., Santos, R. H. B., Coelho, G. B., Oliveira, A. S., Lourenço-Filho, D. D., Lapenna, G., Dias, R. R., Bacal, F., Bocchi, E. A., & Stolf, N. A. G. (2010). Can Tricuspid Annuloplasty of the Donor Heart Reduce Valve Insufficiency following Cardiac Transplantation with Bicaval Anastomosis?. The Heart Surgery Forum, 13(3), E168-E171. https://doi.org/10.1532/HSF98.20091146

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)