Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery Grafting in Women: A Word of Caution
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1532/hsf.2067Abstract
Background: Despite the superior hemodynamic performance of internal thoracic arteries, total arterial revascularization with exclusive bilateral internal thoracic arteries (BITA) is less frequently used especially in specific subsets of patients, including females. We report our experience with total arterial revascularization with exclusive BITA regardless of sex and analyze the impact of female sex on the early and midterm outcomes.
Methods: Total arterial revascularization with exclusive BITA was performed with equal frequency in females (79/99, 80%) and males (392/477, 82%; P = .68) undergoing isolated CABG for 3-vessel disease. Pre, intra and postoperative data were compared between these two groups.
Results: Complete revascularization was achieved in 77% of females and 72% of males (P = .08). Early mortality did not differ between the groups (6.3% versus 4.6%,
P = .7). The incidence of re-sternotomy for bleeding, postoperative stroke, myocardial infarction, new onset atrial fibrillation, and hemofiltration for renal failure did not differ between the two groups. However, there were significantly more wound revision for combined superficial and deep sternal wound infection in females (26.5% versus 5.1%, P = .0001). Nevertheless, midterm survival, freedom from repeat revascularization, myocardial infarction, stroke, and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebral events at five years were very good and compared favorably between females and males.
Conclusions: Our findings suggest that total arterial myocardial revascularization with exclusive internal thoracic arteries in females carries the same midterm benefits as in males. Early outcomes are comparable except for a higher incidence of wound revision for combined superficial and deep sternal wound infections in females compared to males. Benefits of bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting in females should be weighed against increased risk of early wound revision.
References
Bukkapatnam RN, Yeo KK, Li Z, et al. 2010. Operative mortality in women and men undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (from the California Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Outcomes Reporting Program). Am J Cardiol 105:339-42.
Cameron A, Davis KB, Green, G, et al. 1996. Coronary bypass surgery with internal-thoracic-artery grafts—effects on survival over a 15-year period. N Engl J Med 334:216-20.
Dubert M, Pourbaix A, Alkhoder S, et al. 2015. Sternal wound Infection after cardiac surgery: Management and outcome. PLoS ONE 10:e0139122.
Ennker IC, Albert A, Pietrowski D, et al. 2009. Impact of gender on outcome after coronary artery bypass surgery. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 17:253-8.
Farkouh ME, Domanski M, Sleeper LA, et al. 2012. Strategies for multivessel revascularization in patients with diabetes. N Engl J Med 367:2375-84.
Gansera B, Gillrath G, Lieber M, et al. 2004. Are men treated better than women? Outcome of male versus female patients after CABG using bilateral internal thoracic arteries. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 52:261-7.
Gatti G, Maschietto L, Morosin M, et al. 2017. Routine use of bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting in women: A risk factor analysis for poor outcomes. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 18:40-6.
Hillis LD, Smith PK, Anderson JL, et al. 2012. 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 143:4-34. Erratum in: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012;143:1235.
Itagaki S, Cavallaro P, Adams DH, et al. 2013. Bilateral internal mammary artery grafts, mortality and morbidity: an analysis of 1 526 360 coronary bypass operations. Heart 99:849-53.
Kurlansky PA, Traad EA, Dorman MJ, et al. 2010. Thirty-year follow-up defines survival benefit for second internal mammary artery in propensity-matched groups. Ann Thorac Surg 90:101-8.
Lemaignen A, Birgand G, Ghodhbane W, et al. 2015. Sternal wound infection after cardiac surgery: incidence and risk factors according to clinical presentation. Clin Microbiol Infect 21:674.
Loop FD, Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM, et al. 1986. Influence of the internal-mammary-artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events. N Engl J Med 314:1-6.
Lytle BW, Blackstone EH, Sabik JF, et al. 2004. The effect of bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting on survival during 20 postoperative years. Ann Thorac Surg 78:2005-14.
Mohr FW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, et al. 2013. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with three-vessel disease and left main coronary disease: 5-year follow-up of the randomized, clinical SYNTAX trial. Lancet 381:629-38.
Nicolini F, Vezzani A, Fortuna D, et al. 2016. Gender differences in outcomes following isolated coronary artery bypass grafting: long-term results. J Cardiothoracic Surg 11:144.
Raza S, Sabik JF 3rd, Masabni Ket al. 2014. Surgical revascularization techniques that minimize surgical risk and maximize late survival after coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with diabetes mellitus. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 148:1257-64.
Tabata M, Grab JD, Khalpey Z, et al. 2009. Prevalence and variability of internal mammary artery graft use in contemporary multivessel coronary artery bypass graft surgery: analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Cardiac Database. Circulation 120:935-40.
Takagi H, Goto SN, Watanabe T, et al. 2014. A meta-analysis of adjusted hazard ratios from 20 observational studies of bilateral versus single internal thoracic artery coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 148:1282-90.
Tatoulis J, Buxton BF, Fuller JA. 2011. The right internal thoracic artery: the forgotten conduit - 5,766 patients and 911 angiograms. Ann Thorac Surg 92:9-17.
Tennyson C, Lee R, Attia R. 2013. Is there a role for HbA1c in predicting mortality and morbidity outcomes after coronary artery bypass graft surgery? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 17:1000-8.
