Decision Making and Results of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Patients with Poor Left Ventricular Function


  • Ihsan Sami Uyar
  • Veysel Sahin
  • Mehmet Besir Akpinar
  • Feyzi Abacilar
  • Volkan Yurtman
  • Faik Fevzi Okur
  • Mehmet Ates
  • Talat Tavli



Background: The aim of this study is to determine the results of coronary artery bypass surgery in patients with a low ejection fraction. Between January 2007 and January 2011, 3556 consecutive patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting at the Cardiovascular Surgery Clinic at Sifa University Hospital, Izmir, Turkey, were analyzed retrospectively.

Methods: The patients were divided into 2 groups. Patients undergoing isolated first-time elective coronary bypass surgery were classified according to their preoperative ejection fraction; Patients in Group I had an ejection fraction between 20% and 35% with poor left ventricular function (n = 1246; 695 men and 551 women; mean age, 62.25 ± 5.72 years, range, 47-78 years). Control patients in Group II underwent elective coronary artery bypass grafting at the same time and had left ventricular ejection fraction between 36% and 49% (n = 2310; 1211 men and 1099 women; mean age, 61.83 ± 8.12 years, range, 41-81 years). The mean follow-up time for all patients was 24 ± 9.4 months (range, 12-48 months). Patients were followed postoperatively at the end of the first month and every 6 months. The left ventricular ejection fraction was assessed by transthoracic echocardiography.

Results: The mean number of distal anastomoses, myocardial infarction, and mean age was not significantly different between the 2 groups; however, cross-clamp time was longer in Group I. Patient recovery time was significantly longer in Group I. Morbidity (14.5% in Group I versus 7.4% in Group II, P < .005) and mortality (1.76% versus 0.30%, P < .005) were higher in Group I. During late follow-up, the 2-year survival rate (85.1% versus 94.5%) and 2-year event-free rate (77.6% versus 86.9%) were significantly lower in Group I when compared to Group II. Postoperative left ventricular ejection fraction values were significantly superior in Group I compared to Group II.

Conclusion: Coronary artery bypass grafting can be safely performed in patients with low ejection fraction with minimal postoperative morbidity and mortality. The viable myocardium could be reliably determined by positron emission tomography. Low ejection fraction patients could greatly benefit from coronary bypass surgery regarding postoperative ejection fraction, increased long-term survival, improvement in New York Heart Association classification, and higher quality of life.


Afridi I, Grayburn PA, Panza JA, Oh JK, Zoghbi WA, Marwick TH. 1998. Myocardial viability during dobutamine echocardiography predicts survival in patients with coronary artery disease and severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol 32:921-6.nAlderman EL, Fisher LD, Litwin P, et al. 1983. Results of coronary artery surgery in patients with poor left ventricular function (CASS). Circulation 68:785-95.nBoehm J, Haas F, Bauernschmitt R, et al. 2010. Impact of preoperative positron emission tomography in patients with severely impaired LV-function undergoing surgical revascularization. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 26:423-32.nChristakis GT, Weisel RD, Fremes SE, et al. 1992. Coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with poor ventricular function, Cardiovascular Surgeons of the University of Toronto. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 103:1083-91.nDi Carli MF, Maddahi J, Rokhsar S, et al. 1998. Long-term survival of patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction: implications for the role of myocardial viability assessment in management decisions. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 116:997-1004.nElefteriades JA, Kron IL. 1995. CABG in advanced left ventricular dysfunction. Cardiol Clin 13:35-42.nElefteriades JA, Zaret BL. Coronary bypass: the bad ventricle. 1998. In: Kaiser LR, Kron IL, Thomas LS, eds. Mastery of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Philadelphia-New York: Lippincot-Raven, 409-19.nEvans RW, Manninen DL, Garrison LP Jr, Maier AM. 1986. Donor availability as the primary determinant of the future of heart transplantation. JAMA 255:1892-8.nHaas F, Haehnel CJ, Picker W, et al. 1997. Preoperative positron emission tomographic viability assessment and perioperative and postoperative risk in patients with advanced ischemic heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 30:1693-700.nHausmann H, Topp H, Siniawski H, Holz S, Hetzer R. 1997. Decision-making in end-stage coronary artery disease: revascularization or heart transplantation? Ann Thorac Surg 64:1296-302.nHovnanian AL, de Matos Soeiro A, Serrano CV J, et al. 2010. Surgical myocardial revascularization of patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and severe left ventricular dysfunction. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 651:3-8.nKaul TK, Agnihotri AK, Fields BL, Riggins LS, Wyatt DA, Jones CR. 1996. Coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with an ejection fraction of twenty percent or less. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 111:1001-12.nLangenburg SE, Buchanan SA, Blackbourne LH, et al. 1995. Predicting survival after coronary revascularization for ischemic cardiomyopathy. Ann Thorac Surg 60:1193-7.nLansman SL, Cohen M, Galla JD, et al. 1993. Coronary bypass with ejection fraction of 0.20 or less using centigrade cardioplegia: long-term follow-up. Ann Thorac Surg 56:480-6.nLslamoglu F, Apaydin AZ, Posacioglu H, et al. 2002. Coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with poor left ventricular function. Jpn Heart J 43:343-56.nMarwick TH, Zuchowski C, Lauer MS, Secknus MA, Williams J, Lytle BW. 1999. Functional status and quality of life in patients with heart failure undergoing coronary bypass surgery after assessment of myocardial viability. J Am Coll Cardiol 33:750-8.nMickleborough LL, Carson S, Tamariz M, Ivanov J. 2000. Results of revascularization in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 119:550-7.nMickleborough LL, Maruyama H, Takagi Y, Mohamed S, Sun Z, Ebisuzaki L. 1995. Results of revascularization in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction. Circulation 92:II73-9.nPigott JD, Kouchoukos NT, Oberman A, Cutter GR. 1985. Late results of surgical medical therapy for patients with coronary artery disease and depressed left ventricular function. J Am Coll Cardiol 5:1036-45.nScott SM, Deupree HL, Sharma GV, Luchi RJ. 1994. VA study of unstable angina: 10-year results show duration of surgical advantage for patients with impaired ejection fraction. Circulation 90:II120-3.nSelim Isbir C, Yildirim T, Akgun S, et al. 2003. Coronary artery bypass surgery in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction. Int J Cardiol 90:309-16.nShapira I, Isakov A, Yakirevich V, Topilsky M. 1995. Long-term results of coronary artery bypass surgery in patients with severely depressed left ventricular dysfunction. Chest 108:1546-50.nTavli T, Ammar A, Tavli V, Wong M. 1992. B-color echocardiography: does color transformation improve detection of endocardium? Medical Journal of Ege University 2:81-3.nTopkara VK, Cheema FH, Kesavaramanujam S, et al. 2005. Coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with low ejection fraction. Circulation 112:I344-50.n



How to Cite

Uyar, I. S., Sahin, V., Akpinar, M. B., Abacilar, F., Yurtman, V., Okur, F. F., Ates, M., & Tavli, T. (2013). Decision Making and Results of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Patients with Poor Left Ventricular Function. The Heart Surgery Forum, 16(3), E118-E124.