Immunohistochemical Analysis of the Spinal Cord Ischemia– Effect of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in a Porcine Model

Authors

  • Henri Johannes Haapanen Research Unit of Surgery, Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Oulu and Medical Research Center, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
  • Johanna Herajärvi Research Unit of Surgery, Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Oulu and Medical Research Center, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
  • Hannu-Pekka Honkanen Research Unit of Surgery, Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Oulu and Medical Research Center, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
  • Caius Mustonen Research Unit of Surgery, Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Oulu and Medical Research Center, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
  • Hannu Tuominen Pathology, Medical Research Center, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
  • Ulla Puistola Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical Research Center, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
  • Vesa Anttila Research Unit of Surgery, Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Oulu and Medical Research Center, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
  • Tatu Juvonen Research Unit of Surgery, Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Oulu and Medical Research Center, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1532/hsf.1969

Keywords:

spinal cord ischemia, remote ischemic preconditioning

Abstract

Background: In experimental settings, remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) has shown a positive effect regarding spinal cord protection after local ischemia. In this study, we conducted spinal cord immunohistochemistry to demonstrate the protective effect of RIPC after 24 hours of the regional ischemia. 

Methods: Twenty piglets were randomized into an RIPC group (n = 10) and a control group (n = 10). The RIPC group underwent transient left hind limb ischemia before systematic left subclavian artery and segmental artery occlusion at the level of the diaphragm. Twenty-four hours later, the thoracic and lumbar spinal cords were harvested, and the oxidative stress markers were immunohistochemically analysed. 

Results: A total of 18 animals survived the 4-hour follow up (10 in the RIPC group, 8 in the control group) and 14 animals survived the 24-hour follow up (7 in each group). In the single sections of the spinal cord, the antioxidant pathway activation was seen in the RIPC group, as OGG1 and DJ-1/PARK7 activation was higher (P = .038 and
P = .047, respectively). 

Conclusions: The results indicate that the neuroprotective effect of RIPC on the spinal cord after local ischemic insult remains controversial.

References

Abedin Z, Louis-Juste M, Stangl M, et al. 2013. The role of base excision repair genes OGG1, APN1 and APN2 in benzo[a]pyrene-7,8-dione induced p53 mutagenesis. Mutat Res. 750:121-8.

Aleyasin H, Rousseaux MW, Phillips M, et al. 2007. The Parkinson’s disease gene DJ-1 is also a key regulator of stroke-induced damage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:18748-53.

Anttila V, Haapanen H, Yannopoulos F, et al. 2016. Review of remote ischemic preconditioning: from laboratory studies to clinical trials. Scand Cardiovasc J 50:355-61.

Arvola O, Haapanen H, Herajarvi J, et al. 2016. Remote ischemic preconditioning reduces cerebral oxidative stress following hypothermic circulatory arrest in a porcine model. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 28:92-102.

Clements CM, McNally RS, Conti BJ, et al. 2006. DJ-1, a cancer- and Parkinson’s disease-associated protein, stabilizes the antioxidant transcriptional master regulator Nrf2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:15091-6.

Coselli JS, LeMaire SA, Preventza O, et al. 2016. Outcomes of 3309 thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repairs. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 151:1323-37.

Haapanen H, Herajarvi J, Arvola O, et al. 2016. Remote ischemic preconditioning protects the spinal cord against ischemic insult: An experimental study in a porcine model. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 151:777-85.

Hausenloy DJ, Candilio L, Evans R, et al. 2015. Remote ischemic preconditioning and outcomes of cardiac surgery. N Engl J Med 373:1408-17.

Herajarvi J, Anttila T, Sarja H, et al. 2017. Exploring spinal cord protection by remote ischemic preconditioning: an experimental study. Ann Thorac Surg 103:804-11.

Li W, Luo Y, Zhang F, et al. 2006. Ischemic preconditioning in the rat brain enhances the repair of endogenous oxidative DNA damage by activating the base-excision repair pathway. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 26:181-98.

Liu D, Croteau DL, Souza-Pinto N, et al. 2011. Evidence that OGG1 glycosylase protects neurons against oxidative DNA damage and cell death under ischemic conditions. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 31:680-92.

MacAllister R, Clayton T, Knight R, et al. 2015. REmote preconditioning for Protection Against Ischaemia–Reperfusion in renal transplantation (REPAIR): a multicentre, multinational, double-blind, factorial designed randomised controlled trial. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library. Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation.

Meybohm P, Bein B, Brosteanu O, et al. 2015. A multicenter trial of remote ischemic preconditioning for heart surgery. N Engl J Med 373:1397-1407.

Mitsuishi Y, Motohashi H, Yamamoto M. 2012. The Keap1-Nrf2 system in cancers: stress response and anabolic metabolism. Front Oncol 2:200.

Mitsumoto A, Nakagawa Y. 2001. DJ-1 is an indicator for endogenous reactive oxygen species elicited by endotoxin. Free Radic Res 35:885-93.

Oka S, Ohno M, Tsuchimoto D, et al. 2008. Two distinct pathways of cell death triggered by oxidative damage to nuclear and mitochondrial DNAs. EMBO J 27:421-32.

Robertson FP, Goswami R, Wright GP, et al. 2017. Remote ischaemic preconditioning in orthotopic liver transplantation (RIPCOLT trial): a pilot randomized controlled feasibility study. HPB (Oxford) 19:757-67.

Svensson LG, Crawford ES, Hess KR, et al. 1993. Experience with 1509 patients undergoing thoracoabdominal aortic operations. J Vasc Surg 17:357-68; discussion 368.

Tanaka Y, Kawaguchi M, Noguchi Y, et al. 2016. Systematic review of motor evoked potentials monitoring during thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm open repair surgery: a diagnostic meta-analysis. J Anesth 30:1037-50.

Thielmann M, Kottenberg E, Kleinbongard P, et al. 2013. Cardioprotective and prognostic effects of remote ischaemic preconditioning in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: a single-centre randomised, double-blind, controlled trial. Lancet 382:597-604.

Valavanidis A, Vlachogianni T, Fiotakis C. 2009. 8-hydroxy-2’ -deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG): A critical biomarker of oxidative stress and carcinogenesis. J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev 27:120-39.

Zhan RZ, Wu C, Fujihara H, et al. 2001. Both caspase-dependent and caspase-independent pathways may be involved in hippocampal CA1 neuronal death because of loss of cytochrome c from mitochondria in a rat forebrain ischemia model. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 21:529-40.

Published

2018-05-29

How to Cite

Haapanen, H. J., Herajärvi, J., Honkanen, H.-P., Mustonen, C., Tuominen, H., Puistola, U., Anttila, V., & Juvonen, T. (2018). Immunohistochemical Analysis of the Spinal Cord Ischemia– Effect of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in a Porcine Model. The Heart Surgery Forum, 21(3), E209-E214. https://doi.org/10.1532/hsf.1969

Issue

Section

Article