Control of Acute Postoperative Pain by Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation after Open Cardiac Operations: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Prospective Study

Authors

  • Mustafa Emmiler
  • Özlem Solak
  • Cevdet Kocogullari
  • Umit Dundar
  • Ercument Ayva
  • Yuksel Ela
  • Ahmet Cekirdekci
  • Vural Kavuncu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1532/HSF98.20081083

Abstract

Objective: We investigated the effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) therapy on pain during the first 24 hours after a cardiac surgical procedure.

Methods: A total of 60 patients who had undergone median sternotomy (MS) for coronary artery bypass graft (n = 55) or valve repair surgery (n = 5) were randomized to receive TENS and pharmacologic analgesia, placebo TENS and pharmacologic analgesia, or pharmacologic analgesia alone (control group). For each group we recorded severity of pain, analgesic intake, and pulmonary complications. Pethidine HCL and metamizol sodium were administered for postsurgical analgesia.

Results: Pain after MS was measured on a 10-point visual analogue scale (VAS). Mean scores in the TENS, placebo TENS, and control groups, respectively, were 5.70 ± 1.78, 5.75 ± 1.83, and 5.95 ± 1.63 before treatment (P >.05); 2.40 ± 1.18, 3.90 ± 1.48, and 3.55 ± 1.60 on the 12th hour of the intervention (P < .05); and 1.25 ± 0.91, 2.30 ± 1.34, and 2.15 ± 1.13 on the 24th hour of the intervention (P < .05). The mean VAS scores decreased within each group (P < .05). However, the mean VAS scores decreased much more significantly in the TENS group (P < .05). Metamizol sodium intake was 1.05 ± 0.39 g, 2.30 ± 1.08 g, and 2.90 ± 1.20 g and pethidine HCL intake was 17 ± 16.25 mg, 57 ± 21.54 mg, and 51.50 ± 18.99 mg, respectively, in the TENS, placebo TENS, and control groups. Metamizol sodium and pethidine HCL intake was least in the TENS group (P < .05). Postoperative complications were observed in 6 (10%) of patients. The most frequent complication was atelectasia.

Conclusions: TENS was more effective than placebo TENS or control treatments in decreasing pain and limiting opioid and nonopioid medication intake during the first 24-hour period following MS.

References

Chulay M, Brown J, Summer W. 1982. Effect of postoperative immobilization after coronary artery bypass surgery. Crit Care Med10(3):176-9.nDahl JB, Kehlet H. 1991. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: rationale for use in severe postoperative pain. Br J Anaesth66:703-12.nDellemijin P. 1999. Are opioids effective in relieving neuropathic pain? Pain80:453-62.nDonald I. 1976. At the receiving end: a doctor's personal recollections of second-time cardiac valve replacement. Scott Med J21(2):49-57.nFitzpatrick GJ, Moriarty DC. 1988. Intrathecal morphine in the management of pain following cardiac surgery: a comparison with morphine i.v. Br J Anaesth60(6):639-44.nForster EL, Kramer JF, Lucy SD, Scudds RA, Novick RJ. 1994. Effect of TENS on pain, medications, and pulmonary function following coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Chest106(5):1343-8.nHamza AM, White PF, Ahmed HE, Ghoname EA. 1999. Effect of the frequency of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on the postoperative opioid analgesic requirement and recovery profile. Anesthesiology91(5):1232-38.nJansen KJ, McFadden PM. 1986. Postoperative nursing management in patients undergoing myocardial revascularization with the internal mammary artery bypass. Heart Lung15(1):48-54.nJenkins SC, Soutar SA, Forsyth A, Keates JR, Moxham J. 1989. Lung function after coronary artery surgery using the internal mammary artery and the saphenous vein. Thorax44(3):209-11.nKlin B, Uretzky G, Magora F. 1984. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) after open heart surgery. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino)25(5):445-8.nNavarathnam RG, Wang IY, Thomas D, Klineberg PL. 1984. Evaluation of the transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator for postoperative analgesia following cardiac surgery. Anaesth Intensive Care12(4):345-50.nRichardson J, Sabanathan S, Mearns AJ, Sides C, Goulden CP. 1994. Post-thoracotomy neuralgia. Pain Clinic7:87-97.nRichardson J, Sabanathan S, Mearns AJ, Shah RD, Goulden C. 1995. A prospective, randomized comparison of interpleural and paravertebral analgesia in thoracic surgery. Br J Anaesth7:12-8.nSolak O, Turna A, Pekcolaklar A, Metin M, Sayar A, Solak Ö. 2007. Transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation for the treatment of postthoracotomy pain: a randomized prospective study. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg55(3):182-5.nBayindir O, Paker T, Akpinar B, Erenturk S, Askin D, Aytac A. 1991. Use of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in the control of postoperative chest pain after cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth5(6):589-91.nBrown DV, Lubenow TR. 1998. Management of post-thoracotomy pain. 1998. In: Franco KL, Putnam JB, editors. Advanced therapy in thoracic surgery. Hamilton: B. C. Decker. p. 13-23.nChapman CR, Syrjala KL. 2001. Measurement of pain. In: Loesser JD, editor. Bonica's management of pain. 3th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. p. 310-8.n

Published

2008-10-22

How to Cite

Emmiler, M., Solak, Özlem, Kocogullari, C., Dundar, U., Ayva, E., Ela, Y., Cekirdekci, A., & Kavuncu, V. (2008). Control of Acute Postoperative Pain by Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation after Open Cardiac Operations: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Prospective Study. The Heart Surgery Forum, 11(5), E300-E303. https://doi.org/10.1532/HSF98.20081083

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)