The Improvement of Torsion Assessed by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Sensitive Index of Cardiac Function


  • Nan Cheng Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing
  • Liuquan Cheng Department of Radiology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing
  • Rong Wang Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing
  • Lin Zhang Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing
  • Changqing Gao Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing



Objective: The aim of this study was to quantify left ventricular torsion by newly applied cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking (CMR-FT), and to evaluate the clinical value of the ventricular torsion as a sensitive indicator of cardiac function by comparison of preoperative and postoperative torsion.

Methods: A total of 54 volunteers and 36 patients with previous myocardial infarction (MI) and LV ejection fraction (EF) between 30%-50% were screened preoperatively or postoperatively by MRI. The patients’ short axis views of the whole heart were acquired, and all patients had a scar area >75% in at least one of the anterior or inferior segments. Their apical and basal rotation values were analyzed by feature tracking, and the correlation analysis was performed for the improvement of LV torsion and ejection fraction after CABG. The intra- and inter-observer reliabilities of torsion measured by CMR-FT were assessed.

Results: In normal hearts, the apex rotated counterclockwise in the systolic period with the peak rotation as 10.2 ± 4.8°, and the base rotated clockwise as the peak value was 7.0 ± 3.3°. There was a timing hiatus between the apex and base untwisting, during which period the heart recoils and its suction sets the stage for the following rapid filling period. The postoperative torsion and rotation significantly improved compared with preoperative ones. However, the traditional indicator of cardiac function, ejection fraction, didn’t show significant improvement.

Conclusion: Left ventricular torsion derived from CMR-FT, which does not require specialized CMR sequences, was sensitive to patients with low ejection fraction whose cardiac function significantly improved after CABG. The rapid acquisition of this measurement has potential for the assessment of cardiac function in clinical practice. 


Buckberg G, Hoffman JI, Nanda NC, Coghlan C, Saleh S, Athanasuleas C. 2011. Ventricular torsion and untwisting: further insights into mechanics and timing interdependence: a viewpoint. Echocardiography 28:782-804.

Castillo E, Osman NF, Rosen BD, et al. 2005. Quantitative assessment of regional myocardial function with MR-tagging in a multi-center study: interobserver and intraobserver agreement of fast strain analysis with Harmonic Phase (HARP) MRI. J Cardiovasc Magnetic Res 7:783-91.

Esch BT, Warburton DE. 2009. Left ventricular torsion and recoil: implications for exercise performance and cardiovascular disease. J Applied Physiol 106:362-9.

Goffinet C, Chenot F, Robert A, et al. 2009. Assessment of subendocardial vs. subepicardial left ventricular rotation and twist using two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography: comparison with tagged cardiac magnetic resonance. Eur Heart J 30:608-17.

Hansen DE, Daughters GT 2nd, Alderman EL, Ingels NB Jr, Miller DC. 1988. Torsional deformation of the left ventricular midwall in human hearts with intramyocardial markers: regional heterogeneity and sensitivity to the inotropic effects of abrupt rate changes. Circulation Res 62:941-52.

Hor KN, Gottliebson WM, Carson C, et al. 2010. Comparison of magnetic resonance feature tracking for strain calculation with harmonic phase imaging analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 3:144-51.

Hor KN, Baumann R, Pedrizzetti G, et al. 2011. Magnetic resonance derived myocardial strain assessment using feature tracking. JoVE 48:2356.

Hovnanian AL, Matos Soeiro A, Serrano CV, et al. 2010. Surgical myocardial revascularization of patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and severe left ventricular disfunction. Clinics 65:3-8.

Hristov N, Liakopoulos OJ, Buckberg GD, Trummer G. 2006. Septal structure and function relationships parallel the left ventricular free wall ascending and descending segments of the helical heart. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 29 Suppl 1:S115-25.

Ingels NB Jr. 1997. Myocardial fiber architecture and left ventricular function. Technol Health Care 5:45-52.

Knudtson ML, Galbraith PD, Hildebrand KL, Tyberg JV, Beyar R. 1997. Dynamics of left ventricular apex rotation during angioplasty: a sensitive index of ischemic dysfunction. Circulation 96:801-8.

Kowallick JT, Lamata P, Hussain ST, et al. 2014. Quantification of left ventricular torsion and diastolic recoil using cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking. PloS One 9:e109164.

Lower R. Tractus de Corde. 1968. In: Early Science in Oxford, Vol 9, RT Gunther, ed. Reprint, Oxford, UK, Sawsons, PallMall, London. p. 1669.

Matsumoto K, Tanaka H, Tatsumi K, et al. 2012. Left ventricular dyssynchrony using three-dimensional speckle-tracking imaging as a determinant of torsional mechanics in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 109:1197-205.

Meyer CG, Frick M, Lotfi S, et al. 2014. Regional left ventricular function after transapical vs. transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation analysed by cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 15:1168-76.

Morton G, Schuster A, Jogiya R, Kutty S, Beerbaum P, Nagel E. 2012. Inter-study reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking. J Cardiovasc Magnetic Res 14:43.

Orwat S, Kempny A, Diller GP, et al. 2014. Cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking- a novel method to assess myocardial strain: Comparison with echocardiographic speckle tracking in healthy volunteers and in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy. Kardiologia Polska 72:363-71.

Pravdin SF, Berdyshev VI, Panfilov AV, Katsnelson LB, Solovyova O, Markhasin VS. 2013. Mathematical model of the anatomy and fibre orientation field of the left ventricle of the heart. Biomed Engineering Online 12:54.

Rademakers FE, Buchalter MB, Rogers WJ, et al. 1992. Dissociation between left ventricular untwisting and filling. Accentuation by catecholamines. Circulation 85:1572-81.

Sengupta PP, Korinek J, Belohlavek M, et al. 2006. Left ventricular structure and function: basic science for cardiac imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 48:1988-2001.

Shapira I, Isakov A, Yakirevich V, Topilsky M. 1995. Long-term results of coronary artery bypass surgery in patients with severely depressed left ventricular function. Chest 108: 1546-50.

Streeter DD Jr, Spotnitz HM, Patel DP, Ross J Jr, Sonnenblick EH. 1969. Fiber orientation in the canine left ventricle during diastole and systole. Circulation Research 24:339-47.

Torrent-Guasp F, Buckberg GD, Clemente C, et al. 2001. The structure and function of the helical heart and its buttress wrapping. I. The normal macroscopic structure of the heart. Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. 13:301-19.

Wu L, Germans T, Guclu A, Heymans MW, Allaart CP, van Rossum AC. 2014. Feature tracking compared with tissue tagging measurements of segmental strain by



How to Cite

Cheng, N., Cheng, L., Wang, R., Zhang, L., & Gao, C. (2017). The Improvement of Torsion Assessed by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Sensitive Index of Cardiac Function. The Heart Surgery Forum, 20(1), E026-E031.




Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>