Emergency Management for Critical Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis

Authors

  • Onur Sokullu
  • Numan Ali Aydemir
  • Erol Kurc
  • Batuhan Ozay
  • Fuat Bilgen
  • Murat Demirtas
  • Serap Aykut Aka

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1532/HSF98.20101057

Abstract

Background: Increased experience and improvements in technology seem to have encouraged the use of percutaneous interventions for left main coronary artery (LMCA) occlusions. There is no consensus, however, and the data are inadequate on whether surgery or percutaneous procedures should be the intervention of choice for critical occlusions.

Methods: From January 2002 to December 2006, 108 patients with unprotected LMCA stenosis >80% were treated at our center. Eighty-three patients (77%) underwent bypass grafting and 20 (18%) underwent percutaneous intervention for the purpose of myocardial revascularization. We analyzed parameters demonstrated as risk factors for myocardial revascularization and their predicted effects on outcome.

Results: Five patients (5%) died following emergency cardiopulmonary resuscitation before any intervention was performed. The early survival rate was 84.1% in the coronary bypass group and 63% in the percutaneous intervention group. The mean (±SD) survival time was 55.7 ± 2.6 months in the bypass group and 7.6 ± 1.3 months in the percutaneous group. The late-survival rate was also significantly higher in the bypass group. The mean late-survival time was 44.5 ± 3.6 months in the bypass group and 2.3 ± 0.8 months in the percutaneous group.

Conclusion: Although emergency percutaneous interventions are lifesaving in some cases, these results clearly demonstrate that coronary bypass grafting should be the intervention of choice for myocardial revascularization in patients with critical LMCA occlusion.

References

Brueren BR, Ernst JM, Suttorp MJ, et al. 2004. Emergency percutaneous coronary interventions for unprotected left main stenoses: immediate and long term follow up. Heart 90:1067-8.nBrunner-La Rocca HP, Kaiser C, et al. 2007. Cost-effectiveness of drug-eluting stents in patients at high or low risk of major cardiac events in the Basel Stent KostenEffektivitäts Trial (BASKET): an 18-month analysis. Lancet 370:1552-9.nCharitos CE, Nanas JN, Tsoukas A, Anastasiou-Nana M, Lolas CT. 1997. Total occlusion of the left main coronary artery with preserved left ventricular function. Int J Cardiol 61:193-6.nChieffo A, Stankovic G, Bonizzoni E, et al. 2005. Early and mid-term results of drug-eluting stent implantation in unprotected left main. Circulation 111:791-5.nDzavik V, Ghali WA, Norris C, et al. 2001. Long-term survival in 11,661 patients with multivessel coronary artery disease in the era of stenting: a report from the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease (APPROACH) Investigators. Am Heart J 142:119-26.nEdwards FH, Clark RE, Schwatz M. 1994. Coronary artery bypass grafting: the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database experience. Ann Thorac Surg 57:12-9.nHsu RB, Chien CY, Wang SS, Chu SH. 2000. Surgical revascularization for acute total occlusion of left main coronary artery. Tex Heart Inst J 27:299-301.nJavaid A, Steinberg DH, Buch AN, et al. 2007. Outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. Circulation 116(suppl):I200-6.nLee MS, Kapoor N, Jamal F, et al. 2006. Comparison of coronary artery bypass surgery with percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents for unprotected left main coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:864-70.nPark DW, Yun SC, Lee SW, et al. 2008. Long-term mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent implantation versus coronary artery bypass surgery for the treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease. Circulation 117:2079-86.nPuskas JD, Kilgo PD, Lattouf OM, et al. 2008. Off-pump coronary bypass provides reduced mortality and morbidity and equivalent 10-year survival. Ann Thorac Surg 86:1139-46.nSerruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, et al. 2009. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 360:961-72.nShimizu T, Ohno T, Ando J, et al. 2010. Mid-term results and costs of coronary artery bypass vs drug-eluting stents for unprotected left main coronary artery disease. Circ J 74:449-55.nSmith SC Jr, Dove JT, Jacobs AK, et al. 2001. ACC/AHA guidelines of percutaneous coronary interventions (revision of the 1993 PTCA guidelines)—executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (committee to revise the 1993 guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty). J Am Coll Cardiol 37:2215-39.nSpiecker M, Erbel R, Rupprecht HJ, Meyer J. 1994. Emergency angioplasty of totally occluded left main coronary artery in acute myocardial infarction and unstable angina pectoris—institutional experience and literature review. Eur Heart J 15:602-7.nStroupe KT, Morrison DA, Hlatky MA, et al. 2006. Cost-effectiveness of coronary artery bypass grafts versus percutaneous coronary intervention for revascularization of high-risk patients. Circulation 114:1251-7.nSvedjeholm R, Franson SG, Granfeldt H, Olin C. 2001. Heart rescue in acute left main coronary artery occlusion with CABG using initial retrograde perfusion. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 49:331-3.nTakagi T, Stankovic G, Finci L, et al. 2002. Results and long-term predictors of adverse clinical events after elective percutaneous interventions on unprotected left main coronary artery. Circulation 106:698-702.nTan WA, Tamai H, Park SJ, et al. 2001. Long-term clinical outcomes after unprotected left main trunk percutaneous revascularization in 279 patients. Circulation 104:1609-14.nTopaz O, Disciascio G, Cowley MJ, et al. 1991. Complete left main coronary artery occlusion: angiographic evaluation of collateral vessel patterns and assessment of hemodynamic correlates. Am Heart J 121:450-56.nValle M, Virtanen K, Hekali P, Frick MH. 1979. Survival with total occlusion of the left main coronary artery. Significance of the collateral circulation. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 5:269-75.nYip HK, Wu CJ, Chen MC, et al. 2001. Effect of primary angioplasty on total or subtotal left main occlusion: analysis of incidence, clinical features, outcomes, and prognostic determinants. Chest 120:1212-7.nZimmern SH, Rogers WJ, Bream PR, et al. 1982. Total occlusion of the left main coronary artery: the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) experience. Am J Cardiol 49:2003-10.n

Published

2011-02-23

How to Cite

Sokullu, O., Aydemir, N. A., Kurc, E., Ozay, B., Bilgen, F., Demirtas, M., & Aka, S. A. (2011). Emergency Management for Critical Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis. The Heart Surgery Forum, 14(1), E12-E17. https://doi.org/10.1532/HSF98.20101057

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>