Challenges Associated with the Integration of Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in a Community Hospital

Authors

  • Daniel R. Watson
  • Thomas Tan
  • Lori Wiseman
  • Gary M. Ansel
  • Chip Botti
  • Barry George
  • Richard Snow

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1532/HSF98.20041092

Abstract

Purpose: There has been considerable debate regarding the proper place for endovascular repair (ER) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) versus traditional open repair (OR). Our study compared preoperative patient demographics and outcomes for elective, asymptomatic AAA repairs performed at our center over a 33-month period.

Methods: For this study, we selected 342 consecutive elective infrarenal AAA repairs performed between July 1, 2000, and March 31, 2003, at Riverside Methodist Hospital. The patients underwent either ER or OR, depending on patient and surgeon collaborative determinations. Ruptured and symptomatic AAAs were excluded from our study. Preoperative demographics, anesthesia, complications, and discharge status for the 2 groups were analyzed, and statistical analysis was done to determine statistically significant differences.

Results: The preoperative status of the ER and OR patient groups were essentially similar. There were only 3 significant differences between the 2 groups: alcohol use was higher for the OR group than for the ER group (12.0% versus 5.2%; P = .04), and the incidence of type II diabetes mellitus and peripheral vascular disease were lower for the OR group compared with the ER group (6.7% versus 13.4% [P = .04] and 18.3% versus 30.6% [P = .008], respectively). The OR group used more general anesthesia than the ER group (99% versus 86%; P < .001) and had more complications, including dysrhythmia (8.65% versus 1.59%; P = .005), ileus (13.94% versus 0.79%; P < .0001), infection (8.17% versus 0.0%; P = .0007), respiratory complications (12.50% versus 1.59%; P = .0003), and renal complications (5.29% versus 0.79%; P = .032). The ER group had a higher rate of wound hematoma (4.76% versus 0.48%; P = .007). ER patients also

References

Aquino RV, Jones MA, Zullo TG, Missig-Carroll N, Makaroun MS. 2001. Quality of life assessment in patients undergoing endovascular or conventional AAA repair. J Endovasc Ther 8:521-8.nBaum RA, Carpenter JP, Constantin C, et al. 2001. Aneurysm sac pressure measurements after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 33:32-41.nBecker GJ, Kovacs M, Mathison MN, et al. 2001. Risk stratification and outcomes of transluminal endografting for abdominal aortic aneurysm: 7-year experience and long-term follow-up. J Vasc Interv Radiol 12:1033-46.nBush RL, Lumsden AB, Dodson TF, et al. 2001. Mid-term results after endovascular repair of the abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg 33:S70-6.nCarpenter JP, Neschis DG, Fairman RM, et al. 2001. Failure of endovascular abdominal aortic graft limbs. J Vasc Surg 33:296-303.nCollin J, Murie JA. 2001. Endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a failed experiment. Br J Surg 88:1281-2.nDjokovic JL, Hedley-Whyte J. 1979. Prediction of outcome of surgery and anesthesia in patients over 80. JAMA 242:2301-6.nDorffner R, Thurnher S, Polterauer P, Kretschmer G, Lammer J. 1997. Treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms with transfemoral placement of stent-grafts: complications and secondary intervention. Radiology 204:79-86.nDrott C, Arfvidsson B, Ortenwall P, Lundholm K. 1992. Age-standardized incidence of ruptured aortic aneurysm in a defined Swedish population between 1952 and 1988: mortality rate and operative results. Br J Surg 79:175-9.nErnst CB. 1993. Abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med 328:1167-72.nFeigal DW. 2001. Problems with endovascular grafts for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). J Vasc Surg 33:1361-2.nHarris PL, Vallabhaneni SR, Desgranges P, Becquemin JP, van Marrewijk C, Laheij RJF, for the EUROSTAR collaborators. 2000. Incidence and risk factors of late rupture, conversion, and death after endovascular repair of infrarenal aortic aneurysms: the EUROSTAR experience. J Vasc Surg 32:739-49.nIngoldby CJH, Wujanto R, Mitchell JE. 1986. Impact of vascular surgery on community mortality from ruptured aortic aneurysms. Br J Surg 73:551-3.nJohnston KW. 1989. Multicenter prospective study of nonruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm, part II: variables predicting morbidity and mortality. J Vasc Surg 9:437-47.nLigush J Jr, Pearce J, Edwards MS, et al. 2002. Analysis of medical risk factors and outcomes in patients undergoing open versus endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 36:492-9.nMay J, White GH, Yu W, et al. 1998. Concurrent comparison of endoluminal versus open repair in the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms: analysis of 303 patients by life table method. J Vasc Surg 27:213-21.nOhki T, Veith FJ, Shaw P, et al. 2001. Increasing incidence of midterm and long-term complications after endovascular graft repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a note of caution based on a 9-year experience. Ann Surg 234:323-34.nPilcher DB, Davis JH, Ashikaga T, et al. 1980. Treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm in an entire state over 7 1/2 years. Am J Surg 139:487-94.nPolitz JK, Newman VS, Stewart MT. 2000. Late abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture after AneuRx repair: a report of three cases. J Vasc Surg 31:599-606.nRutledge R, Oller DW, Meyer AA, Johnson GJ. 1996. A statewide, population-based, time-series analysis of the outcome of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Ann Surg 223:492-505.nSalartash K, Sternbergh WC, York JW, Money SR. 2001. Comparison of open transabdominal AAA repair with endovascular AAA in reduction of postoperative stress response. Ann Vasc Surg 15:53-9.nSapirstein W, Chandeysson P, Wentz C. 2001. The Food and Drug Administration approval of endovascular grafts for abdominal aortic aneurysm: an 18-month retrospective. J Vasc Surg 34:180-3.nSullivan CA, Rohrer MJ, Cutler BS. 1990. Clinical management of symptomatic but unruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg 11:799-803.nThomas PRS, Stewart RD. 1988. Abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg 75:733-6.nZarins CK, White RA, Moll FL, et al. 2001. The AneuRx stent graft: four-year results and worldwide experience 2000. J Vasc Surg 33:S135-45.nZarins CK, White RA, Schwarten D, et al. 1999. AneuRx stent graft versus open aneurysms: multicenter trial. J Vasc Surg 29:292-308.n

Published

2005-05-31

How to Cite

Watson, D. R., Tan, T., Wiseman, L., Ansel, G. M., Botti, C., George, B., & Snow, R. (2005). Challenges Associated with the Integration of Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in a Community Hospital. The Heart Surgery Forum, 7(5), E508-E514. https://doi.org/10.1532/HSF98.20041092

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)