Randomized Trial Comparing Off-Pump to On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in High-Risk Patients

Authors

  • Michel Carrier
  • Louis P. Perrault
  • Hugues Jeanmart
  • Raymond Martineau
  • Raymond Cartier
  • Pierre Pagé

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1532/hsf.1094

Abstract

Objective: The subset of patients most likely to benefit from off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains a controversial issue, but the technique has been proposed to decrease postoperative mortality and morbidity. The objective of this study was to compare off-pump to on-pump CABG in patients with known risk factors for mortality and morbidity.

Methods: Between October 2001 and September 2002, 65 high-risk patients were prospectively randomized to undergo off-pump or on-pump CABG. Recruited patients had at least 3 of the following criteria: age greater than 65 years, high blood pressure, diabetes, serum creatinine greater than 133 3mol/L, left ventricular ejection fraction lower than 45%, chronic pulmonary disease, unstable angina, congestive heart failure, repeat CABG, anemia, and carotid atherosclerosis. Hospital mortality and morbidity were the primary end-points of the study.

Results: Six patients (9%) crossed over from the original randomized group. Twenty-eight patients averaging 70 ± 8 years of age underwent 3 ± 1 grafts off pump, and 37 patients averaging 70 ± 6 years of age underwent 3.4 ± 1 grafts on pump. Revascularization was considered complete in 21 (75%) of off-pump patients compared to 33 (89%) of on-pump patients (P = .1). There were no hospital deaths in off-pump patients, and 2 patients (5%) undergoing on-pump CABG died early following surgery (P = .2). Two off-pump (7%) compared to 11 on-pump (30%) of patients presented composite end-points including death, neurological injury, renal failure, respiratory failure, and operative myocardial infarction after CABG (P = .02).

Conclusion: The present study suggests that off-pump CABG, when technically feasible, significantly reduces morbidity following surgery in a group of high-risk patients.

References

Al-Ruzzeh S, Nakamura K, Athanasiou T, et al. 2003. Does off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery improve the outcome in high-risk patients? A comparative study of 1398 high-risk patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 23:50-5.nArom KV, Flavin TF, Emery RW, et al. 2000. Safety and efficacy of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 69:704-10.nBonchek LI. 2002. Off-pump coronary bypass: Is it for everyone? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 124:431-4.nHoff SJ, Ball SK, Coltharp WH, et al. 2002. Coronary artery bypass in patients 80 years and over: is off-pump the operation of choice? Ann Thorac Surg 74:S1340-3.nMack MJ, Duhaylongsod FG. 2002. Through the open door! Where has the ride taken us? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 124:655-9.nMeharwal ZS, Mishra YK, Kohli V, et al. 2002. Off-pump multivessel coronary artery surgery in high-risk patients. Ann Thorac Surg 74:S1353-7.nNathoe HM, Diederik VD, Jansen EW, et al. 2003. A comparison of on-pump and off-pump coronary bypass surgery in low-risk patients. N Engl J Med 348:394-402.nPerrault LP, Nickner C, Desjardins N, et al. 2000. Effects of coronary endothelial function of the Cohn stabilizer for beating heart bypass operations. Ann Thorac Surg 70:1111-4.nSabik JF, Gillinov AM, Blackstone EH, et al. 2002. Does off-pump coronary surgery reduce morbidity and mortality? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 124:698-707.nVan Dijk D, Nierich AP, Jansen EW, et al. 2001. Early outcomes after off-pump versus on-pump coronary bypass surgery: results from a randomized study. Circulation 104:1761-6.nWong BI, McLean RF, Fremes SE, et al. 2000. Aprotinin and tranexamic acid for high transfusion risk in cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 69:808-16.nYacoub M. 2001. Off-pump coronary bypass surgery. In search of an identity. Circulation 104:1743-5.nBoyd WD, Desai ND, Del Rizzo DF, et al. 1999. Off-pump surgery decreases postoperative complications and resource utilization in the elderly. Ann Thorac Surg 68:1490-3.nCarrier M, Pellerin M, Perrault LP, et al. 2002. Cardioplegic arrest with L-arginine improves myocardial protection: results of a prospective randomized clinical trial. Ann Thorac Surg 73:837-42.nCartier R. 1999. Systematic off-pump coronary artery revascularization: experience of 275 cases. Ann Thorac Surg 68:1494-7.nCheng W, Denton TA, Fontana GP, et al. 2002. Off-pump coronary surgery: effect on early mortality and stroke. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 124:313-20.nDagenais F, Perrault LP, Cartier R, et al. 1999. Beating heart coronary artery bypass grafting: technical aspects and results in 200 patients. Can J Cardiol 15:867-72.nDemaria RG, Carrier M, Fortier S, et al. 2002. Reduced mortality and strokes with off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting surgery in octagenarians. Circulation 106:I5-I10.n

Published

2005-02-07

How to Cite

Carrier, M., Perrault, L. P., Jeanmart, H., Martineau, R., Cartier, R., & Pagé, P. (2005). Randomized Trial Comparing Off-Pump to On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in High-Risk Patients. The Heart Surgery Forum, 6(6), E89-E92. https://doi.org/10.1532/hsf.1094

Issue

Section

Articles