Skeletonized Gastroepiploic Artery for Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

  • Ruzheng Li
  • Atsushi Amano
  • Hiroyuki Miyagawa
  • Shizuyuki Dohi
  • Ichirou Hayashi
  • Kan Kajimoto
  • Akie Shimada
  • Hitoshi Hirose

Abstract

Background: Skeletonized arterial grafting may reduce the risk of graft spasm and may improve graft patency. Previously we reported a pilot study of skeletonized gastroepiploic artery (GEA) grafting with favorable results. Skeletonized GEA harvesting with an ultrasonic scalpel has now become our routine procedure. In this report, we compare the early clinical outcomes of skeletonized versus pedicled GEA grafting to assess the safety and benefit of use of skeletonized GEA in coronary artery bypass grafting.

Methods: Between July 2002 and October 2003, the GEA was used as a conduit for isolated off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in 105 patients. Of these, 21 patients (group P) received pedicled GEA and 59 patients (group S) received skeletonized GEA grafts (excluding 25 patients whose results were reported in the pilot study). The perioperative and early follow-up data were prospectively collected and compared.

Results: No graft injury was found in either group. The preoperative characteristics were similar in the two groups except that group S had a smaller body surface area (1.64 ± 0.16 m2 in group S versus 1.73 ± 0.16 m2 in group P, P < .05) and a significant number of patients with diabetes (36/59, 61.0% versus 7/21, 33.3%, P < .05). The number of distal anastomoses was 4.3 ± 1.0 versus 3.9 ± 0.9 (P = not significant [NS]). An in situ GEA composite graft was constructed in 8 (13.6%) of the patients in group S and none of the patients in group P (P = NS). There was one hospital death due to infection in group S. Otherwise, there were no cases of low output syndrome or postoperative myocardial infarction in either group. During early postoperative follow-up, no angina recurrence or myocardial infarction was found.

Conclusion: The GEA can be skeletonized safely with an ultrasonic scalpel. Skeletonization enables a wider variety of choices in the use of GEA grafting.

References

Amano A, Li R, Hirose H. 2004. Off-pump coronary artery bypass using skeletonized gastroepiploic artery. Heart Surg Forum [Epub] January 2004.\nAmano A, Takahashi A, Hirose H. 2002. Skeletonized radial artery grafting: improved angiographic results. Ann Thorac Surg 73:1880-7.\nAsai T, Tabata S. 2002. Skeletonization of the right gastroepiploic artery using an ultrasonic scalpel. Ann Thorac Surg 74:1715-7.\nChavanon O, Hacini R, Cracowski JL. 2001. Right gastroepiploic artery for coronary artery bypass grafting: a word of caution. Ann Thorac Surg 72:2184-5.\nDietl CA, Benoit CH, Gilbert CL, et al. 1995. Which is the graft of choice for the right coronary and posterior descending arteries? Comparison of the right internal mammary artery and the right gastroepiploic artery. Circulation 92(9 suppl):II92-7.\nGaudino M, Toesca A, Nori SL, et al. 1999. Effect of skeletonization of the internal thoracic artery on vessel wall integrity. Ann Thorac Surg 68:1623-7.\nHashimoto H, Isshiki T, Ikari Y, et al. 1996. Effects of competitive blood flow on arterial graft patency and diameter: medium-term postoperative follow-up. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 111:399-407.\nHe GW. 1999. Arterial grafts for coronary artery bypass grafting: biological characteristics, functional classification, and clinical choice. Ann Thorac Surg 67:277-84.\nHigami T, Kozawa S, Asada T, et al. 2000. Skeletonization and harvest of the internal thoracic artery with an ultrasonic scalpel. Ann Thorac Surg 70:307-8.\nHirose H, Amano A, Takanashi S, et al. 2002. Coronary artery bypass grafting using the gastroepiploic artery in 1,000 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 73:1371-9.\nLev-Ran O, Mohr R, Uretzky G, et al. 2003. Graft of choice to right coronary system in left-sided bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 75:88-92.\nMills NL, Hockmuth DR, Everson CT, et al. 1993. Right gastroepiploic artery used for coronary artery bypass grafting: evaluation of flow characteristics and size. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 106:579-85.\nRoyse AG, Royse CF, Tatoulis J. 1999. Total arterial coronary revascularization and factors influencing in-hospital mortality. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 16:499-505.\nSuma H, Fukumoto H, Takeuchi A. 1987. Coronary artery bypass grafting by utilizing in-situ right gastroepiploic artery: basic study and clinical application. Ann Thorac Surg 44:394-7.\nSuma H, Isomura T, Horii T, et al. 2000. Late angiographic result of using the right gastroepiploic artery as a graft. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 120:496-8.\nTanemoto K, Kanaoka Y, Murakami T, et al. 1998. Harmonic scalpel in coronary artery bypass surgery. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 39:493-5.\nTedoriya T, Kawasuji M, Sakakibara N, et al. 1995. Pressure characteristics in arterial grafts for coronary bypass surgery. Cardiovasc Surg 3:381-5.\nUchida N, Kawaue Y. 1996. Flow competition of the right gastroepiploic artery graft in coronary revascularization. Ann Thorac Surg 62:1342-6.\nUeda T, Taniguchi S, Kawata T, et al. 2003. Does skeletonization compromise the integrity of internal thoracic artery grafts? Ann Thorac Surg 75:1429-33.\nvan Son JA, Smedts FM, Yang CQ, et al. 1997. Morphometric study of the right gastroepiploic and inferior epigastric arteries. Ann Thorac Surg 63:709-15.\nYasuura K, Takagi Y, Ohara Y, et al. 2000. Theoretical analysis of right gastroepiploic artery grafting to right coronary artery. Ann Thorac Surg 69:728-31.\n
Published
2005-01-04
How to Cite
Li, R., Amano, A., Miyagawa, H., Dohi, S., Hayashi, I., Kajimoto, K., Shimada, A., & Hirose, H. (2005). Skeletonized Gastroepiploic Artery for Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. The Heart Surgery Forum, 7(2), E164-E169. https://doi.org/10.1532/HSF98.20033004
Section
Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)