Assessment of Nonlinear Heart Rate Dynamics after Beating-Heart Revascularization

Authors

  • Jus Ksela
  • Piotr Suwalski
  • Jurij Matija Kalisnik
  • Viktor Avbelj
  • Grzegorz Suwalski
  • Borut Gersak

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1532/HSF98.20081116

Abstract

Background: Advanced nonlinear methods of measuring heart rate variability (HRV) derived from the mathematics of complex dynamics and fractal geometry have provided new insights into the abnormalities of heart rate behavior in various pathologic conditions. These methods have provided additional prognostic information compared with traditional HRV measures and clearly have complemented the conventional linear methods. Knowledge about the behavior of complex cardiac dynamics indices after different cardiac procedures is very limited, however. We aimed to clarify how nonlinear heart rate dynamics are affected by beating-heart revascularization (off-pump coronary artery bypass graft [CABG] surgery) within the first week after the procedure.

Methods: Included in the study were 66 patients who had isolated stable multivessel coronary artery disease and were in normal sinus rhythm. The patients were on chronic ?-blocker therapy and were scheduled for off-pump CABG. We performed 15-minute high-resolution electrocardiographic recordings preoperatively and on the third and seventh postoperative days to assess linear and nonlinear heart rate dynamics. Frequency-domain measurements, detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA) with short-term (?11 beats, ?1) and long-term (>11 beats, ?2) correlation properties of RR-intervals, and fractal dimension (FD) measurements (average, high, and low) were made. Arrhythmia was monitored preoperatively with 24-hour Holter recordings, postoperatively by continuous monitoring for the first 4 days after the procedure, and subsequently by clinical monitoring; 24-hour Holter recordings were obtained again on the seventh postoperative day. We used the paired-samples Student t test, the Mann-Whitney U test, and the Fisher exact test for statistical analyses. Differences in arrhythmia occurrence before and after the procedure were tested with the Wilcoxon signed rank test and the McNemar test. A P level <.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: Values for all frequency-domain parameters decreased significantly after off-pump CABG (P < .001). Values for the ?1 and high FD parameters decreased significantly after the procedure (P = .028 and .001, respectively), whereas ?2 increased significantly (P = .023). DFA ?1 was significantly lower in patients with postoperative atrial fibrillation than in patients remaining in sinus rhythm (mean ± SD, 0.79 ± 0.32 versus 1.13 ± 0.45 [P = .003] on the third postoperative day; 0.89 ± 0.31 versus 1.22 ± 0.34 [P < .001] on the seventh postoperative day), whereas low and average FDs were significantly higher (1.84 ± 0.16 versus 1.68 ± 0.19 [P = .003] on the third postoperative day and 1.77 ± 0.18 versus 1.66 ± 0.17 [P = .01] on the seventh postoperative day for the low FD; 1.83 ± 0.09 versus 1.76 ± 0.10 [P = .011] on the third postoperative day and 1.80 ± 0.11 versus 1.73 ± 0.10 [P = .014] on the seventh postoperative day for the average FD). The low FD was significantly higher on the third postoperative day in patients with postoperative deterioration of ventricular ectopy than in patients with improved ventricular ectopy (1.74 ± 0.17 versus 1.48 ± 0.08, [P = .03]).

Conclusion: The decreases in ?1, average FD, and high FD indicate that a profound decay of cardiac complexity and fractal correlation can be observed after off-pump CABG. Furthermore, a more extensive impairment of nonlinear indices was observed in patients who developed postoperative arrhythmias than in those who remained in stable sinus rhythm. Our findings suggest that the postoperative hyperadrenergic setting acts as a preliminary condition in which both reduced and enhanced vagal activity may predispose patients to arrhythmia, indicating that postoperative rhythm disturbances are an end point associated with divergent autonomic substrates.

References

Acharya RU, Bhat PS, Kannathal N, Rao A, Lim CM. 2005. Analysis of cardiac health using fractal dimension and wavelet transformation. ITBM-RBM 26:133-9.nAmar D, Zhang H, Miodownik S, Kadish AH. 2003. Competing autonomic mechanisms precede the onset of postoperative atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 42:1262-8.nBauernschmitt R, Malberg H, Wessel N, et al. 2007. Autonomic control in patients experiencing atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 30:77-84.nBeckers F, Verheyden B, Aubert AE. 2006. Aging and nonlinear heart rate control in healthy population. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 290:H2560-70.nDavid M, Hirsch M, Akselrod S. 2006. Maturation of fetal cardiac autonomic control as expressed by fetal heart rate variability. Comput Cardiol 33:901-4.nDimmer C, Tavernier R, Gjorgov N, Van Nooten G, Clement DL, Jordaens L. 1998. Variations of autonomic tone preceding onset of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting. Am J Cardiol 82:22-5.nEchahidi N, Pibarot P, O'Hara G, Mathieu P. 2008. Mechanisms, prevention, and treatment of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol;51:793-801.nGoldberger AL, Amaral LA, Glass L, et al. 2000. PhysioBank, PhysioToolkit, and PhysioNet: components of a new research resource for complex physiologic signals. Circulation 101:E215-20.nHogue CW Jr, Domitrovich PP, Stein PK, et al. 1998. RR interval dynamics before atrial fibrillation in patients after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Circulation 98:429-34.nHuikuri HV, Mäkikallio TH, Perkiömäki. 2003. Measurements of heart rate variability by methods based on nonlinear dynamics. J Electrocardiol 36(suppl):95-9.nJokinen V, Tapanainen JM, Seppänen, Huikuri HV. 2003. Temporal changes and prognostic significance of measures of heart rate dynamics after acute myocardial infarction in the beta-blocking era. Am J Cardiol 92:907-12.nKalisnik JM, Avbelj V, Trobec R, et al. 2006. Assessment of cardiac autonomic regulation and ventricular repolarization after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Heart Surg Forum 9:E661-7.nKalisnik JM, Avbelj V, Trobec R, et al. 2007. Effects of beating- versus arrested-heart revascularization on cardiac autonomic regulation and arrhythmias. Heart Surg Forum 10:E279-87.nKikuchi A, Unno N, Horikoshi T, Shimizu T, Kozuma S, Taketani Y. 2005. Changes in fractal features of fetal heart rate during pregnancy. Early Hum Dev 81:655-61.nKrstacic G, Krstacic A, Smalcelj A, Milicic D, Jembrek-Gostovic M. 2007. The "chaos theory" and nonlinear dynamics in heart rate variability analysis: Does it work in short-time series in patients with coronary heart disease? Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 12:130-6.nMäkikallio TH, Huikuri HV, Mäkikallio A, et al. 2001. Prediction of sudden cardiac death by fractal analysis of heart rate variability in elderly subjects. J Am Coll Cardiol 37:1395-402.nMäkikallio TH, Seppänen T, Airaksinen KEJ, et al. 1997. Dynamic analysis of heart rate may predict subsequent ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 80:779-83.nPeng CK, Havlin S, Stanley HE, Goldberger AL. 1995. Quantification of scaling exponents and crossover phenomena in nonstationary heartbeat time series. Chaos 5:82-7.nPerkiömäki JS, Zareba W, Kalaria VG, Couderc J, Huikuri HV, Moss AJ. 2001. Comparability of nonlinear measures of heart rate variability between long- and short-term electrocardiographic recordings. Am J Cardiol 87:905-8.nSaeed M. 2005. Fractals analysis of cardiac arrhythmias. ScientificWorldJournal 5:691-701.nShin DG, Yoo CS, Yi SH, et al. 2006. Prediction of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation using nonlinear analysis of the R-R interval dynamics before the spontaneous onset of atrial fibrillation. Circ J 70:94-9.nSignorini M. 2004. Nonlinear analysis of heart rate variability: physiological knowledge and diagnostic indications. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 7:5407-10.n[ESC/NASPE] Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing Electrophysiology. 1996. Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. Circulation 93:1043-65.nTapanainen JM, Thomsen PEB, Køber L, et al. 2002. Fractal analysis of heart rate variability and mortality after an acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 90:347-52.nWu ZK, Vikman S, Laurikka J, et al. 2005. Nonlinear heart rate variability in CABG patients and the preconditioning effect. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 28:109-13.n

Published

2009-02-20

How to Cite

Ksela, J., Suwalski, P., Kalisnik, J. M., Avbelj, V., Suwalski, G., & Gersak, B. (2009). Assessment of Nonlinear Heart Rate Dynamics after Beating-Heart Revascularization. The Heart Surgery Forum, 12(1), E10-E16. https://doi.org/10.1532/HSF98.20081116

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>