Early and Late Outcome after Microwave Ablation for Chronic Valvular Atrial Fibrillation

Authors

  • Marian Zembala
  • Radosl/aw Lenarczyk
  • Zbigniew Kalarus
  • Dariusz Puszczewicz
  • Roman Przybylski
  • Jerzy Pacholewicz

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1532/hsf.1064

Abstract

Background: Microwave energy ablation is one of the newer therapeutic options for surgically treating patients with chronic atrial fibrillation (AF) concomitant with mitral valve disease. The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate potential risk factors that may have influenced early as well as remote outcome in a set of patients undergoing microwave energy ablation for chronic AF.

Methods: Patients (n = 42) underwent ablation on an arrested heart concomitant with mitral valve surgery. Twelve patients also underwent tricuspid valve repair or replacement. Logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate effect of potential risk factors on postablation rhythm status at discharge and at latest follow-up examination.

Results: With control for age, patients with recurrent AF at discharge (10/42 [24%]) tended to have preoperative AF of significantly longer duration (odds ratio [OR], 1.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-2.35; P = .01) and greater left atrial diameter (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.03-1.26, P = .01) than patients in sinus rhythm (32/42 [76%]). At latest follow-up examination, risk of AF was significantly heightened with longer duration of preoperative AF (OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.09-1.96; P = .01) and larger left atrium (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.02-1.23; P = .02) after adjustment for age, length of follow-up time, and presence of early arrhythmia recurrence.

Conclusions: Results for this consecutive series of patients indicated that early and late success after surgical energy ablation may be associated with discrete patient characteristics. Longer arrhythmia duration and greater left atrial diameter seem to be factors independently influencing early and remote success, and there seems to be a self-protective effect of the presence of sinus rhythm at discharge. Further study would be valuable to confirm our findings.

References

Vigano M, Graffigna A, Ressia L, et al. 1996. Surgery for atrial fibrillation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 10:490-7.nWijffels MC, Kirchhof CJ, Dorland R, Allesie MA. 1995. Atrial fibrillation begets atrial fibrillation: a study in awake chronically instrumented goats. Circulation 92:1954-68.nWilliams MR, Stewart JR, Bolling SF, et al. 2001. Surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation using radiofrequency energy. Ann Thorac Surg 71:1939-44.nYu WC, Hsu TL, Tai CT, et al. 2001. Acquired pulmonary vein stenosis after radiofrequency catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 12:887-92.nKnaut M, Spitzer SG, Karolyi L, et al. 1999. Intraoperative microwave ablation for curative treatment of atrial fibrillation in open heart surgery: the MICRO-STAF and MICRO-PASS pilot trial. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 47(suppl 3):379-84.nMoe GK. 1962. On the multiple wavelet hypothesis of atrial fibrillation. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther 140:183-8. Moe GK, Abildskow JA. 1959. Atrial fibrillation is a self-sustaining arrhythmia independent of focal discharge. Am Heart J 58:59-70.nOral H, Knight BP, Tada H, et al. 2002. Pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation. Circulation 105:1077-81.nPasic M, Bergs P, Müller P, et al. 2001. Intraoperative radiofrequency maze ablation for atrial fibrillation: the Berlin modification. Ann Thorac Surg 72:1484-91.nSueda T, Nagata H, Orihashi K, et al. 1997. Efficacy of a simple left atrial procedure for chronic atrial ?brillation in mitral valve operations. Ann Thorac Surg 63:1070-5.nVueda T, Nagata H, Orihashi K, et al. 1997. Efficacy of a simple left atrial procedure for chronic atrial fibrillation in mitral valve operations. Ann Thorac Surg 63:1070-5.nCoplen SE, Antman ER, Berlin JA, Hewitt P, Chalmers TC. 1990. Efficacy and safety of quinidine therapy for maintenance of sinus rhythm after cardioversion: a meta-analysis of randomized control trails. Circulation 82:1106-16.nCox JL, Ad N, Palazzo T, et al. 2000. Current status of the maze procedure for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 12:15-9.nGaita F, Gallotti R, Caló L, et al. 2000. Limited posterior left atrial cryoablation in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation undergoing valvular heart surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 36:159-66.nHaïssaguerre M, Jaïs P, Shah DC, et al. 2000. Electrophysiological end point for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation initiated from multiple pulmonary venous foci. Circulation 101:1409-17.nKalil RA, Maratia CB, D'Avila A, Ludwig FB. 1999. Predictive factors for persistence of atrial fibrillation after mitral valve operation. Ann Thorac Surg 67:614-7.n

Published

2005-02-08

How to Cite

Zembala, M., Lenarczyk, R., Kalarus, Z., Puszczewicz, D., Przybylski, R., & Pacholewicz, J. (2005). Early and Late Outcome after Microwave Ablation for Chronic Valvular Atrial Fibrillation. The Heart Surgery Forum, 6(5), 403-408. https://doi.org/10.1532/hsf.1064

Issue

Section

Article