Primary OPCAB as a Strategy for Acute Coronary Syndrome and Acute Myocardial Infarction

Authors

  • Marek J. Jasinski
  • Stanislaw Wos
  • Piotr Olszówka
  • Ryszard Bachowski
  • Wojciech Ceglarek
  • Kazimierz Widenka
  • Marek Gemel
  • Wojciech Domaradzki
  • Marek Deja
  • Adam Szafranek
  • Krzysztof Golba
  • Dariusz Szurlej

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1532/hsf.1053

Abstract

Background: Conventional coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) carries higher mortality and morbidity for patients undergoing surgery during acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate potential benefits of avoiding CPB by instead performing off-pump CAB (OPCAB) during surgery on patients in ACS.

Methods: Among 624 patients who underwent OPCAB between January 1999 and June 2001, 143 underwent surgery during ACS (group 1). The ACS patients in group 1 were divided into 2 subgroups: 66 underwent surgery during acute myocardial infarction (AMI group) and 77 during unstable angina classified as class III or IV according to the Braumwald classification (unstable coronary artery disease [CAD] group). Group 2 (the elective CAD group) consisted of 481 patients who underwent isolated elective OPCAB during the same time period.

Results: Overall 30-day mortality was 4.9% (n = 7) for the ACS group and 0.83% (n = 4) for the elective CAD group (P < .0001). Differences between groups were found in use of inotropes, intraaortic balloon pump, and subsequent conversion of OPCAB to CPB (P < .0001, P < .01, and P < .03, respectively), as well as use of blood transfusion (P < .0003). Multivariate logistic regression analysis for 641 patients revealed ACS (P < .015), AMI (P < .019), renal failure (P < .017), and left ventricle aneurysm (P < .028) as independent risk factors for 30-day mortality in ACS reoperation (P = .02), whereas in AMI renal failure (P = .02) appeared to be an independent risk factor.

Conclusions: OPCAB is a valuable treatment strategy in ACS patients; however, it carries significant mortality and morbidity. Careful preselection and timing of intervention are required in order for patients to fully benefit from the OPCAB strategy.

References

Floten HS, Ahmad A, Swanson JS, et al. 1989. Long-term survival after postinfarction bypass operation: early versus late operation. Ann Thorac Surg 48:757-62.nGott J, Han D. 1995. Surgical treatment of acute myocardial infarct-- clinical considerations. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 9:198-207.nGu AM. 1998. Reduction of the inflammatory response in patients undergoing minimally invasive CABG. Ann Thorac Surg 65:420-4.nLee DC, Oz MC. 2001. Appropriate timing of surgical intervention after transmural acute myocardial infarction. 81st Annual Meeting of American Association for Thoracic Surgery; 2001; San Diego, Calif, USA.nLocker C, Shapira I, Paz A, et al. 2000. Emergency myocardial revascularization for acute myocardial infarction: survival benefits of avoiding cardiopulmonary bypass. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 17:234-8.nLund O, Christensen J, Holme S, et al. 2001. On-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass: independent risk factors and of-pump graft patency. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 20:901-7.nMorrison D, Sethi G, Sacks J, et al. 2001. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus CABG for patients with medically refractory myocardial ischemia and risk factors for adverse outcomes with bypass: a multicenter trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 38:143-9.nApplebaum R, House R, Rademaker A, et al. 1991. Coronary artery bypass grafting within thirty days of acute myocardial infarction. Early and late results in 406 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 102:745-52.nArom KV, Flavin TF, Emery RW, Kshettry VR, Petersen RJ, Janey PA. 2000. Is low ejection fraction safe for off-pump coronary bypass operation? Ann Thorac Surg 70:1021-5.nBerg R Jr, Selinger SL, Leonard JJ, Grunwald RP, O'Grady WP. 1981. Immediate coronary artery bypass for acute evolving myocardial infarction. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 81:493-7.nBorkon AM, Failing TL, Piehler JM, Killen DA, Hoskins ML, Reed WA. 1992. Risk analysis of operative intervention for failed coronary angioplasty. Ann Thorac Surg 54:884-90; discussion 890-1.nSintek CF, Pfeffer TA, Khonsari S. 1994. Surgical revascularization after acute myocardial infarction. Does timing make a difference? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 107:1317-21.nVarghese D, Yacoub MH, Trimlett R, Amrani M. 2001. Outcome of non-elective coronary artery bypass grafting without cardio-pulmonary bypass. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 19:245-8.nvon Segesser LK, Popp J, Amann FW, Turina MI. 1994. Surgical revascularization in acute myocardial infarction. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 8:368-9.nWeerasinghe A, Hornick P, Smith P, Taylo K, Ratnatunga C. 2001. Coronary artery bypass grafting in non-dialysis dependent mild to moderate renal dysfunction. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 121:1083-9.n

Published

2005-02-08

How to Cite

Jasinski, M. J., Wos, S., Olszówka, P., Bachowski, R., Ceglarek, W., Widenka, K., Gemel, M., Domaradzki, W., Deja, M., Szafranek, A., Golba, K., & Szurlej, D. (2005). Primary OPCAB as a Strategy for Acute Coronary Syndrome and Acute Myocardial Infarction. The Heart Surgery Forum, 6(5), 331-335. https://doi.org/10.1532/hsf.1053

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)