Heparin Dose, Transfusion Rates, and Intraoperative Graft Patency in Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass

  • Harry W. Donias
  • Giuseppe D'Ancona
  • Ravi U. Pande
  • Dennis Schimpf
  • Akira T. Kawaguchi
  • Hratch L. Karamanoukian

Abstract

Background: Many investigators have demonstrated the short-term and midterm efficacy of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB). However, the influence of heparin dosing during MIDCAB on postoperative and immediate graft patency is less well defined. This report outlines our experience with MIDCAB employing a variety of heparinization protocols.

Methods: The traditional MIDCAB approach was used in 152 patients who underwent single-vessel off-pump coronary artery bypass. Before the left internal mammary artery was divided, a 150-U/kg bolus of heparin sodium was given to 76 patients (group 1), and 300 U/kg was given to another 76 patients (group 2). Additional heparin was given during the procedures to maintain an activated clotting times of greater than 300 seconds for group 1 and greater than 400 seconds for group 2.

Results: On average, patients in group 1 required more boluses of heparin during treatment than patients in group 2. A larger standard deviation from the mean was observed for the activated clotting time in group 1 at any time during treatment than for patients in group 2. The number of revised grafts was smaller in group 2 (1/76, 1.3%) than in group 1 (4/76, 5.2%). All of these revisions revealed thrombus at the site of anastomosis. In addition, noncoronary thrombotic complications were seen in 5 patients in group 1, and none were seen in group 2.

Conclusion: Coronary artery surgery without cardiopulmonary bypass does not trigger the systemic inflammatory response, but surgical tissue trauma remains a constant. The preserved hemostasis theoretically may lead to a procoagulant state. This study demonstrates that insufficient anticoagulation therapy can lead to intracoronary thrombosis following MIDCAB as well as increased noncoronary thrombotic complications.

References

Calafiore AM, DiMauro M, Contini M, et al. 2001. Myocardial revascularization with and without cardiopulmonary bypass in multivessel disease: impact of the strategy on early outcome. Ann Thorac Surg 72:456-62.\nContini M, Vitolla G, D'Addario GD, Calafiore AM. 2001. The left anterior small thoracotomy operation. In: Salerno TA, Ricci M, Karamanoukian HL, D'Ancona G, Bergsland J, editors. Beating heart coronary artery surgery. Armonk, New York: Futura Publishing Company. p 105-16.\nD'Ancona G, Donias HW, Karamanoukian RL, Bergsland J, Karamanoukian HL. 2001. OPCAB therapy survey: off-pump clopidogrel, aspirin, or both therapy survey. Heart Surg Forum 4:354-8.\nD'Ancona G, Karamanoukian HL, Bergsland J. 2001. Is intraoperative measurement of coronary blood flow a good predictor of graft patency? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 20:1075-7.\nD'Ancona G, Karamanoukian HL, Ricci M, et al. 2000. Intraoperative graft patency verification: should you trust your fingertips? Heart Surg Forum 3:99-102.\nEdmunds LH. 1998. Inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 66:S12-6.\nKaramanoukian HL, Kawaguchi AT, Karamanoukian RL, Spanu I, D'Ancona G, Bergsland J. 2001. Mid-term results after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Heart Surg Forum 4:S76.\nLancey R, Soller BR, Vander Salm TJ. 2000. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: a case-matched comparison of clinical outcomes and costs. Heart Surg Forum 3:277-81.\nMack M, Damiano R, Matheny R, Reichenspurner H, Carpentier A. 1999. Inertia of success: a response to minimally invasive coronary artery bypass. Circulation 99:1404-6.\nMack MJ. 2001. Minimally invasive and robotic surgery. JAMA 285:568-72.\nMariani M, Gu YJ, Boonstra PW, Grandjean JG, van Oeveren W, Ebels T. 1999. Procoagulant activity after off-pump coronary operations: is the current anticoagulation adequate? Ann Thorac Surg 67:1370-5.\nNader N, Khadra W, Reich N, Bacon D, Salerno T, Panos T. 1999. Blood product use in cardiac revascularization: comparison of on- and off-pump techniques. Ann Thorac Surg 68:1640-3.\nOhata T, Sawa Y, Kaboda K, Masai T, Ichikawa H, Matsuda H. 1997. Effect of cardiopulmonary bypass under tepid temperature on the inflammatory reaction. Ann Thorac Surg 64:124-8.\nPuskas JD, Wright CE, Ronson RS, Brown WM III, Gott JP, Guyton RA. 1999. Clinical outcomes and angiographic patency in 125 consecutive off-pump coronary bypass patients. Heart Surg Forum 2:216-21.\nStamou SC, Jablonski KA, Pfister AJ, et al. 2001. Coronary revascularization without cardiopulmonary bypass is associated with a lower hospital mortality than the conventional approach. Heart Surg Forum 4:S77.\nVassiliades TA, Rogers EW, Nielsen JL, Lonquist JL. 2000. Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting: intermediate-term results. Ann Thorac Surg 70:1063-5.\nBergsland J, D'Ancona G, Karamanoukian HL, Ricci M, Schmid S, Salerno TA. 2000. Technical tips and pitfalls in OPCAB surgery: the Buffalo experience. Heart Surg Forum 3:189-93.\nBergsland J, Karamanoukian HL, Soltoski PR, Salerno TA. 1999. "Single suture" for circumflex exposure in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 68:1428-30.\nButler J, Rocker GM, Westaby S. 1993. Inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 55:552-9.\n
Published
2005-02-07
How to Cite
Donias, H. W., D’Ancona, G., Pande, R. U., Schimpf, D., Kawaguchi, A. T., & Karamanoukian, H. L. (2005). Heparin Dose, Transfusion Rates, and Intraoperative Graft Patency in Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass. The Heart Surgery Forum, 6(3), 176-180. https://doi.org/10.1532/hsf.818
Section
Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>