A Clinical and Economic Evaluation of Fast-Track Recovery after Cardiac Surgery

Authors

  • Kareem Salhiyyah
  • Sherif Elsobky
  • Shahzad Raja
  • Rizwan Attia
  • John Brazier
  • Graham J. Cooper

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1532/HSF98.20111029

Abstract

Background: In the last 5 decades, the care of cardiac surgical patients has improved with the aid of strategies aimed at facilitating patient recovery. One of the innovations in this context is "fast-tracking" or "rapid recovery." This process refers to all interventions that aim to shorten a patient's stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) through accelerating the patient's transfer to a step-down or telemetry unit and to the general ward.

Methods: Patients were allocated to 2 groups. The fast-track group (n = 84) went through an independent theatre recovery unit (TRU). The patients were then transferred on the same day to an intermediate care unit and transferred on the following day to the ward. The intensive care group (52 patients) went to the ICU for at least 1 day, after which they were transferred to the ward.

Results and Discussion: The fast-track pathway significantly reduced the length of stay (LOS) in an intensive care facility (P < .001). The duration of intubation was reduced from a median of 4.08 hours (range, 1.17-13.17 hours) in the intensive care group to 2.75 hours (range, 0.25-18.57 hours) in the fast-track group (P < .001). However, the median values for total hospital LOS, incidences of complications, reintubation, and readmission were similar for the 2 groups. The incidence of failure in the fast-track group was 10%. The mean (SD) cost of the perioperative care was £4182 ± £2284 ($6683 ± 3650) for the fast-track patients, compared with £4553 ± £1355 ($7277 ± $2165) for the intensive care group.

Conclusion: Fast-track recovery after cardiac surgery decreases the intensive care LOS and the total duration of intubation. It is a cost-effective strategy compared with conventional recovery protocols; however, it does not reduce the total hospital LOS or the incidence of complications.

References

Booth JE, Roberts JA, Flather M, et al. 2004. A trial of early discharge with homecare compared to conventional hospital care for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Heart 90:1344-5.nBrown MM. 2000. Implementation strategy: one-stop recovery for cardiac surgical patients. AACN Clin Issues 11:412-23.nCalafiore AM, Scipioni G, Teodori G, et al. 2002. Day 0 intensive care unit discharge: risk or benefit for the patient who undergoes myocardial revascularization? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 21:377-84.nCheng DC. 1995. Pro: early extubation after cardiac surgery decreases intensive care unit stay and cost. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 9:460-4.nChong JL, Grebenik C, Sinclair M, Fisher A, Pillai R, Westaby S. 1993. The effect of a cardiac surgical recovery area on the timing of extubation. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 7:137-41.nChong JL, Pillai R, Fisher A, Grebenik C, Sinclair M, Westaby S. 1992. Cardiac surgery: moving away from intensive care. Br Heart J 68:430-3.nFlynn M, Reddy S, Shepherd W, et al. 2004. Fast-tracking revisited: routine cardiac surgical patients need minimal intensive care. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 25:116-22.nHadjinikolaou L, Cohen A, Glenville B, Stanbridge RD. 2000. The effect of a ‘fast-track’ unit on the performance of a cardiothoracic department. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 82:53-8.nHawkes CA, Dhileepan S, Foxcroft D. 2003. Early extubation for adult cardiac surgical patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003:CD003587.nJegers M, Edbrooke DL, Hibbert CL, Chalfin DB, Burchardi H. 2002. Definitions and methods of cost assessment: an intensivist's guide. ESICM Section on Health Research and Outcome Working Group on Cost Effectiveness. Intensive Care Med 28:680-5.nJindani A, Aps C, Neville E, et al. 1993. Postoperative cardiac surgical care: an alternative approach. Br Heart J 69:59-63.nMassey D, Meggit G. 1994. Recovery units: the future of postoperative cardiac care. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 10:71-4.nMoon MC, Abdoh A, Hamilton GA, et al. 2001. Safety and efficacy of fast track in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. J Card Surg 16:319-26.nNalysnyk L, Fahrbach K, Reynolds MW, Zhao SZ, Ross S. 2003. Adverse events in coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) trials: a systematic review and analysis. Heart 89:676-772.nNaughton C, Cheek L, O'Hara K. 2005. Rapid recovery following cardiac surgery: a nursing perspective. Br J Nurs 14:214-9.nOtt RA, Gutfinger DE, Miller MP, et al. 1997. Coronary artery bypass grafting "on pump": role of three-day discharge. Ann Thorac Surg 64:478-81.nRanucci M, Bellucci C, Conti D, Cazzaniga A, Maugeri B. 2007. Determinants of early discharge from the intensive care unit after cardiac operations. Ann Thorac Surg 83:1089-95.nStaples JR, Ramsay JG. 1997. Advances in anaesthesia for cardiac surgery: an overview for the 1990s. AACN Clin Issues 8:41-9.nWestaby S, Pillai R, Parry A, et al. 1993. Does modern cardiac surgery require conventional intensive care? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 7:313-8.nYusuf S, Zucker D, Peduzzi P, et al. 1994. Effect of coronary artery bypass graft surgery on survival: overview of 10-year results from randomised trials by the Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Trial Lists Collaboration. Lancet 344:563-70.n

Published

2011-12-13

How to Cite

Salhiyyah, K., Elsobky, S., Raja, S., Attia, R., Brazier, J., & Cooper, G. J. (2011). A Clinical and Economic Evaluation of Fast-Track Recovery after Cardiac Surgery. The Heart Surgery Forum, 14(6), E330-E334. https://doi.org/10.1532/HSF98.20111029

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)