Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in a Low-Volume Center


  • Kamales Kumar Saha
  • Mandar Deval
  • Lukash Jagdale
  • Preetam Sahani



Background: The advantages of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) are well documented; however, the conversion of OPCAB to cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is associated with higher morbidity and mortality. This issue is of particular concern in low-volume centers or centers that are beginning to use OPCAB. We present an OPCAB methodology that uses a maximum number of arterial grafts.

Methods: We routinely use OPCAB in every patient unless there is another associated condition. We used the following methods to improve the safety of OPCAB: (1) maintaining normothermia, (2) routine use of a pulmonary artery catheter, (3) routine use of a femoral arterial line, (4) routine use of a cell saver, and (5) complete revascularization.

Results: We included 173 consecutive patients in the study. All patients underwent OPCAB without any conversion to CPB. Hemodynamic compromise in 5 patients (2.89%) required insertion of an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP). OPCAB was completed in all 5 patients after IABP insertion. Blood transfusions (BTs) were avoided in 55 patients (31.8%), and 68 patients (39.3%) required ?2 units of blood.

Conclusion: The OPCAB technique is still evolving. Low-volume centers have higher rates of conversion to CPB. Hypotension due to an impaired left ventricular function can be successfully treated by using an IABP. Although blood loss can be managed with BTs, use of a cell saver helps to reduce the number of BTs. We conclude that our technique of total arterial OPCAB using a cell saver can be safely performed in a low-volume center.


Al-Ruzzeh S, George S, Bustami M, et al. 2006. Effect of off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery on clinical, angiographic, neurocognitive, and quality of life outcomes: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 332:1365.nBainbridge D, Martin J, Cheng D. 2005. Off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus conventional coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a systematic review of the literature. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 9:105-11.nBrown PP, Mack MJ, Simon AW, et al. 2001. Comparing clinical outcomes in high-volume and low-volume off-pump coronary bypass operation programs. Ann Thorac Surg 72:S1009-15.nCalafiore AM, Contini M, Vitolla G, et al. 2000. Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting: long-term clinical and angiographic results of in situ versus Y grafts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 120:990-8.nEdgerton JR, Dewey TM, Magee MJ, et al. 2003. Conversion in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: an analysis of predictors and outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg 76:1138-43.nFuster RG, Estornell J, Gil O, Montero JA. 2002. Arterial graft extension with radial artery: a method of total arterial revascularization. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 26:839-41.nGregoric ID, Poglajen G, Span M, Frazier OH, Loyalka P, Kar B. 2008. Percutaneous ventricular assist device support during off-pump surgical coronary revascularization. Ann Thorac Surg 86:637-9.nHovakimyan A, Manukyan V, Ghazaryan S, Saghatelyan M, Abrahamyan L, Hovaquimian H. 2008. Predictors of emergency conversion to onpump during off-pump coronary surgery. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 16:226-30.nMukherjee D, Ahmed K, Baig K, Patel VM, Darzi A, Athanasiou T. 2011. Conversion and safety in off-pump coronary artery bypass: a system failure that needs re-emphasis. Ann Thorac Surg 91:630-9.nParolari A, Alamanni F, Polvani G, et al. 2005. Meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing off-pump with on-pump coronary artery bypass graft patency. Ann Thorac Surg 80:2121-5.nPatel NC, Patel NU, Loulmet DF, McCabe JC, Subramanian VA. 2004. Emergency conversion to cardiopulmonary bypass during attempted off-pump revascularization results in increased morbidity and mortality. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 128:655-61.nPick AW, Orszulak TA, Anderson BJ, Schaff HV. 1997. Single versus bilateral internal mammary artery grafts: 10-year outcome analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 64:599-605.nPuskas JD, Williams WH, Mahoney EM, et al. 2004. Off-pump vs conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: early and 1-year graft patency, cost, and quality of life outcomes: a randomized trial. JAMA 291:1841-9.nRaja SG, Siddiqui H, Ilsley CD, Amrani M. 2009. In-hospital outcomes of off-pump multivessel total arterial and conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: single surgeon, single center experience. Ann Thorac Surg 88:47-53.nSoltoski P, Salerno T, Levinsky L, et al. 1998. Conversion to cardiopulmonary bypass in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: its effect on outcome. J Card Surg 13:328-34.nTanaka K, Naruse Y, Sato K. 2008. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting using in-situ right internal thoracic artery extended with radial artery as I-composite graft [in Japanese]. Kyobu Geka 61:175-9.nTector AJ, McDonald ML, Kress DC, Downey FX, Schmahl TM. 2001. Purely internal thoracic artery grafts: outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg 72:450-5.nWijeysundera DN, Beattie WS, Djaiani G, et al. 2005. Off-pump coronary artery surgery for reducing mortality and morbidity: meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:872-82.n



How to Cite

Saha, K. K., Deval, M., Jagdale, L., & Sahani, P. (2011). Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in a Low-Volume Center. The Heart Surgery Forum, 14(6), E349-E353.




Most read articles by the same author(s)