Comparison of On-Pump Beating Heart Surgery Versus Conventional Bypass Surgery in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Requiring Urgent Revascularization
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59958/hsf.7203Keywords:
on pump beating-heart, coronary artery bypass grafting, cardiac surgery, emergency myocardial revascularizationAbstract
Background: The objective of our study was to provide the initial outcomes of the traditional coronary artery surgery approach and the on-pump beating heart surgery in terms of survival and morbidity in patients who needed emergency surgery for acute myocardial infarction. Methods: A single-center retrospective study was performed from November 2013 to September 2023 on a total of 212 patients requiring emergency coronary artery surgery. Group I patients (n = 108) received traditional coronary artery bypass grafting with cross-clamping, while Group II patients (n = 104) underwent on-pump coronary surgery on the beating heart. Results: There were no disparities observed in the preoperative left ventricular function, percutaneous coronary intervention, intra-aortic balloon usage, or clinical-hemodynamic characteristics. Group I patients had significantly higher rates of postoperative mortality and low cardiac output syndrome, as well as a greater utilization of intra-aortic balloons and a higher requirement for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Ultimately, the on-pump beating heart approach could serve as a viable alternative to enhance the preservation of cardiac function and decrease postoperative complications and mortality rates in patients with acute myocardial infarction who require emergency surgery.
References
Gulcan O, Turkoz R, Turkoz A, Caliskan E, Sezgin AT. On-pump/beating-heart myocardial protection for isolated or combined coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with severe left ventricle dysfunction: assessment of myocardial function and clinical outcome. The Heart Surgery Forum. 2005; 8: E178–E182; discussion E183.
Erkut B, Dag O, Kaygin MA, Senocak M, Limandal HK, Arslan U, et al. On-pump beating-heart versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting for revascularization in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction: early outcomes. Canadian Journal of Surgery. Journal Canadien De Chirurgie. 2013; 56: 398–404.
Ferrari R, La Canna G, Giubbini R, Milan E, Ceconi C, de Giuli F, et al. Left ventricular dysfunction due to stunning and hibernation in patients. Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy. 1994; 8 Suppl 2: 371–380.
Hillis LD, Smith PK, Anderson JL, Bittl JA, Bridges CR, Byrne JG, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2011; 58: e123–e210.
Prifti E, Bonacchi M, Giunti G, Frati G, Proietti P, Leacche M, et al. Does on-pump/beating-heart coronary artery bypass grafting offer better outcome in end-stage coronary artery disease patients? Journal of Cardiac Surgery. 2000; 15: 403–410.
Miyahara K, Matsuura A, Takemura H, Saito S, Sawaki S, Yoshioka T, et al. On-pump beating-heart coronary artery bypass grafting after acute myocardial infarction has lower mortality and morbidity. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2008; 135: 521–526.
Wasvary H, Shannon F, Bassett J, O'Neill W. Timing of coronary artery bypass grafting after acute myocardial infarction. The American Surgeon. 1997; 63: 710–715.
Buffolo E, de Andrade CS, Branco JN, Teles CA, Aguiar LF, Gomes WJ. Coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 1996; 61: 63–66.
Gundry SR, Romano MA, Shattuck OH, Razzouk AJ, Bailey LL. Seven-year follow-up of coronary artery bypasses performed with and without cardiopulmonary bypass. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 1998; 115: 1273–1277; discussion 1277–1278.
Khan NE, De Souza A, Mister R, Flather M, Clague J, Davies S, et al. A randomized comparison of off-pump and on-pump multivessel coronary-artery bypass surgery. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2004; 350: 21–28.
Sabik JF, Gillinov AM, Blackstone EH, Vacha C, Houghtaling PL, Navia J, et al. Does off-pump coronary surgery reduce morbidity and mortality? The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2002; 124: 698–707.
Bell MR, Gersh BJ, Schaff HV, Holmes DR, Jr, Fisher LD, Alderman EL, et al. Effect of completeness of revascularization on long-term outcome of patients with three-vessel disease undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. A report from the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) Registry. Circulation. 1992; 86: 446–457.
Scott R, Blackstone EH, McCarthy PM, Lytle BW, Loop FD, White JA, et al. Isolated bypass grafting of the left internal thoracic artery to the left anterior descending coronary artery: late consequences of incomplete revascularization. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2000; 120: 173–184.
Krejca M, Skiba J, Szmagala P, Gburek T, Bochenek A. Cardiac troponin T release during coronary surgery using intermittent cross-clamp with fibrillation, on-pump and off-pump beating heart. European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery: Official Journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery. 1999; 16: 337–341.
Ascione R, Lloyd CT, Gomes WJ, Caputo M, Bryan AJ, Angelini GD. Beating versus arrested heart revascularization: evaluation of myocardial function in a prospective randomized study. European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery: Official Journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery. 1999; 15: 685–690.
Koh TW, Carr-White GS, DeSouza AC, Ferdinand FD, Hooper J, Kemp M, et al. Intraoperative cardiac troponin T release and lactate metabolism during coronary artery surgery: comparison of beating heart with conventional coronary artery surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Heart (British Cardiac Society). 1999; 81: 495–500.
Izumi Y, Magishi K, Ishikawa N, Kimura F. On-pump beating-heart coronary artery bypass grafting for acute myocardial infarction. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2006; 81: 573–576.
Edgerton JR, Herbert MA, Jones KK, Prince SL, Acuff T, Carter D, et al. On-Pump Beating Heart Surgery Offers an Alternative for Unstable Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. The Heart Surgery Forum. 2004; 7: 8–15.
Patel NC, Patel NU, Loulmet DF, McCabe JC, Subramanian VA. Emergency conversion to cardiopulmonary bypass during attempted off-pump revascularization results in increased morbidity and mortality. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2004; 128: 655–661.
Mizutani S, Matsuura A, Miyahara K, Eda T, Kawamura A, Yoshioka T, et al. On-pump beating-heart coronary artery bypass: a propensity matched analysis. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2007; 83: 1368–1373.
Pocar M, Moneta A, Grossi A, Donatelli F. Coronary artery bypass for heart failure in ischemic cardiomyopathy: 17-year follow-up. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2007; 83: 468–474.
Borowski A, Korb H. Myocardial infarction in coronary bypass surgery using on-pump, beating heart technique with pressure- and volume-controlled coronary perfusion. Journal of Cardiac Surgery. 2002; 17: 272–278.
Kazui T, Osada H, Fujita H. Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery in Japan during 2004. Annual report by the Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery. The Japanese Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2006; 54: 363–386.
Edgerton JR, Dewey TM, Magee MJ, Herbert MA, Prince SL, Jones KK, et al. Conversion in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: an analysis of predictors and outcomes. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2003; 76: 1138–1142; discussion 1142–1143.
Matsuhashi K, Takami Y, Maekawa A, Yamana K, Akita K, Amano K, et al. Comparison between Off-Pump and On-Pump Beating Heart Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon. 2024. (online ahead of print.)
Rao YM, Potdar S, Das D, Saha A, Kapoor L, Das M, et al. On-pump beating heart versus off-pump myocardial revascularization-a propensity-matched comparison. Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2021; 37: 639–646.
Wang C, Jiang Y, Jiang X, Chen S. On-pump beating heart versus conventional on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting on clinical outcomes: a meta-analysis. Journal of Thoracic Disease. 2021; 13: 4169–4184.
Zhu MZL, Huq MM, Billah BM, Tran L, Reid CM, Varatharajah K, et al. On-Pump Beating Heart Versus Conventional Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Early After Myocardial Infarction: A Propensity-Score Matched Analysis From the ANZSCTS Database. Heart, Lung & Circulation. 2019; 28: 1267–1276.
Kim HJ, Oh YN, Ju MH, Kim JB, Jung SH, Chung CH, et al. On-pump beating heart versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: comparative study on early and long-term clinical outcomes. Journal of Thoracic Disease. 2018; 10: 2656–2665.
Khorsandi M, Dougherty S, Bouamra O, Pai V, Curry P, Tsui S, et al. Extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiogenic shock after adult cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery. 2017; 12: 55.
Ivanov B, Krasivskyi I, Gerfer S, Sabashnikov A, Doss M, Holzhey D, et al. Impact of Initial Operative Urgency on Short-Term Outcomes in Patients Treated with ECMO Due to Postcardiotomy Cardiogenic Shock. Life (Basel, Switzerland). 2022; 12: 1872.
Li C, Wang H, Liu N, Jia M, Hou X. The Effect of Simultaneous Renal Replacement Therapy on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support for Postcardiotomy Patients with Cardiogenic Shock: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. 2019; 33: 3063–3072.
