Computerized Tomography May Underestimate the Patency of Internal Thoracic Artery Composite Grafts

Authors

  • Cheong Lim
  • Kay-Hyun Park
  • Tae-Hun Kim
  • Yochun Jung
  • Il Park
  • Sang Il Choi
  • Eun Ju Chun

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1532/HSF98.20111125

Abstract

Background: Multidetector-row computerized tomography (MDCT) has been regarded as useful for noninvasive assessment of the bypass grafts after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), but there have been few reports validating its accuracy in assessment of composite arterial graft patency.

Methods: In 108 patients who underwent CABG with a Y-composite graft made of bilateral internal thoracic arteries (ITAs), early postoperative (mean interval, 4.9 months) MDCT findings were compared with the findings of subsequent conventional coronary angiography (19 patients, mean 4.7 months after initial MDCT) or later MDCT (89 patients, mean 31.0 months after surgery). A total of 248 grafts with 409 distal anastomoses (mean 3.8/patient) were assessed.

Results: In the early MDCT, the left ITA was patent in 94.4%. The right ITA with multiple sequential anastomoses was completely patent in 73.8% and partially patent in 21.4%. Discrepancy of findings between early computed tomography (CT) and later imaging studies was found in 18 patients (16.7%). Fourteen (42.4%, 4 left and 10 right ITAs) among the 33 initially nonvisualized grafts showed improved patency in later MDCT or conventional angiogram. The positive predictive value of the early MDCT for ITA composite graft occlusion was calculated at 57.6% or lower, whereas the negative predictive value was 97.8% or higher.

Conclusions: For a composite graft made of bilateral ITAs, especially for those with multiple sequential anastomoses, MDCT may reflect only the functional patency and underestimate the actual anatomic patency.

References

Auguadro C, Manfredi M, Scalise F, et al. 2009. Multislice computed tomography for the evaluation of coronary bypass grafts and native coronary arteries: comparison with traditional angiography. J Cardiovasc Med 10:454-60.nBonacchi M, Prifti E, Maiani M, et al. 2006. Perioperative and clinical-angiographic late outcome of total arterial myocardial revascularization according to different composite original graft techniques. Heart Vessels 21:69-77.nBonacchi M, Prifti E, Giunti G, Frati G. 2001. Restoration of patency after apparent occlusion of the lambda-graft's right branch. Heart Vessels 16:20-2.nCrusco F, Antoniella A, Papa V, Menzano R, Giovagnoni A. 2007. Evidence based medicine: role of multidetector CT in the follow-up of patients receiving coronary artery bypass graft. Radiol Med 112:509-25.nDamgaard S, Steinbrüchel DA, Kjaergard HK. 2005. An update on internal mammary artery grafting for coronary artery disease. Curr Opin Cardiol 20:521-4.nFeuchtner GM, Schachner T, Bonatti J, et al. 2007. Diagnostic performance of 64-slice computed tomography in evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafts. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:574-80.nFukuda I, Takeyasu N, Noguchi Y. 2003. Spontaneous recanalization of functionally occluded bilateral internal thoracic artery T graft. J Cardiovasc Surg 44:209-11.nHamon M, Lepage O, Malagutti P, et al. 2008. Diagnostic performance of 16- and 64-section spiral CT for coronary artery bypass graft assessment: meta-analysis. Radiology 247:679-86.nHata M, Shiono M, Orime Y, et al. 1999. Spontaneous recanalization of postoperative severe graft stenosis. What is the cause and prognosis of the "string sign" in the internal thoracic artery? Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 5:52-5.nHouslay ES, Lawton T, Sengupta A, Uren NG, McKillop G, Newby DE. 2007. Non-invasive assessment of coronary artery bypass graft patency using 16-slice computed tomography angiography. J Cardiothorac Surg 2:27-34.nJung SH, Song H, Choo SJ, et al. 2009. Comparison of radial artery patency according to proximal anastomosis site: direct aorta to radial artery anastomosis is superior to radial artery composite grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 138:76-83.nKim JB, Kang JW, Song H, et al. 2011. Late improvement in graft patency after coronary artery bypass grafting: Serial assessment with multidetector computed tomography in the early and late postoperative settings. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 142:793-9.nLu M, Jen-Sho Chen J, Awan O, White CS. Evaluation of bypass grafts and stents. 2010. Radiol Clin North Am 48:757-70.nManabe S, Fukui T, Tabata M, Shimokawa T, Morita S, Takanashi S. 2010. Arterial graft deterioration one year after coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 140:1306-11.nMarano R, Liguori C, Rinaldi P, et al. 2007. Coronary artery bypass grafts and MDCT imaging: what to know and what to look for. Eur Radiol 17:3166-78.nMuneretto C, Bisleri G, Negri A, et al. 2003. Total arterial myocardial revascularization with composite grafts improves results of coronary surgery in elderly: a prospective randomized comparison with conventional coronary artery bypass surgery. Circulation 108(Suppl 1):II29-33.nNakajima H, Kobayashi J, Toda K, et al. 2011. A 10-year angiographic follow-up of competitive flow in sequential and composite arterial grafts. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 40:399-404.nNakajima H, Kobayashi J, Toda K, et al. 2010. Safety and efficacy of sequential and composite arterial grafting to more than five coronary branches in off-pump coronary revascularisation: assessment of intra-operative and angiographic bypass flow. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 37:94-9.nPache G, Saueressig U, Frydrychowicz A, et al. 2006. Initial experience with 64-slice cardiac CT: non-invasive visualization of coronary artery bypass grafts. Eur Heart J 27:976-80.nPevni D, Hertz I, Medalion B, et al. 2007. Angiographic evidence for reduced graft patency due to competitive flow in composite arterial T-grafts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 133:1220-5.nRomagnoli A, Patrei A, Mancini A, et al. 2010. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice CT in evaluating coronary artery bypass grafts and of the native coronary arteries. Radiol Med 115:1167-78.nTagusari O, Kobayashi J, Bando K, et al. 2004. Total arterial off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting for revascularization of the total coronary system: clinical outcome and angiographic evaluation. Ann Thorac Surg 78:1304-11.nTürkvatan A, Biyiko?lu SF, Büyükbayraktar FG, et al. 2009. Noninvasive evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafts and native coronary arteries: is 16-slice multidetector CT useful? Diagn Interv Radiol 15:43-50.n

Published

2012-04-26

How to Cite

Lim, C., Park, K.-H., Kim, T.-H., Jung, Y., Park, I., Choi, S. I., & Chun, E. J. (2012). Computerized Tomography May Underestimate the Patency of Internal Thoracic Artery Composite Grafts. The Heart Surgery Forum, 15(2), E73-E78. https://doi.org/10.1532/HSF98.20111125

Issue

Section

Article