High-Risk Patients with Multivessel Disease—Is There a Role for Incomplete Myocardial Revascularization via Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting?

Authors

  • Stephan Jacobs
  • David Holzhey
  • Volkmar Falk
  • Jens Garbade
  • Thomas Walther
  • Friedrich W. Mohr

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1532/HSF98.20061193

Abstract

Background: Patients with multivessel disease with high predicted mortality for conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) as the major target vessel may be suitable for minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) despite incomplete revascularization.

Methods: From January 1997 to December 2005, MIDCAB was performed in 80 patients (mean age 70 ± 11.3 years) with multivessel disease. Predicted mortality was 10.2% calculated by the logistic Euroscore. Results were analyzed retrospectively for mortality, morbidity, operation time, and event-free survival, including freedom from angina, major adverse cardiac events (MACE), and reintervention.

Results: Mean operating time was 100 ± 31 minutes. There was one in-hospital death (1.25%). Four patients (5%) had to be reoperated on, 2 via the minithoracotomy incision and 2 via sternotomy. Follow-up was completed in 87% of patients. During follow-up (26 months), 9 patients died. The cause of death was cardiac in 1 patient, noncardiac in 3 patients, and unknown in 5 patients. Two patients required reoperation because of progressive atherosclerosis, and 2 patients because of progressive valve disease. The actuarial 4-year survival was 85.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 72%-99%) and the event-free survival including freedom from angina, MACE, and reintervention was 81.5% [95% CI, 68%-96%].

Conclusion: Incomplete revascularization via MIDCAB is a safe and effective procedure in selected patients with multivessel disease. Compared to conventional CABG in high-risk patients, MIDCAB carries a lower incidence of inhospital death, neurological events, and perioperative myocardial infarction with comparable midterm results.

References

Borst C, Santamore WP, Smedira NG, Bredée JJ. 1997. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting: on the beating heart via limited access. Ann Thorac Surg 63(6 Suppl):S1-5.nBourassa MG, Holubkov R, Yeh W, Detre KM. 1992. Strategy of complete revascularization in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (a report from the 1985-1986 NHLBI PTCA Registry). Am J Cardiol 70:174-8.nCalafiore AM, Angelini GD, Bergsland J, Salerno TA. 1996. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 62:1545-8.nCisowski M, Morawski W, Drzewiecki J, Bochenek A. 2002. Integrated minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) grafting and angioplasty for coronary artery revascularization. Heart Surg Forum 5 Suppl 4:S282-95.nDiegeler A, Spyrantis N, Matin M, et al. 2000. The revival of surgical treatment for isolated proximal high grade LAD lesions by minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 17 501-4.nDiegeler A, Thiele H, Falk V, et al. 2002. Comparison of stenting with minimally invasive bypass surgery for stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery. N Engl J Med. 347:561-6.nGaudino M, Glieca F, Alessandrini F, et al. 2004. High risk coronary artery bypass patient: incidence, surgical strategies, and results. Ann Thorac Surg 77:574-9.nHolzhey DM, Jacobs S, Mochalski M, et al. Seven-year follow-up after minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass: experience with more than 1300 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 83:108-14.nKahn SS, Kupfer JM, Matloff JM, Tsai TP, Nessim S. 1992. Interaction of age and preoperative risk factors in predicting operative mortality for coronary bypass surgery. Circulation 86(5 Suppl):II186-90.nLichtenberg A, Klima U, Paeschke H, et al. 2004. Impact of multivessel coronary artery disease on outcome after isloated minimally invasive bypass grafting of the left anterior descending artery. Ann Thorac Surg 78:487-91.nMeharwal ZS, Mishra YK, Kohli V, Bapna R, Singh S, Trehan N. 2002. Off-pump multivessel coronary artey surgery in high-risk patients. Ann Thorac Surg 74:S1353-7.nOsswald BR, Blackstone EH, Tochtermann U, et al. 2001. Does the completeness of revascularisation affect early survival after coronary artery bypass grafting in elderly patients? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 20:120-6.nSubramanian VA, McCabe JC, Geller CM. 1997. Minimally invasive direct coronary bypass grafting: two-year clinical experience. Ann Thorac Surg 64 1648-55.nZimarino M, Gallina S, Di Fluvio M, et al. 2004. Intraoperative ischemia and long-term events after minimally invasive coronary surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 78:135-41.n

Published

2007-11-22

How to Cite

Jacobs, S., Holzhey, D., Falk, V., Garbade, J., Walther, T., & Mohr, F. W. (2007). High-Risk Patients with Multivessel Disease—Is There a Role for Incomplete Myocardial Revascularization via Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting?. The Heart Surgery Forum, 10(6), E459-E462. https://doi.org/10.1532/HSF98.20061193

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2