Comparison of Transcatheter Mitral-Valve Repair and Surgical Mitral-Valve Repair in Elderly Patients with Mitral Regurgitation

Authors

  • Haoyong Yuan, MD Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, the Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6401-3914
  • Tingting Wei, MD Department of Pediatrics, Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Hunan, China
  • Zhongshi Wu, MD Engineering Laboratory of Hunan Province for Cardiovascular Biomaterials, Hunan, China
  • Ting Lu, MD Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, the Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
  • Jinlan Chen, MD Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, the Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
  • Yifan Zeng, MD Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, the Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
  • Ling Tan, MD Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, the Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
  • Can Huang, MD Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, the Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1532/hsf.3433

Keywords:

MitraClip therapy, transcather mitral valve repair, surgical mitral valve repair, mitral valve regurgitation

Abstract

Purpose: To summarize comparative studies of MitraClip versus surgical repair in typical, real-world elderly patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR) and analyze the safety and effectiveness of these therapeutic options.

Methods: PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL) were searched for comparative studies of transcatheter mitral-valve repair (TMVR) versus surgical mitral-valve repair (SMVR) in elderly patients with severe MR from January 2000 to June 2020. Statistical pooling for incidence estimates was performed according to a random-effects model with generic inverse-variance weighting, computing risk estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), using RevMan 5.3.

Results: A total of 14 reports comparing MitraClip with SMVR, enrolling 3355 patients with severe MR, were included in this study. Mean age, Logistic EuroSCORE, and incidence of diabetes mellitus (DM) were significantly higher in the MitraClip group, except the rate of patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class of >II and mean value of ejection fraction (EF). The arithmetic mean of freedom from acute mobility was similar. The 2 groups had equal all-cause mortality at 30 days, but different at 1 year (14% versus 9%) and 3 years in 7 studies (37% versus 25%). The freedom from recurrent MR ≥3+ was 88% and 97.3% at 30 days, 76.0% and 90.0% at 1 year, and 79% and 95% at 3 years in the MitraClip and surgical repair group, respectively.

Conclusion: Although MitraClip is safe and effective in selected high-risk patients, the surgery may be the only gold standard for “gray” patients. Further studies are needed to determine whether MitraClip should be recommended.

References

Alozie A, Paranskaya L, Westphal B, et al. Clinical outcomes of conventional surgery versus MitraClip® therapy for moderate to severe symptomatic mitral valve regurgitation in the elderly population: An institutional experience. BMC Cardiovasc Disor 2017;17:85.

Anwer LA, Dearani JA, Daly RC, et al. Degenerative mitral regurgitation after nonmitral cardiac surgery: Mitraclip versus surgical reconstruction. Ann Thorac Surg 2019;107:725-731.

Buzzatti N, Maisano F, Latib A, et al. Comparison of outcomes of percutaneous MitraClip versus surgical repair or replacement for degenerative mitral regurgitation in octogenarians. Am J Cardiol 2015;115:487-492.

Buzzatti N, Van Hemelrijck M, Denti P, et al. Transcatheter or surgical repair for degenerative mitral regurgitation in elderly patients: A propensity-weighted analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2019;158:86-94.

David TE, Armstrong S, McCrindle BW, Manlhiot C. Late outcomes of mitral valve repair for mitral regurgitation due to degenerative disease. Circulation 2013;127:1485-1492.

De Bonis M, Taramasso M, Lapenna E, et al. MitraClip therapy and surgical edge-to-edge repair in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction and secondary mitral regurgitation: Mid-term results of a single-centre experience. Eur J Cardio-Thorac 2015;49:255-262.

De Rosa R, Silverio A, Baldi C, et al. Transcatheter repair of functional mitral regurgitation in heart failure patients—A meta-analysis of 23 studies on MitraClip implantation. Circ J 2018;82:2800-2810.

Feldman T, Kar S, Elmariah S, et al. Randomized comparison of percutaneous repair and surgery for mitral regurgitation: 5-Year results of EVEREST II. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015;66:2844-2854.

Franzen O, Baldus S, Rudolph V, et al. Acute outcomes of MitraClip therapy for mitral regurgitation in high-surgical-risk patients: Emphasis on adverse valve morphology and severe left ventricular dysfunction. Eur Heart J 2010;31:1373-1381.

Glower D, Ailawadi G, Argenziano M, et al. EVEREST II randomized clinical trial: Predictors of mitral valve replacement in de novo surgery or after the MitraClip procedure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012;143(4 suppl):S60-S63.

Goel SS, Bajaj N, Aggarwal B, et al. Prevalence and outcomes of unoperated patients with severe symptomatic mitral regurgitation and heart failure: Comprehensive analysis to determine the potential role of MitraClip for this unmet need. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;63:185-186.

Gyoten T, Schenk S, Rochor K, et al. Outcome comparison of mitral valve surgery and MitraClip therapy in patients with severely reduced left ventricular dysfunction. ESC Heart Fail 2020;7:1781-1790.

Kortlandt F, Velu J, Schurer R, et al. Survival after MitraClip treatment compared to surgical and conservative treatment for high-surgical-risk patients with mitral regurgitation. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2018;11:e5985.

Mendirichaga R, Singh V, Blumer V, et al. Transcatheter mitral valve repair with MitraClip for symptomatic functional mitral valve regurgitation. Am J Cardiol 2017;120:708-715.

Niikura H, Gossl M, Bae R, et al. Impact of the commercial introduction of transcatheter mitral valve repair on mitral surgical practice. J Am Heart Assoc 2020;9:e14874.

Ondrus T, Bartunek J, Vanderheyden M, et al. Minimally invasive mitral valve repair for functional mitral regurgitation in severe heart failure: MitraClip versus minimally invasive surgical approach. Interact Cardiov Th 2016;23:784-789.

Ostovar R, Claus T, Hartrumpf M, et al. MitraClip for high-risk patients with significant mitral insufficiency: Shall we unreservedly recommend it? Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2018;66:537-544.

Paranskaya L, D’Ancona G, Bozdag-Turan I, et al. Percutaneous versus surgical repair of mitral valve regurgitation: Single institution early and midterm outcomes. Can J Cardiol 2013;29:452-459.

Stone GW, Lindenfeld J, Abraham WT, et al. Transcatheter mitral-valve repair in patients with heart failure. N Engl J Med 2018;379:2307-2318.

Swaans MJ, Bakker AL, Alipour A, et al. Survival of transcatheter mitral valve repair compared with surgical and conservative treatment in high-surgical-risk patients. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2014;7:875-881.

Takagi H, Ando T, Umemoto T. A review of comparative studies of MitraClip versus surgical repair for mitral regurgitation. Int J Cardiol 2017;228:289-294.

Taramasso M, Denti P, Buzzatti N, et al. Mitraclip therapy and surgical mitral repair in patients with moderate to severe left ventricular failure causing functional mitral regurgitation: A single-centre experience. Eur J Cardio-Thorac 2012;42:920-926.

Published

2021-02-15

How to Cite

Yuan, H., Wei, T., Wu, Z., Lu, T., Chen, J., Zeng, Y., Tan, L., & Huang, C. (2021). Comparison of Transcatheter Mitral-Valve Repair and Surgical Mitral-Valve Repair in Elderly Patients with Mitral Regurgitation. The Heart Surgery Forum, 24(1), E108-E115. https://doi.org/10.1532/hsf.3433

Issue

Section

Article